Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Validation of an Arabic version of the eating disorder inventory’s body dissatisfaction subscale among adolescents, adults, and pregnant women

Journal of Eating Disorders volume 11, Article number: 187 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Introduction

The 9-item Body Dissatisfaction Subscale (BDS) of the Eating Disorder Inventory is one of the most used tools for assessing thinness-oriented body dissatisfaction in research and clinical practice. However, no validated Arabic version of this scale exists to date. In this study, we sought to validate this instrument in three samples of native Arabic-speaking adolescents, adults, and pregnant women from Lebanon.

Methods

A total of 826 adults, 555 adolescents, and 433 pregnant women were included. To examine the factor structure of the BDS, we performed an exploratory factor analysis (EFA), using a principal component analysis via the FACTOR software on the first split-half subsample among Lebanese adults. We used data from the second split-half in the adult sample to conduct a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) through the SPSS AMOS v.29 software. That verified model was tested via CFA on adolescents and pregnant women.

Results

The EFA showed a bidimensional structure for the BDS, with all 9 items retained and divided into Factor 1 = Body Satisfaction (negatively-worded items) and Factor 2 = Body Dissatisfaction (positively-worded items). The CFA demonstrated invariable goodness-of-fit of the instrument in the three studied populations. McDonald’s omega values were also adequate in the three samples, demonstrating its reliability. Moreover, the BDS showed invariance across sex among both adolescents and adults. Finally, higher BDS scores were correlated with more disordered eating, less body appreciation and less functionality appreciation, thus attesting to convergent validity of the scale. In addition, BDS scores correlated positively with depression and anxiety scores, indicating adequate patterns of divergent validity.

Conclusion

In light of our findings, we endorse the use of the BDS by healthcare professionals in Arabic-speaking countries, in order to assess thinness-oriented body dissatisfaction in an appropriate and timely manner and ease early referral to a specialist, thereby preventing the deleterious health-related risks associated with this condition.

Plain English Summary

Body dissatisfaction is conceptualized as the pejorative subjective assessment of one's own body and discontent with the visual perception of it or with a particular feature of appearance, which is considered to be the most important global measure of stress related to the body. Body dissatisfaction has been found to be a predictor for the development of an eating disorder and occurs in individuals with different mental disorders. The 9-item Body Dissatisfaction Subscale (BDS) of the Eating Disorder Inventory is one of the most used tools for assessing thinness-focused body dissatisfaction, but has not yet been validated in Arabic. To this end, we aimed to translate and validate the Arabic version of the BDS in the present study, which would in turn facilitate research and improve clinical practices related to body dissatisfaction in Arabic-speaking nations. The present findings provide support for the psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the BDS for examining body dissatisfaction in Arabic-speaking adolescents, adults, and pregnant women in Lebanon.

Introduction

Within recent decades, research into body dissatisfaction and its adverse outcomes has significantly risen [1,2,3]. In contrast to common belief, body image dissatisfaction constitutes a widespread concern among the general population of both sexes and different age ranges, and does not limit to young adult women [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. As a result, researchers have generated a wide variety of tools for assessing this construct, including measures of both thinness-oriented and muscularity-oriented body dissatisfaction as well as measures of positive aspects of body image [12].

An international and widely employed tool for assessing thinness-oriented body dissatisfaction in research and clinical practice worldwide is the 9-item Body Dissatisfaction Subscale (BDS) of the Eating Disorder Inventory [13,14,15,16], a highly internally consistent self-report scale developed by Garner et al. [17]. Researchers confirmed the EDI’s psychometric adequacy (i.e., validity and reliability) in a variety of countries, populations, and age groups [18]; including Swedish [19, 20], Chinese [21], Taiwanese [22], Korean [23], Austrian [24], Chilean [25], and Japanese adults [26] as well as American [27], Chilean [25], German [28], Argentinian [29], and French adolescents [30]. In particular, the 9 items of the BDS demonstrated consistent and excellent psychometric performance and reliability across languages and populations, remaining unchanged between the original version (EDI) and subsequent revision (EDI-2) [17, 31]. Regarding the validation of the EDI in the Arabic language, it is noteworthy that the original validation had to exclude measures of the body satisfaction subscale, underscoring the importance of investigating the body dissatisfaction construct via the BDS in the Lebanese cultural and linguistic context [32].

Body dissatisfaction during the unique pregnancy period

Another population which has consistently shown an increased susceptibility to body image dissatisfaction is pregnant women [33,34,35,36], as pregnancy results in significant physical changes and increased societal pressures related to appearance, making it an emotionally critical period of life [37]. Body dissatisfaction experienced during the vulnerable pregnancy period frequently engenders pregnancy-related anxiety, depressive symptoms, weight gain stigma, and disordered eating attitudes [38,39,40,41]. Remarkably, Lebanese pregnant women were found to experience notable levels of depression, anxiety, and disordered eating attitudes [42,43,44,45]. As a result, validated easy-to-use screening instruments for body dissatisfaction during pregnancy are also highly needed in the Lebanese population since early diagnosis of a condition is one of the key factors for a positive prognosis [46, 47].

The psychometric performance and applicability of the EDI were investigated in the context of pregnancy in only one study in Hungary [48], revealing a strong internal consistency for the BDS. However, the analysis necessitated the removal of one item, specifically "I think that my stomach is too big," resulting in the adaptation of eight statements for pregnant women [48]. This modification was justified by the fact that weight gain in anterior body parts is inherent to pregnancy, and a large stomach can therefore be considered normal and acceptable.

Rationale and objectives of the current study

Despite the presence of Arabic validated measures of muscularity-oriented body dissatisfaction (i.e., the Arabic Muscle Dysmorphic Disorder Inventory [49]) and positive body image (i.e., the Arabic body appreciation scale-2 [50]), no prior study has evaluated the suitability and measurement properties of an instrument specific to thinness-oriented body dissatisfaction, a frequent negative aspect of body image. Thinness-oriented body dissatisfaction is a critical construct to examine within cultural contexts, as it reflects the subjective experience of individuals and their perceptions of their own bodies [51], which can be influenced by various socio-cultural factors. For instance, research discovered that as Arab countries modernized and Westernized, younger generations became increasingly fixated with Western ideal standards of body size and shape [52, 53]. Given the unique cultural values, norms, and beauty ideals prevalent in the Lebanese society [54], it is crucial to explore the manifestation and impact of body dissatisfaction among individuals, as this can contribute to a better understanding of the etiology and maintenance of eating disorder symptoms [55,56,57], as well as inform culturally sensitive interventions. Although an Arabic translation of the BDS has been used in previous research [58,59,60], its psychometric properties have not yet been investigated.

