Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Remote family education and support program for parents of patients with adolescent and early adulthood eating disorders based on interpersonal psychotherapy: study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial

Journal of Eating Disorders volume 12, Article number: 61 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

In cases of adolescent and early adulthood eating disorders, despite the importance of the patients’ relationship with their parents, conflict and confusion frequently occur among them. Interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) is a present-focused psychotherapy that emphasizes the interpersonal context of symptoms. We developed a remote family education and support program exclusively for parents of patients with eating disorders, based on the principle of IPT. The use of IPT is expected to reduce conflicts in the patient-parent relationship. Consequently, parents will be better able to listen to patients, and patients will be better able to express their thoughts and desires. In this study, we describe the protocol for a randomized controlled trial designed to examine the effectiveness of this program in promoting effective communication in their home based on active listening skills of parents of patients with adolescent and early adulthood eating disorders.

Methods

Participants will be parents of patients aged 12–29 years with adolescent and early adulthood eating disorders. Individually randomized, parallel-group trial design will be employed. Seventy participants will be allocated to one of two treatment conditions: (1) remote family education and support program (four, 150 min weekly group sessions) for parents plus treatment-as-usual for patients (consultation by physicians or no treatment), or (2) waiting for the control condition (parents will wait to start the program for 8 weeks) plus treatment-as-usual for patients. The primary outcome measure will be parents’ active listening ability as measured by the Active Listening Attitude Scale at 8 weeks after randomization. Additionally, perception of social support (Social Provision Scale-10 item), loneliness (UCLA Loneliness Scale), mental health status (K6), family function (Family Assessment Device), and parent-evaluated eating disorder symptoms (Anorectic Behavior Observation Scale) will be assessed. Data from the intention-to-treat sample will be analyzed 8 weeks after randomization.

Discussion

This is the first study to evaluate the effectiveness of a family education and support program for parents of patients with adolescent and early adulthood eating disorders based on IPT. If this type of intervention is effective, although indirect, it could be a new support method for this patient population.

Trial registration: Clinical Trials. gov ID NCT05840614.

Plain English summary

For patients with adolescent and early adulthood eating disorders, although the relationship with their parents is an important interpersonal dynamic, conflicts and confusion often arise between patients and their parents. On the other hand, parents who live with individuals with eating disorders are frequently involved in interpersonal disputes, leading to a heavy psychological burden and elevated levels of depression and anxiety. It has been found that highly depressed or anxious parents tend to have difficulty listening carefully to their patients. Additionally, parental anxiety often promotes an overprotective response. Interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) is a present-focused psychotherapy that emphasizes the interpersonal context of symptoms. In IPT, the patient and therapist work within interpersonal therapeutic domains, such as interpersonal role disputes with different expectations and role transitions. We developed a remote family education and support program exclusively for parents of patients with eating disorders based on IPT principles. In the present study, we describe the protocol for a randomized controlled trial designed to examine the effectiveness of this program in promoting effective communication within their homes, focusing on the active listening skills of parents of patients with adolescent and early adulthood eating disorders.

Background

Eating disorders are serious mental disorders with peak onset in adolescence associated with high mortality, disability, and physical and psychological morbidity [1, 2]. Particularly common issues are interpersonal problems affecting their ability to form healthy and intimate relationships with others during adolescence and early adulthood. Patients with eating disorders have been found to display more interpersonal problems compared with non-clinical samples [3], which contributes to the maintenance of eating disorder symptoms; the degree of interpersonal problems is positively associated with more concerns over eating, shape, and weight, as well as the severity of bulimic behaviors [4].

For patients with adolescent and early adulthood eating disorders, the relationship with their parents is an important interpersonal relationship. However, parents who live with individuals suffering from eating disorders often find themselves entangled in prolonged interpersonal conflicts, placing a significant psychological burden, particularly on mothers [5]. In a systematic review of the expressed emotion (EE) in eating disorders, caregivers frequently exhibit high levels of EE, particularly emotional overinvolvement (EOI) [6]. EE is an index reflecting the familial relationship and is assessed by examining the emotions expressed towards the patient by family members. High EE among caregivers is considered a natural response in situations where caregivers have little information about their patient’s treatment, feel ill-equipped to cope, and experience isolation without adequate support. Although several effective treatments for eating disorders exist [7,8,9], it remains challenging to provide these for everyone in need. In the context of eating disorders, high EE among caregivers has been associated with increased anxiety and depression [10], heightened caregiver distress [11], and diminished caregiving skills [11]. Although several studies suggest that parents’ EE may not consistently predict treatment outcomes, particularly in adolescents [12,13,14], numerous others indicate that high EE in caregivers may negatively impact outcomes of ED treatment [15,16,17]. In addition, many studies suggest that parents of individuals with eating disorders experience elevated levels of depression and anxiety [10, 18,19,20]. It has been found that highly depressed or anxious parents may struggle to effectively communicate with their children. Among mothers of individuals with eating disorders, there is a significant negative correlation between depression or anxiety and their ability to actively listen as measured by Active Listening Attitude Scale (ALAS) [21]. Moreover, parental anxiety often triggers an overprotective response that manifests as EOI. Parents’ anxiety may lead to behaviors characterized by excessive attention, over-adaptation to the situation, or attempts to conceal negative patient outcomes [10, 22].

Interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) is a time-limited and affect-, life-event-, and present-focused psychotherapy originally conceptualized for depression [23]. In IPT for depression, the patient and therapist work collaboratively on one (or two) of the following four interpersonal therapeutic foci: (1) lack of intimacy and interpersonal deficits; (2) interpersonal role disputes with different expectations (a conflict, overt or covert, in an important relationship); (3) role transitions; and (4) complicated grief. In addition, family-based IPT (FB-IPT) was developed as a treatment approach for preadolescent depression [24, 25]. FB-IPT focuses on improving parent-patient conflict to decrease preadolescent depression. FB-IPT integrates individual meetings with at least one parent to provide psychoeducation, introduce parenting tips, and set expectations for helping patients maintain daily routines. A prior trial demonstrated that preadolescent patients with depression who underwent FB-IPT were more likely to achieve remission post-treatment than those who underwent child-centered therapy (66% vs. 31%) [25]. In the RCT on preadolescents with loss-of-control-eating, patients in FB-IPT (12 weekly, 45-min session delivered to parent-patient dyads) had a greater reduction in disordered-eating attitudes, as measured by the Eating Disorder Examination adapted for Children at six-months, compared to family-based health education as a control intervention [26].

Considering the characteristics of adolescent and early adulthood patients with eating disorders, their parents are likely to encounter issues related to interpersonal role disputes with different expectations and role transitions within the therapeutic framework of IPT. Additionally, patients with eating disorders have been found to lack confidence in identifying their thoughts and feelings [27, 28]. Consequently, they may struggle to assert their thoughts and desires appropriately and may experience difficulty in expressing themselves to others [3, 4, 29]. As a result, communication between patients and parents in the home may become conflicted and confused due to these features of eating disorders. In such a situation, it is difficult for both patients and parents to clearly recognize their own desires or to guess the other person’s expectations. Additionally, adolescent patients with eating disorders and their parents have difficulty adjusting to the role transition that accompanies physical and mental growth. If parents can listen attentively without experiencing anxiety and communicate with patients in a way that recognizes the role transition associated with adolescent growth, it is expected to lead to improved patient-parent interpersonal relationships and allow patients to cope and challenge themselves with a variety of issues in age-appropriate ways without parents’ overprotection.

In the present study, we developed a family education and support program exclusively for the parents of patients with eating disorders using IPT, focusing on the interpersonal role dispute with differences in expectations and role transitions. It is evident that FB-IPT, targeting both patients and parents, is more effective in treatment. However, treatment resistance and drop out from treatment are common features of eating disorders [30, 31], and initiating and maintaining treatment of eating disorders is extremely difficult. Nevertheless, considering that parent-focused treatment, which addresses only the parents, has been shown to be as effective as family-based treatment (FBT), which involves the entire family, including patients, we believe it is worthwhile to approach only the parents using the IPT concept [32].

In the present study, we designed a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) to examine the effectiveness of the remote family education and support program in promoting effective communication within their homes, focusing on the active listening skills of parents of patients with adolescent and early adulthood eating disorders.

Methods

Design overview

This pilot RCT will be conducted on parents of patients with eating disorders who will be allocated to one of two arms: (1) remote family education and support program in addition to treatment-as-usual for patients and (2) treatment-as-usual for patients only. Treatment-as-usual consists of consultation administered by a physician or no treatment. The primary endpoint is improvement in parent’s active listening ability, as measured by the Active Listening Attitude Scale at 8 weeks (Fig. 1, Table 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study flowchart. ALAS, Active Listening Attitude Scale; ABOS, Anorectic Behavior Observation Scale; SPS-10, Social Provision Scale 10 item; ULS, University of California, Los Angeles Loneliness Scale; K6, Kessler Psychological Distress Scale; and FAD, Family Assessment Device

Full size image
Table 1 Schedule of enrolment, interventions, and assessments
Full size table

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of Nagoya City University Graduate School of Nursing. All participants will be asked to provide written informed consent after the purpose and procedures of the study have been explained. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under number NCT05840614. The study was designed in accordance with the SPIRIT statement [33].