Taking all of preceding into account, our study’s objective was to psychometrically validate an Arabic-translated version of the BDS in three different subgroups (i.e., adolescents, adults, and pregnant women). The body dissatisfaction subscale of the EDI was chosen for its widespread use, comparability across studies, comprehensive assessment of thinness-oriented body dissatisfaction dimensions, and established reliability and validity across diverse cultural contexts [13,14,15,16, 18]. We specifically aimed to examine its psychometric performance (i.e., factor structure, reliability, and convergent/divergent validity), as well as its psychometric equivalence (i.e., measurement invariance) between sexes. Namely, divergent validity was assessed using measures of depression and anxiety [57, 61]. In accordance with previous literature showing inverse correlations between body/functionality appreciation and body dissatisfaction [62,63,64], as well as positive associations between body dissatisfaction and eating disorder symptoms [55, 56], measures of eating disorder symptoms, functionality appreciation, and body appreciation were used for establishing convergent validity. Finally, given the well-known cultural differences in pregnancy-related eating behaviors, dietary patterns, and body image concerns [65,66,67,68], we decided to start from the total pool of items and to test the relevance of the item “thinking one’s stomach is too big” in the Arab pregnant women population.

Methods

Study 1: adolescents

Study design and procedures

Between May and June 2020, we conducted a cross-sectional study among Lebanese adolescents. All the information was gathered through the snowball sampling technique by using a Google Form link shared on social media platforms (WhatsApp and Facebook). A copy was sent to their parents in order to obtain parental consent on their participation. A projected completion duration for the questionnaire was included in the project’s social media advertising. Being a resident and citizen of Lebanon was a requirement for participation. The questionnaire’s instruments were given to participants in a pre-randomized order to account for order effects after their parents had given digital informed consent. Participants in the survey responded anonymously, voluntarily, and without payment. At the conclusion of the survey, debriefing materials were distributed to each participant. The participants and their parents were also asked to send the questionnaire to other participants they knew. In total, 555 adolescents were reached.

Questionnaires and measures

The distributed questionnaire was divided into two sections. In the first section, participants were asked to provide demographic information such as their sex and age. Self-reported BMI as kg/m2 was calculated using height and weight data. The household crowding index (HCI), reflecting the socioeconomic status (SES), was calculated by dividing the number of persons by the number of rooms in the house; higher HCI scores reflect lower SES [69].

The second part included the following scales:

The Body Dissatisfaction Scale (BDS) of the Eating Disorder Inventory [17] (for which we report the psychometric properties in this paper): It is a part of the lengthy EDI that evaluates the psychology of eating is this 9-item subscale. The BDS items are used to assess thinness-oriented body dissatisfaction (e.g., “I think my buttocks are too large”), which are scored from 0 (“sometimes/rarely/never”) to 3 (“always”). Five questions are negatively-worded (e.g., “I feel satisfied with the shape of my body”). The total score falls between 0 and 27, and is calculated after reversing the score of negatively-worded items. The higher the sum of items, the higher the body dissatisfaction [17]. The Arabic version was used in a previous paper [58] and can be found as a Additional file 1.

The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9): This short 9-item tool is highly efficacious in depicting depressive disorders [70]. Each item (e.g., “Little interest or pleasure in doing things” and “Feeling down, depressed, or hopeless”) is scored from 0 (“not at all”) to 3 (“nearly every day”), in order to quantify the severity of symptoms [70]. This unidimensional structure of the scale was also been validated in Arabic among the Lebanese population [71] (α = 0.84).

The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A): The HAM-A, a 14-item 5-point Likert instrument, appraised the presence and severity of anxious symptoms (scores between 0 and 56) [72]. Items include “Difficulty in falling asleep, broken sleep, unsatisfying sleep and fatigue on waking, dreams, nightmares, night terrors.”. Lately, this scale was validated in Lebanon [73]. Higher scores indicate higher level of anxiety. (α = 0.89).

The Restraint Scale of the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (DEBQ-R): It is a brief scale that assess the frequency of dieting (e.g., “When you have put on weight, do you eat less than you usually do?” and “Do you try to eat less at meal times than you would like to eat?”). Ten items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale, where response options range between 1 (“never”) to 5 (“always”). Higher scores indicate greater dietary restraint [74]. This scale has also been validated in the Arabic language in Lebanon, with all items loading on one factor [75, 76] (α = 0.92).

The Düsseldorf Orthorexia Scale (DOS): This tool includes ten items measuring orthorexia nervosa tendencies (e.g., feeling distressed after eating unhealthy food, following rules to maintain a healthy diet, etc.), answered on a four-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (“never”) to 4 (“always”) [77]. It was validated in the Arabic language in Lebanon as a one-factor structure [78] (α = 0.85).

Study 2: adults

Study design and procedures

Data collection occurred between December 2021 and April 2022 through a Google Form link. The project was promoted on social media platforms (WhatsApp and Facebook) through the snowball sampling technique, indicating an estimated timeframe for completion. To be eligible for participation, individuals had to be adult residents and citizens of Lebanon. To ensure data integrity, IP addresses were examined to prevent duplicate survey submissions. Upon providing digital informed consent, participants were instructed to complete the aforementioned instruments presented in a randomized order to mitigate any potential order effects. The survey maintained anonymity, and participants voluntarily completed it without receiving any form of compensation. In total, 826 adults were reached.

Questionnaires and measures

The distributed questionnaire was divided into two sections. The first section was the same as study 1. The second section included the following scales:

The Body Dissatisfaction Scale (BDS) of the Eating Disorder Inventory [17]: The description is given in study 1.

The Body Appreciation Scale-2 (BAS-2): This test is composed of 10 items measuring acceptance, respect, and care for one's body, as well as its protection from unattainable beauty standards (e.g., "I respect my body"). The total score is determined by averaging the ratings given for each item, which range from 1 (“never”) to 5 (“always”). Greater body appreciation is reflected in higher scores on this scale [79]. This unidimensional model of the scale is validated in Arabic [50] (α = 0.96).

The Functionality Appreciation Scale (FAS): The FAS is a short 7-item scale assessing the functionality appreciation of one’s own body: a conceptualized construct that goes beyond simple awareness of the body's capabilities to include respect, honor, and appreciation of what it is capable of doing. Items assess a variety of bodily functions, without restriction to a particular domain (e.g., “I appreciate my body for what it is capable of doing” and “I am grateful that my body enables me to engage in activities that I enjoy or find important”) [80]. The unidimensional structure of the scale was validated in the Arabic language among the Lebanese population [81] (α = 0.95).

The Eating Attitudes Test-7 (EAT-7): The EAT-7, validated in the Arabic language in Lebanon as a one-factor structure [82], is a shortened 7-item version of the original EAT-26 [83]. It is used to assess disordered eating attitudes (e.g., “Avoid eating when I am hungry”). Response options range between “infrequently/almost never/ never” (scored as 0) to “always” (scored as 3). The total score range between from 0 and 21, calculated as the sum of all items. Higher sums indicate greater disordered eating attitudes [82, 83] (α = 0.90).

Study 3: pregnant women

Study design and procedures

In June and July 2021, we conducted a cross-sectional study targeting Lebanese pregnant women aged 18 years or older. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the restrictions on face-to-face interviews, we employed the snowball sampling method to adhere to governmental directives. To ensure a wide reach, we created a questionnaire using Google Forms, which included standardized measures. The survey link was then shared through social media platforms such as Facebook and WhatsApp, targeting participants residing in the five districts of Lebanon (Beirut, Mount Lebanon, North, South, and Bekaa). Additionally, women were encouraged to share the link with other pregnant individuals. By adopting a confidential self-administered approach, we aimed to protect privacy, minimize social influences, and maintain the integrity of participants' responses. In total, 433 pregnant women were reached.

Questionnaires and measures

The distributed questionnaire was divided into two sections. The first section was the same as studies 1 and 2. The second section included the following scales:

The Body Dissatisfaction Scale (BDS) of the Eating Disorder Inventory [17]: The description is given in study 1.

The Restraint Scale of the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (DEBQ-R): The description is provided in study 1. In the pregnant women population, α = 0.93.The description is provided in study 1. In the pregnant women population, α = 0.85.

The Arabic version of the Disordered Eating Attitudes in Pregnancy Scale (A-DEAPS): The A-DEAPS is a concise and effective screening tool using Yes-or-No questions. It contains ten questions assessing disordered eating attitudes in pregnancy, such as “I have wanted my pregnancy body to be small, like I am “just bump” (i.e., only my stomach appears to have grown, with no weight or shape changes to other areas of my body)” and “I have attempted to stop the changes occurring to my body during pregnancy”. Bannatyne et al. generated the original DEAPS with the intention of creating a trustworthy tool for screening for disordered eating symptoms unique to pregnancy [84]. The A-DEAPS scores vary between 0 and 10, and higher scores represent increased disordered eating attitudes during pregnancy. The Arabic items converged on one factor solution; the validated version of this scale was used [85] (α = 0.81).

The Lebanese Anxiety Scale (LAS-10): The LAS-10 is a short item designed to assess anxiety symptoms among the Lebanese population, including the following items “I have an anxious mood (worries, anticipation of the worst, fearful anticipation, irritability)” and “I feel that difficulties are piling up so that I cannot overcome them”. The higher the score, the more intense the anxiety. Items of the scale converged on one item [86] (α = 0.90).

Statistical analysis

Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)

There were no missing responses in the dataset. We used data from the second split-half in the adult sample to conduct a CFA using the SPSS AMOS v.29 software. Our intention was to test the BDS model obtained from the EFA results on the first split-half subsample. Evidence of convergent validity was assessed in this subsample in adults and the total sample in adolescents and pregnant women using the average variance extracted (AVE) values of ≥ 0.50 considered adequate [87].

Measurement invariance

To examine sex and BMI invariance of BDS scores, we conducted multi-group CFA [88] using the total samples in adults and adolescents. The BMI variable was dichotomized in two categories (≤ 25 and > 25 kg/m2 in adults and zBMI status (i.e., low-to-average weight [zBMI <  + 1SD] vs. higher weight [zBMI >  + 1SD] in adolescents). Measurement invariance was assessed at the configural, metric, and scalar levels [89]. Configural invariance implies that the latent BDS variable(s) and the pattern of loadings of the latent variable(s) on indicators are similar across sexes (i.e., the unconstrained latent model should fit the data well in both groups). Metric invariance implies that the magnitude of the loadings is similar across sexes; this is tested by comparing two nested models consisting of a baseline model and an invariance model. Scalar invariance implies that both the item loadings and item intercepts are similar across sexes and is examined using the same nested-model comparison strategy as with metric invariance. Lastly, strict invariance implies that residual invariance is equal across groups [88]. We accepted ΔCFI ≤ 0.010 and ΔRMSEA ≤ 0.015 or ΔSRMR ≤ 0.010 as evidence of invariance [88, 90]. We aimed to test for sex differences on latent BDS scores using an independent-samples t-test only if scalar or partial scalar invariance were established.

Further analyses

Reliability analysis in all samples was assessed using McDonald’s ω and Cronbach’s α, with values greater than 0.70 reflecting adequate reliability [91, 92]. The total BDS scores followed a normal distribution, with skewness and kurtosis values varying between − 1 and + 1 [93]. To assess convergent and divergent validity, we examined bivariate correlations between total BDS scores, and the additional measures included in the survey using the Pearson test. Student t test was used to compare two means. Based on Cohen [94], values ≤ 0.10 were considered weak, ~ 0.30 were considered moderate, and ~ 0.50 were considered strong correlations.