Eligibility criteria

The target population will be parents of patients with adolescent or early adulthood eating disorders. The inclusion criteria will be as follows: (1) parents of patients who have been diagnosed with eating disorders (anorexia nervosa; AN and bulimia nervosa; BN) by a physician or have symptoms of an eating disorder (parents may or may not be biological parents); (2) parent-rated Anorectic Behavior Observation Scale (ABOS) score > 8 points at enrollment; (3) patient age between 12 and 29 years at enrollment; (4) parents who live with patients at the time of enrollment and are expected to live with them during the study period; (5) patients with other psychiatric comorbidities; and (6) parents with other psychiatric comorbidities. Patients may or may not undergo any kind of treatment. If multiple family members (e.g., father and mother) participate in the program, a primary participant will be determined; that person will be the target research participant. The reason for targeting both AN and BN is that family dysfunction due to inadequate communication skills of parents is present in families with both diagnoses and is related to patient symptoms [34, 35]. The reason for targeting the age range of 12–29 years is that even though individuals may be in their late twenties, they often have not completed the developmental tasks of adolescence due to eating disorders and may remain adolescent-minded. Social and economic changes, such as increased access to third-level education and improvements in reproductive health, have led to delays in achieving key milestones of adulthood (e.g., marriage, home ownership), resulting in a growing consensus amongst developmental researchers that adulthood is not achieved until the mid-twenties [36, 37]. Therefore, individuals in their twenties continue to transition into adulthood. Moreover, in the present study, we target parents and patients who live together; thus, conflict within the family may persist, even if they are in their late twenties. The following will be the exclusion criteria: (1) parents who cannot read or write in Japanese; (2) parents who cannot use the Zoom online meeting system; and (3) study investigators and their families. No treatment will be excluded from consideration. This decision is based on the desire to adapt the study results as an effective study for families with eating disorders at all stages of treatment. Even FBT, which has the most empirical support in the treatment of adolescent AN [9], is not effective for all patients, with only 30–50% achieving full remission at the end-of treatment [38, 39].

Procedure

We will recruit participants using our Japanese-language website and flyers. Participants will sign up via e-mail. We will provide eligible participants with an ID number and ask them to provide informed consent and complete a baseline assessment. After the baseline assessment, participants will be randomized. Assessments will be performed at baseline (Assessment I), before randomization, and at 4 weeks (Assessment II) and 8 weeks (Assessment III) after randomization (Fig. 1). The trial period will be from week 0 to week 4, and the follow-up period from week 4 to week 8. Assessment II will be performed at the week 4 evaluation date ± 5 days, and Assessment III at the week 8 evaluation date ± 5 days.

Randomisation

Participants will be randomly allocated to one of the two groups in a 1:1 ratio. A computer randomization system will generate the random allocation sequences using minimization and stratify participants according to their ability to engage in active listening (ALAS score cutoff of 36 points).

Treatment

Intervention

The remote family education and support program will include group therapy divided into four sessions (Table 2). Each session will consist of a lecture, followed by role- playing and supportive group therapy, with a duration of approximately 150 min. The groups will comprise approximately six to nine members, and will meet once a week over the course of 4 weeks. Participants will use the Zoom online meeting system in their own homes. The remote family education and support program will consist of IPT elements and family psychoeducation. Family psychoeducation is a method for working with families who are supporting persons with mental illness and has been associated with relapse prevention or improving symptoms [40,41,42]. Family psychoeducation is more than just providing information. It also focuses on the development of problem-solving, communication, and coping skills. Studies on family psychoeducation for eating disorders have shown that caregivers report an increase in knowledge about eating disorders, an enhancement in their self-efficacy, and a reduction in EE, particularly EOI, as well as psychological and family distress [43, 44]. We will provide participants with information on symptoms of eating disorders with the goal of externalizing the illness. In the first session, we will inform the participants about the symptoms of eating disorders and the mechanism of IPT; in the second session, we will share details about the characteristics of adolescents; and in the third and fourth sessions, we will provide participants with information on effective communication based on IPT. During the third and fourth sessions, we will explain the mechanism of interpersonal role disputes with differences in expectations and the role transition with adolescent growth using an adolescent eating disorder case. Subsequently, participants will role-play using IPT communication skills. Supportive group therapy using problem-solving focuses on members’ strengths and on coping ideas.