Results

Participants

The sociodemographic characteristics of the participants are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 Sociodemographic characteristics of the participants in the three populations
Full size table

Confirmatory factor analysis of different models

A CFA was conducted on each total sample. In adolescents, we applied a correlation between residuals of items 1–3 and 8-F1 (Table 2, Model 2a). In adults; because of high modification indices, we added a correlation between residuals of items 1–2 and 3–4 (Table 2, Model 2b), whereas in pregnant women, we applied correlations between items 1–2 and 2-Factor 2 (Table 2, Model 2c). Consequently, the fit indices improved greatly. The standardized estimates of factor loadings were all adequate (see Table 3). The convergent validity for this model was satisfactory, with the AVE values exceeding 0.5 in all samples. Finally, the McDonald’s omega values were adequate in all samples.

Table 2 Fit indices of the confirmatory factor analyses conducted on the total sample among adolescents, adults, and pregnant women
Full size table
Table 3 Factor loadings derived from the exploratory factor analyses (EFA) and standardized estimates of factor loadings from the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) in all groups
Full size table

Sex invariance

Indices in Table 4 indicate that configural, metric, scalar and partial strict invariance was supported across sexes in the adolescent and adult samples (Table 4). Among adolescents, a significantly higher mean BDS score was found in females (M = 12.81, SD = 6.60) compared to males (M = 11.00, SD = 5.65), t(553) = 2.866, p = 0.004, d = 0.294. Among adults, a significantly higher mean BDS score was found in males (M = 12.49, SD = 4.49) compared to females (M = 11.60, SD = 5.32), t(824) = 2.531, p = 0.012, d = 0.180.

Table 4 Measurement Invariance across Sexes
Full size table

Furthermore, the results in Table 5 indicate that configural, metric, scalar and strict invariance was supported across BMI in the adult sample. A significantly higher body dissatisfaction score was found in overweight/obese participants compared to those with a normal BMI (M = 13.74, SD = 4.65 vs. M = 11.07, SD = 4.94; t(824) = − 7.525, p < 0.001).

Table 5 Measurement invariance across body mass index
Full size table

Convergent and divergent validity

In adolescents, higher body dissatisfaction was significantly associated with greater depression, anxiety, restrained eating, and orthorexia nervosa tendencies (higher DOS scores).

In the adult sample, higher body dissatisfaction was significantly associated with lower body appreciation and lower functionality appreciation as well as higher EAT-7 scores (more disordered/inappropriate eating), indicating convergent validity.

Among pregnant women, higher body dissatisfaction was significantly associated with greater depression, anxiety, restrained eating, and disordered eating attitudes during pregnancy.

Higher BMI was significantly associated with higher body dissatisfaction in adults and adolescents, but not pregnant women (Table 6).

Table 6 Correlation matrix of the scales with the body dissatisfaction subscale scores in all groups
Full size table

Comparison of body dissatisfaction scores between adults and adolescents

No significant difference was found between adults (M = 11.98, SD = 5.01) and adolescents (M = 12.37, SD = 6.42), t(1379) = − 1.205, p = 0.228 in terms of body dissatisfaction scores, pointing to the pervasiveness of body dissatisfaction among age groups in our population.

Discussion

Our findings supported the reliability, cross-sex invariance, factorial validity, and convergent/divergent validity of the BDS in our three study groups. The BDS was reliable, consistent with previous findings across multiple nations [18]. Our findings also showed that the bidimensional component structure of the BDS scores was the same for men and women in both our adult and adolescent populations, in line with a previous study conducted in the US [95]. This property (i.e., sex invariance) allows for meaningful comparisons of thinness-oriented body dissatisfaction between men and women using the BDS.

The two-factor structure yielded by the EFA results had adequate fit to the model in the three populations. Ultimately, scores of the negatively-worded items are reversed, so that the total score reflects and quantifies body dissatisfaction symptoms only. However, since no previous study has approached the factor structure of the BDS in this manner, there are no available reported findings for comparison to ours.

Consistently with our hypothesis, we did not need to eliminate item 1 (i.e., dissatisfied with the size of stomach) in the pregnant women population, in contrast to the Hungarian study [48]. This finding is however congruent with a Delphi consensus study on the symptoms of disordered eating during pregnancy, which highlighted the desire for a small stomach/abdomen size [96]. In point of fact, there is evidence that body dissatisfaction may persist, even escalate, during pregnancy [41, 97]. In addition, distinctly from the well-known types of eating disorder symptoms, a new phenomenon called “Pregorexia” has been increasingly yet sparsely studied over the past few years and identified as an atypical eating-related condition specifically linked to pregnancy [98]. Pregorexia alludes to the attempts deployed by pregnant women to circumvent the natural weight gain in pregnancy through diet and excessive exercise, in order to remain thin during pregnancy [98,99,100]. Women may then exhibit an intense desire for a small pregnant belly [96]. Since this condition has been described in Lebanon [45, 85], this peculiar symptom (i.e., thinking one’s stomach is too big) might have been relevant to some pregnant women in the Lebanese population. The observed incongruities in the BDS factor structure between pregnant women in Lebanon and Hungary thus shed light on the probable higher presence of pregorexia in some societies, including the Lebanese one, compared to others.

In terms of convergent and divergent validity, higher body dissatisfaction scores were significantly associated with greater psychopathology (i.e., depression and anxiety) as well as numerous eating disorder symptoms (i.e., bulimic and anorexic tendencies, restrained eating patterns, orthorexia nervosa tendencies, and pregorexia) in our study. These findings converge to the existing relationships in the literature [5, 41, 56, 59, 75, 76, 101]. For instance, body dissatisfaction had a unique effect on poor general psychological well-being among Hispanic college students of both sexes [5]. Moreover, body dissatisfaction, as measured by the BDS, has been significantly associated with eating disorders such as anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa in the Taiwanese population [22]. On the other hand, we found that body dissatisfaction was inversely correlated with body appreciation and functionality appreciation. Accordingly, prior research has shown that the focus on the body’s functionality over its look may significantly enhance body image [62, 63]. As such, appreciative body functionality is apt to bolster body appreciation and thus reduce negative body image [64].

Overall, all the aforementioned findings provided support for the reliability and construct validity of the Arabic version of the BDS. The results of our study, along with the similarities observed in comparison to international studies, lend support to the cross-cultural applicability of the BDS and its potential usefulness within the Lebanese population.