Table 2 Overview of the remote family education and support program content
Full size table

Control condition

Participants allocated to the waiting control group will wait to start the remote family education and support program for 8 weeks. There will be no intervention in the control group.

Therapist training/supervision and fidelity control

Three therapists will conduct the program. The first author (FK) is a nurse and family therapist certified by the Japan Network of Psychoeducation and Family Support Program [45] and received IPT first class workshop certification. The fourth author (HS) is a nurse and psychologist. The third therapist is a nurse. All therapists have psychiatric nursing experience. The third author (MK) is a certified supervisor authorized by the International Society of Interpersonal Psychotherapy and will supervise this program. To ensure the fidelity of each session, all sessions will be recorded on a computer, and 25% of each condition will be randomly selected, evaluated, and commented on for continuous improvements by an independent researcher.

Outcome measures for parents

Baseline characteristics

The following baseline sociodemographic characteristics will be obtained: (1) age (parent’s and patient’s); (2) patient’s eating disorder duration; (3) patient’s sex; (4) family relationship (father, mother, and other); and (5) whether parents participate in a family self-help group.

Primary outcome measure for parents

This program aims to improve the confusion and stagnation in patient-parent communication within the home, focusing on enhancing parents’ active listening abilities. Thus, we selected the ALAS score as the primary outcome measure.

Active Listening Attitude Scale (ALAS)

The ALAS, developed by Mishima et al.[46], will be used to assess the listening attitude. The ALAS comprises 20 items in two subscales: listening attitude (10 items) and listening skills (10 items). Each item is scored from 0 to 3; the higher the score, the better the listening attitude or skill. Cronbach’s α of the ALAS in our previous study was 0.855 [47].

Secondary outcome measures for parents

Anorectic Behavior Observation Scale (ABOS)

The ABOS is a questionnaire used to evaluate patients’ eating behavior based on information provided by their relatives. The ABOS consists of 30 items to be answered ‘yes’ (2 points) or ‘no’ (0 points) if relatives are certain of the information, or ‘?’ (1 point) if relatives are uncertain. The higher the total score, the more pathological the subject’s behavior is considered to be. The ABOS has three domains: (a) eating behavior, concern with weight and food, denial of the problem; (b) bulimic-like behavior; and (c) hyperactivity. The ABOS has a sensitivity of 90.0% and a specificity of 89.6% [48]. The reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the ABOS has been confirmed with Cronbach’s α value of 0.82 [49].

Social provisions scale-10 item (SPS-10)

The perception of social support will be evaluated using the shortened version of the Social Provisions Scale (SPS), originally created by Cutrona and Russell [50] and later shortened (SPS-10) by Iapichino et al. [51]. We created a Japanese version of the SPS-10 [52]. The SPS-10 consists of 10 items and retains the following five of the six original SPS subscales: attachment (emotional support), social integration, reassurance of worth, reliable alliance (material support), and guidance. The total SPS-10 score can range from 10 to 40, with a higher score indicating a stronger perceived provision of social support. Cronbach’s α of the original Italian version was 0.809 [51], and that of the Japanese version was 0.89 [52].

University of California, Los Angeles loneliness scale (ULS)

To assess loneliness, we will use the Japanese version [53] of the University of California, Los Angeles Loneliness Scale (ULS), originally developed by Russell et al. [54]. The ULS is a 20-item scale, with each item scored from 1 to 4; the higher the score, the stronger the loneliness. Cronbach’s α of the Japanese version was 0.885 [55].

Kessler psychological distress scale (K6)

To assess psychological distress, we will use the Japanese version [56] of the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6), originally developed by Kessler et al. [57]. The K6 is a 6-item self-reported scale that was developed to screen for depression and anxiety disorders based on definitions from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fourth Edition), and it analyzes patients’ symptoms over the last 30 days. Moreover, it can be used to quantify nonspecific psychological distress [57]. Items are rated from 0 to 4, and the total score ranges from 0 to 24; the higher the score, the more severe the psychological distress. Two independent studies have analyzed and confirmed the excellent validity of the K6 [57, 58], and the validity of the Japanese version has also been confirmed [56]. Cronbach’s α of the original tool was 0.89 [57].

Family Assessment Device (FAD)

To assess family functioning, we will employ the Japanese version of the Family Assessment Device (FAD) [59], developed by Epstein et al. [60]. The FAD is used to evaluate a family system based on the MacMaster model of family functioning, and comprises seven subscales. We will use only the General Functioning subscale. Each item will be scored from 1 to 4; the higher the score, the poorer the family functioning. Cronbach’s α of the General Functioning subscale was 0.92 in the original study [60] and 0.85 in another study [61]. The Family Questionnaire [62], typically used to assess family functioning in eating disorders studies [63, 64], was not chosen for the present study due to the unavailability of a Japanese version.