Limitations and future directions

Despite being the first report providing a validated Arabic tool to assess body image dissatisfaction in Arabic-speaking adults, adolescents, and pregnant women, our study presents some limitations. The cross-sectional design restrained our ability to assess additional psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the BDS, principally test–retest. No scales assessing psychological symptoms among adults were used. Weight and height were self-reported by participants. A selection bias is present since all samples were recruited via the snowball sampling technique (convenience sampling), which hinders the generalizability of the findings. In addition, the results cannot be generalized to other groups, such as children, older adults, and patients with eating disorder symptoms. Further studies adopting longitudinal designs and in other Arabic-speaking countries are still warranted to confirm our findings.

Conclusion

In sum, our findings demonstrated the validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the BDS for evaluating body image dissatisfaction in different community groups, highlighting its applicability among Arabic-speaking people of both sexes as well as during pregnancy. In light of our findings, we endorse the use of the BDS by healthcare professionals in Arabic-speaking countries in order to detect thinness-oriented body dissatisfaction in an appropriate and timely manner and ease early referral to a specialist, thereby preventing the deleterious health-related risks associated with this condition.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are not publicly available due to the restrictions by the ethics committee. The dataset supporting the conclusions is available upon request to the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

BDS:

Body dissatisfaction subscale

EDI:

Eating disorder inventory

BAS-2:

Body appreciation scale-2

FAS:

Functionality appreciation scale

EAT-7:

Eating attitudes test-7

PHQ-9:

Patient health questionnaire

LAS:

Lebanese anxiety scale

DEBQ-R:

Restraint scale of the dutch eating behavior questionnaire

DOS:

Düsseldorf orthorexia scale

A-DEAPS:

Disordered eating attitudes in pregnancy scale

EFA:

Exploratory factor analysis

KMO:

Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin

PA:

Parallel analysis

WRMSR:

Weighted root mean square residual

CFA:

Confirmatory factor analysis

AVE:

Average variance extracted

US:

United States

References

  1. Holmqvist K, Frisén A. Body dissatisfaction across cultures: Findings and research problems. Eur Eat Disord Rev: Prof J Eat Disord Assoc. 2010;18(2):133–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. He J, Sun S, Lin Z, Fan X. Body dissatisfaction and sexual orientations: a quantitative synthesis of 30 years research findings. Clin Psychol Rev. 2020;81: 101896.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Weinberger N, Kersting A, Riedel-Heller SG, Luck-Sikorski C. Body dissatisfaction in individuals with obesity compared to normal-weight individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Facts. 2016;9(6):424–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Sutter C, Nishina A, Adams RE. How you look versus how you feel: associations between BMI z-score, body dissatisfaction, peer victimization, and self-worth for African American and white adolescents. J Adolesc. 2015;43:20–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ganem PA, de Heer H, Morera OF. Does body dissatisfaction predict mental health outcomes in a sample of predominantly Hispanic college students? Personal Individ Differ. 2009;46(4):557–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gonçalves L, Zanlorenci S, Borges LL, de Lima TR, Silva DAS. Body weight dissatisfaction and health risk behaviors in adolescents. Percept Mot Skills. 2023;130(1):340–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rodríguez-Cano T, Beato-Fernández L, Llario AB. Body dissatisfaction as a predictor of self-reported suicide attempts in adolescents: a Spanish community prospective study. J Adolesc Health. 2006;38(6):684–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hockey A, Barlow FK, Shiels AL, Donovan CL. Body dissatisfaction in midlife women: the applicability of the tripartite influence model. Body Image. 2021;39:202–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rakhkovskaya LM, Holland JM. Body dissatisfaction in older adults with a disabling health condition. J Health Psychol. 2017;22(2):248–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim D. Body image dissatisfaction as an important contributor to suicidal ideation in Korean adolescents: gender difference and mediation of parent and peer relationships. J Psychosom Res. 2009;66(4):297–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brown TA, Forney KJ, Klein KM, Grillot C, Keel PK. A 30-year longitudinal study of body weight, dieting, and eating pathology across women and men from late adolescence to later midlife. J Abnorm Psychol. 2020;129(4):376.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kling J, Kwakkenbos L, Diedrichs PC, et al. Systematic review of body image measures. Body Image. 2019;30:170–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.06.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Karazsia BT, Murnen SK, Tylka TL. Is body dissatisfaction changing across time? A cross-temporal meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2017;143(3):293.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tomba E, Tecuta L, Crocetti E, Squarcio F, Tomei G. Residual eating disorder symptoms and clinical features in remitted and recovered eating disorder patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Int J Eat Disord. 2019;52(7):759–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jebeile H, Gow ML, Baur LA, Garnett SP, Paxton SJ, Lister NB. Treatment of obesity, with a dietary component, and eating disorder risk in children and adolescents: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2019;20(9):1287–98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Panão I, Carraça EV. Effects of exercise motivations on body image and eating habits/behaviours: a systematic review. Nutr Diet. 2020;77(1):41–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Garner DM, Olmstead MP, Polivy J. Development and validation of a multidimensional eating disorder inventory for anorexia nervosa and bulimia. Int J Eat Disord. 1983;2(2):15–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gleaves DH, Pearson CA, Ambwani S, Morey LC. Measuring eating disorder attitudes and behaviors: a reliability generalization study. J Eat Disord. 2014;2:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Norring C, Sohlberg S. Eating disorder inventory in Sweden: description, cross-cultural comparison, and clinical utility. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1988;78(5):567–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nyman-Carlsson E, Engström I, Norring C, Nevonen L. Eating disorder inventory-3, validation in Swedish patients with eating disorders, psychiatric outpatients and a normal control sample. Nord J Psychiatry. 2015;69(2):142–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee S, Lee AM, Leung T, Yu H. Psychometric properties of the eating disorders inventory (EDI-1) in a nonclinical Chinese population in Hong Kong. Int J Eat Disord. 1997;21(2):187–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tseng MM, Yao G, Hu F, Chen K, Fang D. Psychometric properties of the eating disorder inventory in clinical and nonclinical populations in Taiwan. Assessment. 2014;21(1):50–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee J, Shin M, Jo H, Jung Y, Kim J, Kim KR. Validation of the Korean version of the eating disorder inventory-2: psychometric properties and cross-cultural comparison. Yonsei Med J. 2012;53(6):1099–106.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Rathner G, Rumpold G. Convergent validity of the eating disorder inventory and the anorexia nervosa inventory for self-rating in an austrian nonclinical population. Int J Eat Disord. 1994;16(4):381–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lizana-Calderón P, Cruzat-Mandich C, Díaz-Castrillón F, Alvarado JM, Compte EJ. Psychometric properties of the eating disorder inventory-3 (EDI-3) in Chilean youth. Front Psychol. 2022;13:298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tachi T, Kusano-Schwarz M, Murakami K, Kobayashi Y, Miyake Y. Usefulness of the eating disorder inventory-2 Japanese version in patients with eating disorders. Tokai J Exp Clin Med. 2007;32(3):78–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Williams RL, Schaefer CA, Shisslak CM, Gronwaldt VH, Comerci GD. Eating attitudes and behaviors in adolescent women: discrimination of normals, dieters, and suspected bulimics using the eating attitudes test and eating disorder inventory. Int J Eat Disord. 1986;5(5):879–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Salbach-Andrae H, Schneider N, Bürger A, Pfeiffer E, Lehmkuhl U, Holzhausen M. Psychometric properties of the eating disorder inventory (EDI-2) in adolescents. Zeitschrift fur Kinder-und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie. 2010;38(3):219–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rutsztein G, Leonardelli E, Scappatura ML, Murawski B, Elizathe L, Maglio AL. Psychometric properties of the eating disorders inventory-3 (EDI-3) among female adolescents from Argentina. Revista mexicana de trastornos alimentarios. 2013;4(1):1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Maiano C, Morin AJ, Monthuy-Blanc J, Garbarino J, Ninot G. Development and validity of a very short form of the eating disorder inventory. Compr Psychiatry. 2016;65:141–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Garner DM. Eating disorder inventory-2. Psychological assessment resources Odessa. 1991

  32. Al-Subaie AS, Bamgboye E, Al-Shammari S, Al-Sabhan KN, Al-Shehri SN, Bannah ARS. Validity of the Arabic version of the eating disorders inventory (EDI). Br J Psychiatry. 1996;168(5):636–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M, Skouteris H, Watson BE, Hill B. Body dissatisfaction during pregnancy: a systematic review of cross-sectional and prospective correlates. J Health Psychol. 2013;18(11):1411–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hodgkinson EL, Smith DM, Wittkowski A. Women’s experiences of their pregnancy and postpartum body image: a systematic review and meta-synthesis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Watson B, Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M, Broadbent J, Skouteris H. The meaning of body image experiences during the perinatal period: a systematic review of the qualitative literature. Body Image. 2015;14:102–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Roomruangwong C, Kanchanatawan B, Sirivichayakul S, Maes M. High incidence of body image dissatisfaction in pregnancy and the postnatal period: associations with depression, anxiety, body mass index and weight gain during pregnancy. Sexual Reprod Healthc. 2017;13:103–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bjelica A, Cetkovic N, Trninic-Pjevic A, Mladenovic-Segedi L. The phenomenon of pregnancy - a psychological view. Ginekol Pol. 2018;89(2):102–6. https://doi.org/10.5603/GP.a2018.0017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Dryer R, Chee P, Brunton R. The role of body dissatisfaction and self-compassion in pregnancy-related anxiety. J Affect Disord. 2022;313:84–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Chan CY, Lee AM, Koh YW, et al. Associations of body dissatisfaction with anxiety and depression in the pregnancy and postpartum periods: a longitudinal study. J Affect Disord. 2020;263:582–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hill IF, Angrish K, Nutter S, Ramos-Salas X, Minhas H, Nagpal TS. Exploring body dissatisfaction in pregnancy and the association with gestational weight gain, obesity, and weight stigma. Midwifery. 2023;119: 103627.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Coker E, Abraham S. Body weight dissatisfaction before, during and after pregnancy: a comparison of women with and without eating disorders. Eat Weight Disord. 2015;20(1):71–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-014-0133-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Gerges S, Obeid S, Hallit S. Traversing mental health disorders during pregnancy: Lebanese women’s experiences of antepartum depression and anxiety. Ir J Med Sci. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-023-03371-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Gerges S, DiPietro JA, Obeid S, Fekih-Romdhane F, Hallit S. Psychometric performance assessment of the Arabic version of the pregnancy experience scale–brief version (PES–brief) in an Arabic-speaking population. J Psychosom Res. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2023.111499.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Gerges S, Obeid S, Hallit S. Associations between eating attitudes, mental health, and sexual dysfunction during pregnancy. J Sex Marital Ther. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2022.2149937.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Gerges S, Obeid S, Hallit S. Pregnancy through the Looking-Glass: correlates of disordered eating attitudes among a sample of Lebanese pregnant women. BMC Psych. 2023;23(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-05205-w.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kisely S, Scott A, Denney J, Simon G. Duration of untreated symptoms in common mental disorders: association with outcomes: International study. Br J Psychiatry. 2006;189(1):79–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Austin A, Flynn M, Richards K, et al. Duration of untreated eating disorder and relationship to outcomes: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2021;29(3):329–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Dukay-Szabó S, Simon D, Varga M, et al. The applicability of the Eating Disorder Inventory in pregnancy. Eat Weight Disord-Stud Anorexia, Bulimia Obesity. 2022;27(2):629–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Fekih-Romdhane F, Merhy G, Moubarak V, et al. Validation of the Arabic version of the muscle dysmorphic disorder inventory (Ar-MDDI) among Lebanese male university students. J Eat Disord. 2023;11(1):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Fekih-Romdhane F, Azzi V, Malaeb D, Sarray El Dine A, Obeid S, Hallit S. Psychometric properties of an Arabic translation of the body appreciation scale (BAS-2) and its short forms (BAS-2SF) in a community sample of Lebanese adults. J Eating Disord. 2023;11(1):160. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-023-00885-xe.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Grogan S. Body image: understanding body dissatisfaction in men, women and children. Routledge; 2021