Sample size and statistical power

The sample size was calculated based on a power analysis conducted for the ALAS score. Effect sizes were estimated from our previous cohort study [21]. The change in ALAS scores from pre-treatment to post-treatment (8 weeks after randomization) was 7 ± 6.0 (mean ± SD) in the intervention group and 1 ± 6.0 in the waiting control group. With a power of 0.9 to detect a significant difference at P = 0.05 (two-sided), it was calculated that 28 patients would be required for each arm. Thus, allowing for a 20% dropout rate, 35 participants will need to be recruited per group.

Data analysis plan

Statistical analysis will be performed using IBM SPSS Statistics v.26 for Windows (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The initial descriptive statistics will summarize participant characteristics as means, standard deviations, minima, maxima, frequencies, and percentages. All analyses will be based on the intent-to-treat model. We will use analysis of covariance at 8 weeks if there is no missing data at that time. If missing data is observed, we will use the maximum likelihood mixed model, which accounts for missing data, provided that the data are missing at random, conditional on the covariates and the baseline values of the outcome. P < 0.05 will be set to test the null hypothesis.

Discussion

This paper describes the study protocol for an RCT designed to investigate the effectiveness of a remote family education and support program using IPT for parents of patients with adolescent and early adulthood eating disorders. The primary outcome of this study is the active listening ability of parents at 8 weeks after randomization, and secondary outcomes include eating disorder symptoms of patients observed by parents, loneliness, social support, mental health status, and family functioning.

In patients with eating disorders, interpersonal problems are common. In particular, adolescent and early adulthood patients and their parents have difficulty in domestic communication and adjusting to the role transition, because adolescent patients undergo large and rapid changes due to physical and mental growth. The IPT concept (including interpersonal role dispute with different expectations and role transition) is expected to fit well the adolescent and early adulthood patients with an eating disorder and their parents.

The current study has several strengths. First, it is the first attempt to use IPT theory for a parental education and support program for eating disorders. Second, we created a program focusing on the role transition through changes in adolescence and early adulthood. Third, this program is a remote participation program; therefore, participants can join from anywhere in Japan. In Japan, the treatment system for eating disorders is inadequate, and with only five treatment base hospitals in the country. Many patients do not receive adequate treatment because hospitals with specialists in the treatment of eating disorders are far away. Therefore, their parents are also living with anxiety and loneliness. Fourth, we will assess not only the parents’ status but also the eating disorder symptoms of patients, as measured by the ABOS. The ABOS is a useful instrument for eating disorders with high sensitivity and specificity [48]. This trial also has limitations. Patients themselves cannot participate in this program in the current study. Naturally, treatment is best conducted with both patients and their parents according to the FB-IPT, particularly in the treatment of adolescents. Further studies will be designed for both patients and parents to participate in the program.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed in the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ABOS:

Anorectic Behavior Observation Scale

ALAS:

Active Listening Attitude Scale

EE:

Expressed emotion

EOI:

Emotional overinvolvement

FAD:

Family Assessment Device

FB-IPT:

Family-based interpersonal psychotherapy

IPT:

Interpersonal psychotherapy

K6:

Kessler Psychological Distress Scale

RCT:

Randomized controlled trial

SPS-10:

Social Provision Scale 10 item

ULS:

University of California, Los Angeles Loneliness Scale

References

  1. Arcelus J, Mitchell AJ, Wales J, Nielsen S. Mortality rates in patients with anorexia nervosa and other eating disorders. A meta-analysis of 36 studies. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011;68(7):724–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Berkman ND, Lohr KN, Bulik CM. Outcomes of eating disorders: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Eat Disord. 2007;40(4):293–309.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Troop NA, Allan S, Treasure JL, Katzman M. Social comparison and submissive behaviour in eating disorder patients. Psychol Psychother. 2003;76(Pt 3):237–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hartmann A, Zeeck A, Barrett MS. Interpersonal problems in eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord. 2010;43(7):619–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. van Hoeken D, Hoek HW. Review of the burden of eating disorders: mortality, disability, costs, quality of life, and family burden. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2020;33(6):521–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Anastasiadou D, Medina-Pradas C, Sepulveda AR, Treasure J. A systematic review of family caregiving in eating disorders. Eat Behav. 2014;15(3):464–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Treasure J, Claudino AM, Zucker N. Eating disorders. Lancet. 2010;375(9714):583–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Couturier J, Isserlin L, Norris M, Spettigue W, Brouwers M, Kimber M, McVey G, Webb C, Findlay S, Bhatnagar N, et al. Canadian practice guidelines for the treatment of children and adolescents with eating disorders. J Eat Disord. 2020;8:4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Lock J. An update on evidence-based psychosocial treatments for eating disorders in children and adolescents. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2015;44(5):707–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kyriacou O, Treasure J, Schmidt U. Expressed emotion in eating disorders assessed via self-report: an examination of factors associated with expressed emotion in carers of people with anorexia nervosa in comparison to control families. Int J Eat Disord. 2008;41(1):37–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rhind C, Salerno L, Hibbs R, Micali N, Schmidt U, Gowers S, Macdonald P, Goddard E, Todd G, Tchanturia K, et al. The objective and subjective caregiving burden and caregiving behaviours of parents of adolescents with anorexia nervosa. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2016;24(4):310–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rienecke RD, Gorrell S, Blalock DV, Smith K, Lock J, Le Grange D. Expressed emotion and long-term outcome among adolescents with anorexia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord. 2021;54(11):2019–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Rienecke RD, Gorrell S, Johnson M, Duffy A, Mehler PS, Le Grange D. Expressed emotion and treatment outcome in higher levels of care for eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord. 2023;56(3):628–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Duclos J, Dorard G, Cook-Darzens S, Curt F, Faucher S, Berthoz S, Falissard B, Godart N. Predictive factors for outcome in adolescents with anorexia nervosa: to what extent does parental Expressed Emotion play a role? PLoS ONE. 2018;13(7):e0196820.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Zabala MJ, Macdonald P, Treasure J. Appraisal of caregiving burden, expressed emotion and psychological distress in families of people with eating disorders: a systematic review. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2009;17(5):338–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rienecke RD, Accurso EC, Lock J, Le Grange D. Expressed emotion, family functioning, and treatment outcome for adolescents with anorexia nervosa. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2016;24(1):43–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Le Grange D, Hoste RR, Lock J, Bryson SW. Parental expressed emotion of adolescents with anorexia nervosa: outcome in family-based treatment. Int J Eat Disord. 2011;44(8):731–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Treasure J, Murphy T, Szmukler G, Todd G, Gavan K, Joyce J. The experience of caregiving for severe mental illness: a comparison between anorexia nervosa and psychosis. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2001;36(7):343–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gonzalez N, Padierna A, Martin J, Aguirre U, Quintana JM. Predictors of change in perceived burden among caregivers of patients with eating disorders. J Affect Disord. 2012;139(3):273–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Espina A. Alexithymia in parents of daughters with eating disorders: its relationships with psychopathological and personality variables. J Psychosom Res. 2003;55(6):553–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Katsuki F, Yamada A, Kondo M, Sawada H, Watanabe N, Akechi T. Association between social support for mothers of patients with eating disorders and mothers’ active listening attitude: a cohort study. Biopsychosoc Med. 2023;17(1):4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Treasure J, Sepulveda AR, MacDonald P, Whitaker W, Lopez C, Zabala M, Kyriacou O, Todd G. The assessment of the family of people with eating disorders. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2008;16(4):247–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Weissman MM, et al. Comprehensive guide to Interpersonal Psychotherapy. New York: Basic Behavioral Science Books; 2000