  52. Khaled S, Shockley B, Qutteina Y, Kimmel L, Trung K. Testing Western media icons influence on Arab women’s body size and shape ideals: an experimental approach. Social Sci. 2018;7(9):142. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7090142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Melisse B, de Beurs E, van Furth EF. Eating disorders in the Arab world: a literature review. J Eat Disord. 2020;8(1):1–59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-020-00336-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Fares K, Hallit S, Haddad C, Akel M, Khachan T, Obeid S. Relationship between cosmetics use, self-esteem, and self-perceived attractiveness among Lebanese women. J Cosmet Sci. 2019;70(1):47–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Stice E, Shaw HE. Role of body dissatisfaction in the onset and maintenance of eating pathology: a synthesis of research findings. J Psychosom Res. 2002;53(5):985–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Lantz EL, Gaspar ME, DiTore R, Piers AD, Schaumberg K. Conceptualizing body dissatisfaction in eating disorders within a self-discrepancy framework: a review of evidence. Eat Weight Disord-Stud Anorexia, Bulimia Obesity. 2018;23:275–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Wilson RE, Latner JD, Hayashi K. More than just body weight: the role of body image in psychological and physical functioning. Body Image. 2013;10(4):644–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Haddad C, Zakhour M, Akel M, et al. Factors associated with body dissatisfaction among the Lebanese population. Eat Weight Disord-Stud Anorexia, Bulimia Obesity. 2019;24:507–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Al-Musharaf S, Rogoza R, Mhanna M, Soufia M, Obeid S, Hallit S. Factors of body dissatisfaction among Lebanese adolescents: the indirect effect of self-esteem between mental health and body dissatisfaction. BMC Pediatr. 2022;22(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Haddad C, Zakhour M, Sacre H, et al. Variation of psychological and anthropometrics measures before and after dieting and factors associated with body dissatisfaction and quality of life in a Lebanese clinical sample. BMC Psychol. 2021;9(1):1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Davison TE, McCabe MP. Relationships between men’s and women’s body image and their psychological, social, and sexual functioning. Sex Roles. 2005;52:463–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Alleva JM, Martijn C, Van Breukelen GJ, Jansen A, Karos K. Expand Your Horizon: a programme that improves body image and reduces self-objectification by training women to focus on body functionality. Body Image. 2015;15:81–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Alleva JM, Veldhuis J, Martijn C. A pilot study investigating whether focusing on body functionality can protect women from the potential negative effects of viewing thin-ideal media images. Body Image. 2016;17:10–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Alleva JM, Diedrichs PC, Halliwell E, et al. A randomised-controlled trial investigating potential underlying mechanisms of a functionality-based approach to improving women’s body image. Body Image. 2018;25:85–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Chakona G, Shackleton C. Food taboos and cultural beliefs influence food choice and dietary preferences among pregnant women in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Nutrients. 2019;11(11):2668.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Hussain B, Bardi JN, Fatima T. Pregnancy related cultural food practices among Pakistani women in the UK: a qualitative study. Br J Midwifery. 2021;29(7):402–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Vasilevski V, Carolan-Olah M. Food taboos and nutrition-related pregnancy concerns among Ethiopian women. J Clin Nurs. 2016;25(19–20):3069–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Maggiulli O, Rufo F, Johns SE, Wells JC. Food taboos during pregnancy: meta-analysis on cross cultural differences suggests specific, diet-related pressures on childbirth among agriculturalists. PeerJ. 2022;10: e13633.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Melki IS, Beydoun HA, Khogali M, Tamim H, Yunis KA. Household crowding index: a correlate of socioeconomic status and inter-pregnancy spacing in an urban setting. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004;58:476–80. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2003.012690.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW. The PHQ-9. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(9):606–13. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Dagher D, Samaha S, Mhanna M, Azzi R, Mina A, Soufia M, Hallit S, Obeid S, Haddad G. Depressive symptoms among a sample of Lebanese adolescents: Scale validation and correlates with disordered eating. Arch Pediatr. 2023;30(6):401-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcped.2023.04.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Hamilton M. The assessment of anxiety states by rating. Br J Med Psychol. 1959;32(1):50–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8341.1959.tb00467.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Hallit S, Haddad C, Hallit R, et al. Validation of the hamilton anxiety rating scale and state trait anxiety inventory A and B in Arabic among the Lebanese population. Clin Epidemiol Global Health. 2020;8(4):1104–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2020.03.028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. van Strien T, Frijters JER, van Staveren WA, Defares PB, Deurenberg P. The predictive validity of the Dutch restrained eating scale. Int J Eat Disord. 1986;5(4):747–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-108X(198605)5:43.0.CO;2-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Saade S, Hallit S, Haddad C, et al. Factors associated with restrained eating and validation of the Arabic version of the restrained eating scale among an adult representative sample of the Lebanese population: a cross-sectional study. J Eat Disord. 2019;7(1):24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-019-0254-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Boulos Nakhoul T, Mina A, Soufia M, Obeid S, Hallit S. Restrained eating in Lebanese adolescents: scale validation and correlates. BMC Pediatr. 2021;21(1):257. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-021-02728-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Barthels F, Meyer F, Pietrowsky R. Die Düsseldorfer orthorexie skala–konstruktion und evaluation eines fragebogens zur erfassung ortho-rektischen ernährungsverhaltens. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie. 2015

  78. Rogoza R, Hallit S, Soufia M, Barthels F, Obeid S. Validation of the arabic version of the dusseldorf orthorexia scale (DOS) among Lebanese adolescents. J Eat Disord. 2021;9:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Tylka TL, Wood-Barcalow NL. The body appreciation scale-2: item refinement and psychometric evaluation. Body Image. 2015;12:53–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Alleva JM, Tylka TL, Van Diest AMK. The functionality appreciation scale (FAS): development and psychometric evaluation in US community women and men. Body Image. 2017;23:28–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Swami V, Todd J, Azzi V, et al. Psychometric properties of an Arabic translation of the functionality appreciation scale (FAS) in Lebanese adults. Body Image. 2022;42:361–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Fekih-Romdhane F, Obeid S, Malaeb D, Hallit R, Hallit S. Validation of a shortened version of the eating attitude test (EAT-7) in the Arabic language. J Eat Disord. 2022;10(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Garner DM, Olmsted MP, Bohr Y, Garfinkel PE. The eating attitudes test: psychometric features and clinical correlates. Psychol Med. 1982;12(4):871–8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291700049163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Bannatyne AJ. Disordered eating in pregnancy: the development and validation of a pregnancy-specific screening instrument. Bond University; 2018