  24. Dietz LJ. Family-based interpersonal psychotherapy: an intervention for preadolescent depression. Am J Psychother. 2020;73(1):22–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dietz LJ, Weinberg RJ, Brent DA, Mufson L. Family-based interpersonal psychotherapy for depressed preadolescents: examining efficacy and potential treatment mechanisms. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2015;54(3):191–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shomaker LB, Tanofsky-Kraff M, Matherne CE, Mehari RD, Olsen CH, Marwitz SE, Bakalar JL, Ranzenhofer LM, Kelly NR, Schvey NA, et al. A randomized, comparative pilot trial of family-based interpersonal psychotherapy for reducing psychosocial symptoms, disordered-eating, and excess weight gain in at-risk preadolescents with loss-of-control-eating. Int J Eat Disord. 2017;50(9):1084–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Wollast R, Fossion P, Kotsou I, Rebrassé A, Leys C. Interoceptive awareness and anorexia nervosa: when emotions influence the perception of physiological sensations. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2022;210(5):390–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Leppanen J, Brown D, McLinden H, Williams S, Tchanturia K. The role of emotion regulation in eating disorders: a network meta-analysis approach. Front Psychiatry. 2022;13:793094.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Williams GJ, Power KG, Millar HR, Freeman CP, Yellowlees A, Dowds T, Walker M, Campsie L, MacPherson F, Jackson MA. Comparison of eating disorders and other dietary/weight groups on measures of perceived control, assertiveness, self-esteem, and self-directed hostility. Int J Eat Disord. 1993;14(1):27–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Campbell M. Drop-out from treatment for the eating disorders: a problem for clinicians and researchers. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2009;17(4):239–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Halmi KA. Perplexities of treatment resistance in eating disorders. BMC Psychiatry. 2013;13:292.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Le Grange D, Hughes EK, Court A, Yeo M, Crosby RD, Sawyer SM. Randomized clinical trial of parent-focused treatment and family-based treatment for adolescent anorexia nervosa. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016;55(8):683–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krleža-Jerić K, Hróbjartsson A, Mann H, Dickersin K, Berlin JA, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(3):200–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Holtom-Viesel A, Allan S. A systematic review of the literature on family functioning across all eating disorder diagnoses in comparison to control families. Clin Psychol Rev. 2014;34(1):29–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Erriu M, Cimino S, Cerniglia L. The role of family relationships in eating disorders in adolescents: a narrative review. Behav Sci (Basel). 2020;10(4):71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ledford H. Who exactly counts as an adolescent? Nature. 2018;554(7693):429–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Office for National Statistics: Milestones: Journeying Into Adulthood. Retrieved from 2018 https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates/articles/milestonesjourneyingintoadulthood/2019-02-18. Accessed 30 March 2024

  38. Lock J, Le Grange D. Family-based treatment: where are we and where should we be going to improve recovery in child and adolescent eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord. 2019;52(4):481–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hagan KE, Matheson BE, Datta N, L’Insalata AM, Onipede ZA, Gorrell S, Mondal S, Bohon CM, Le Grange D, Lock JD. Understanding outcomes in family-based treatment for adolescent anorexia nervosa: a network approach. Psychol Med. 2023;53(2):396–407.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Katsuki F, Watanabe N, Yamada A, Hasegawa T. Effectiveness of family psychoeducation for major depressive disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis. BJPsych Open. 2022;8(5):e148.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Lyman DR, Braude L, George P, Dougherty RH, Daniels AS, Ghose SS, Delphin-Rittmon ME. Consumer and family psychoeducation: assessing the evidence. Psychiatr Serv. 2014;65(4):416–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bighelli I, Rodolico A, García-Mieres H, Pitschel-Walz G, Hansen WP, Schneider-Thoma J, Siafis S, Wu H, Wang D, Salanti G, et al. Psychosocial and psychological interventions for relapse prevention in schizophrenia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry. 2021;8(11):969–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Uehara T, Kawashima Y, Goto M, Tasaki SI, Someya T. Psychoeducation for the families of patients with eating disorders and changes in expressed emotion: a preliminary study. Compr Psychiatry. 2001;42(2):132–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kurnik Mesarič K, Damjanac Ž, Debeljak T, Kodrič J. Effectiveness of psychoeducation for children, adolescents and caregivers in the treatment of eating disorders: a systematic review. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2024;32(1):99–115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. JNPF: The standard model of the Japanese Network of Psychoeducation and Family Support Program. https://jnpf.net/?page_id=104. Accessed 30 March 2024

  46. Mishima N, Kubota S, Nagata S. The development of a questionnaire to assess the attitude of active listening. J Occup Health. 2000;42:111–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Yamada A, Katsuki F, Kondo M, Sawada H, Watanabe N, Akechi T. Association between the social support for mothers of patients with eating disorders, maternal mental health, and patient symptomatic severity: a cross-sectional study. J Eat Disord. 2021;9(1):8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Vandereycken W. Validity and reliability of the Anorectic Behavior Observation Scale for parents. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1992;85(2):163–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Uehara T, Takeuchi K, Ohmori I, Kawashima Y, Goto M, Mikuni M, Vandereycken W. Factor-analytic study of the Anorectic Behavior Observation Scale in Japan: comparisons with the original Belgian study. Psychiatry Res. 2002;111(2–3):241–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Cutrona CE, Russell D. The provision of social relationship and adaptation to stress. Adv Pers Relat. 1987;1:37–67.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Iapichino E, Rucci P, Corbani IE, Apter G, Quartieri Bollani M, Cauli G, Gala C, Bassi M. Development and validation of an abridged version of the Social Provisions Scale (SPS-10) in Italian. J Psychopathol. 2016;22:157–63.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Katsuki F, Yamada A, Kondo M, Sawada H, Watanabe N, Akechi T, Rucci P. Development and validation of the 10-item Social Provisions Scale (SPS-10) Japanese version, Nagoya. Med J. 2020;56(4):229–39.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Moroi K Dimensions of the revised UCLA Loneliness Scale. In: Annual reports of departments of social & human studies and language and literature 1992; vol 42, pp 23–51

  54. Russell DW. UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): reliability, validity, and factor structure. J Pers Assess. 1996;66(1):20–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Moroi K. Loneliness and self-consciousness in high-school students. Japn J Psychol. 1985;56(4):237–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Furukawa TA, Kawakami N, Saitoh M, Ono Y, Nakane Y, Nakamura Y, Tachimori H, Iwata N, Uda H, Nakane H, et al. The performance of the Japanese version of the K6 and K10 in the World Mental Health Survey Japan. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2008;17(3):152–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Kessler RC, Barker PR, Colpe LJ, Epstein JF, Gfroerer JC, Hiripi E, Howes MJ, Normand SL, Manderscheid RW, Walters EE, et al. Screening for serious mental illness in the general population. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003;60(2):184–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Furukawa TA, Kessler RC, Slade T, Andrews G. The performance of the K6 and K10 screening scales for psychological distress in the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Well-Being. Psychol Med. 2003;33(2):357–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Saeki T, Asukai N, Miyake Y, Miguchi M, Yamawaki S. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Family Assessment Device (FAD). Arch Psychiatr Diag Clin Eval. 1997;8:181–92.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Epstein NB, Baldwin LM, Bishop DS. The McMaster Family Assessment Device. J Marital Fam Ther. 1983;9(2):171–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Hausken SES, Lie HC, Lien N, Sleddens EFC, Melbye EL, Bjelland M. The reliability of the general functioning scale in Norwegian 13–15-year-old adolescents and association with family dinner frequency. Nutr J. 2019;18(1):20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Wiedemann G, Rayki O, Feinstein E, Hahlweg K. The Family Questionnaire: development and validation of a new self-report scale for assessing expressed emotion. Psychiatry Res. 2002;109(3):265–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Moskovich AA, Timko CA, Honeycutt LK, Zucker NL, Merwin RM. Change in expressed emotion and treatment outcome in adolescent anorexia nervosa. Eat Disord. 2017;25(1):80–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Munsch S, Dremmel D, Kurz S, De Albuquerque J, Meyer AH, Hilbert A. Influence of parental expressed emotions on children’s emotional eating via children’s negative urgency. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2017;25(1):36–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.

Funding

This study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI Grant Number 19H03936) from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Nursing, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Japan

    Fujika Katsuki & Hanayo Sawada

  2. Department of Psychiatry, Soseikai General Hospital, 101 Shimotoba, Hiroosa-machi, Fushimiku, Kyoto, Japan

    Norio Watanabe

  3. National Center for Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Research, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1 Ogawahigashi-cho, Kodaira, Tokyo, Japan

    Masaki Kondo

  4. Department of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Japan

    Atsurou Yamada

Authors
  1. Fujika Katsuki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Norio Watanabe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Masaki Kondo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hanayo Sawada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Atsurou Yamada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

FK, MK, AY, HS, and NW designed the study. FK wrote the manuscript. MK and NW supervised the study and edited various drafts of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fujika Katsuki.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of Nagoya City University Graduate School of Nursing, Japan (Ref: No 22033-4). All participants will be provided written informed consent to participate in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

FK received speaker’s fees from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. MK received speaker's fees from Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and Sumitomo Pharma Co., Ltd. HS declares no conflicts of interest. AY is an employee of a course endowed by Nagoya City and received medical fees from Gifu Hospital, speaker's fees from Aichi Education and Sports Foundation, Viatris Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Nobel Pharma Co., Ltd., Shionogi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Mental Care Association Japan, instructor fees from Asamidori no Kai, a social welfare corporation, consulting fees from Yohaku Bunka Co., Ltd. and other fees from Nagoya City. NW has received royalties from Sogensha, Medical View, and Advantage Risk Management for writing.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Katsuki, F., Watanabe, N., Kondo, M. et al. Remote family education and support program for parents of patients with adolescent and early adulthood eating disorders based on interpersonal psychotherapy: study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Eat Disord 12, 61 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-024-01013-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-024-01013-z

Keywords

Journal of Eating Disorders

ISSN: 2050-2974