  85. Gerges S, Obeid S, Hallit S. Initial psychometric properties of an Arabic version of the disordered eating attitudes in pregnancy scale (A-DEAPS) among Lebanese pregnant women. J Eat Disord. 2022;10(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-022-00710-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Hallit S, Obeid S, Haddad C, et al. Construction of the Lebanese Anxiety Scale (LAS-10): a new scale to assess anxiety in adult patients. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2020;24(3):270–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/13651501.2020.1744662.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Malhotra N, Hall J, Shaw M, Oppenheim P. Marketing research: an applied orientation. Burwood: Deakin University; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Chen FF. Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Struct Equ Model. 2007;14(3):464–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Vandenberg RJ, Lance CE. A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organ Res Methods. 2000;3(1):4–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Cheung GW, Rensvold RB. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Struct Equ Model. 2002;9(2):233–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Dunn TJ, Baguley T, Brunsden V. From alpha to omega: a practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. Br J Psychol. 2014;105(3):399–412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. McNeish D. Thanks coefficient alpha, we’ll take it from here. Psychol Methods. 2018;23(3):412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Hair JJ, Hult G, Ringle C, Sarstedt M. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Cambridge: SAGE Publications; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Cohen J. Quantitative methods in psychology: A power primer. Psychological Bulletin

  95. Spillane NS, Boerner LM, Anderson KG, Smith GT. Comparability of the Eating Disorder Inventory-2 between women and men. Assessment. 2004;11(1):85–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Bannatyne AJ, Hughes R, Stapleton P, Watt B, MacKenzie-Shalders K. Signs and symptoms of disordered eating in pregnancy: a Delphi consensus study. BMC Preg Childbirth. 2018;18(1):262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Larsson G, Andersson-Ellström A. Experiences of pregnancy-related body shape changes and of breast-feeding in women with a history of eating disorders. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2003;11(2):116–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Mathieu J. What is pregorexia? J Am Diet Assoc. 2009;109(6):976–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2009.04.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Mandera A, Pawlikowska A, Szuster EM, Całkosiński A, Kostrzewska P, Majewski M. The pregorexia - anorexia during the pregnancy. J Educat. 2019;9(5):137–44. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2718477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Saleem T, Saleem S, Shoib S, Shah J, Ali SA. A rare phenomenon of pregorexia in Pakistani women: need to understand the related behaviors. J Eat Disord. 2022;10(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Mhanna M, Azzi R, Hallit S, Obeid S, Soufia M. Correlates of orthorexia nervosa in a sample of Lebanese adolescents: the co-moderating effect of body dissatisfaction and self-esteem between mental health issues and orthorexia nervosa. Vulner Child Youth Stud. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450128.2022.2163732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Drs. Mariam Mhanna, Anthony Mina, Serena Samaha, Reine Azzi, and Vanessa Azzi for assistance with data collection.

Funding

None.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Feten Fekih-Romdhane and Souheil Hallit are last coauthors.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Holy Spirit University of Kaslik, P.O. Box 446, Jounieh, Lebanon

    Sarah Gerges, Rabih Hallit, Michel Soufia & Souheil Hallit

  2. Department of Social and Education Sciences, School of Arts and Sciences, Lebanese American University, Byblos, Lebanon

    Sahar Obeid

  3. College of Pharmacy, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates

    Diana Malaeb

  4. Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Arts and Sciences, Lebanese International University, Beirut, Lebanon

    Abir Sarray El Dine

  5. Department of Infectious Disease, Bellevue Medical Center, Mansourieh, Lebanon

    Rabih Hallit

  6. Department of Infectious Disease, Notre Dame Des Secours, University Hospital Center, Byblos, Lebanon

    Rabih Hallit

  7. The Tunisian Center of Early Intervention in Psychosis, Department of Psychiatry “Ibn Omrane”, Razi Hospital, 2010, Manouba, Tunisia

    Feten Fekih-Romdhane

  8. Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Tunis El Manar University, Tunis, Tunisia

    Feten Fekih-Romdhane

  9. Applied Science Research Center, Applied Science Private University, Amman, 11931, Jordan

    Souheil Hallit

  10. Research Department, Psychiatric Hospital of the Cross, P.O. Box 60096, Jal Eddib, Lebanon

    Souheil Hallit

Authors
  1. Sarah Gerges
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sahar Obeid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Diana Malaeb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Abir Sarray El Dine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rabih Hallit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Michel Soufia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Feten Fekih-Romdhane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Souheil Hallit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SG, FFR, and SH designed the study; SG, ASD, and DM collected the data, SG drafted the manuscript; SH carried out the analysis and interpreted the results; all authors reviewed the final manuscript and gave their consent.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sahar Obeid or Souheil Hallit.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

For the adults’ sample, the ethics approval was obtained from the Ethics and Research Committee of the Psychiatric Hospital of the Cross (approval code: HPC-038-2021). For adolescents’ sample, the Ethics and Research Committee of the Psychiatric Hospital of the Cross approved this study protocol (HPC-035-2020). Students were asked to get their parents’ consent before filling the survey. For pregnant women, the Psychiatric Hospital of the Cross Ethics and Research Committee approved this study protocol (HPC-014–2021). A written informed consent was considered obtained from each participant when submitting the online form. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Body dissatisfaction subscale of the eating disorder inventory-second version EDI-2.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gerges, S., Obeid, S., Malaeb, D. et al. Validation of an Arabic version of the eating disorder inventory’s body dissatisfaction subscale among adolescents, adults, and pregnant women. J Eat Disord 11, 187 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-023-00911-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-023-00911-y

Keywords

Journal of Eating Disorders

ISSN: 2050-2974