Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Childhood maltreatment, shame, psychological distress, and binge eating: testing a serial mediational model

Journal of Eating Disorders volume 11, Article number: 96 (2023) Cite this article

A Correction to this article was published on 19 December 2023

This article has been updated

Abstract

Objective

Despite evidence of causal relationships between childhood maltreatment and the development of binge eating disorder (BED), research on mediating mechanisms is lacking. The present study sought to understand the childhood maltreatment-binge eating relationship more fully by examining three types of shame (internal, external, body) and psychological distress as mediators in this relationship. There is evidence that shame and psychological distress are associated with both childhood maltreatment and binge eating pathology. It was hypothesised that shame stemming from childhood maltreatment would contribute to psychological distress, and to binge eating as a dysfunctional emotion regulation strategy, in a serial mediational model.

Method

Five hundred and thirty adults with self-reported binge eating symptoms completed an online survey, which included measures of childhood maltreatment, internal shame, external shame, body shame, psychological distress, and binge eating and other eating disorder symptoms.

Results

Path analyses showed three specific relationships: (1) a relationship between childhood emotional maltreatment and binge eating, which was serially mediated by internal shame and psychological distress; (2) a relationship between childhood sexual abuse and binge eating, which was mediated by body shame; and (3) a relationship between childhood physical maltreatment and binge eating, which was mediated by psychological distress. We also found a feedback loop, whereby binge eating might lead to increased overvaluation of body shape and weight (possibly due to increased weight) and then to an increase in internal shame and body shame. The final model showed excellent fit for the data.

Discussion

Findings extend our understanding of the link between childhood maltreatment and BED. Future intervention research should focus on examining the efficacy of interventions for different forms of childhood maltreatment, based on the key mediating factors.

Plain English summary

Despite research showing a clear link between past childhood maltreatment (e.g., childhood emotional abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse, neglect) and developing binge eating disorder as an adult, research cannot currently fully explain why this link exists. In this study, we explored several ways that childhood maltreatment might lead to binge eating. We examined whether different types of childhood maltreatment led to increased levels of shame or psychological distress (e.g., symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress), and whether increased shame or psychological distress then contributed to the use of binge eating as a strategy to manage these emotions (e.g., through emotional binge eating). The results of our study showed that specific types of childhood maltreatment did lead to increased shame and binge eating. For instance, we found that adults who had experienced childhood emotional abuse tended to experience higher levels of shame about themselves, as well as higher levels of psychological distress and higher levels of binge eating. Findings from this study suggest that specific types of therapy (e.g., compassion-focused therapy for eating disorders for high levels of shame in eating disorders) might be useful for adults who have experienced childhood maltreatment and experience high levels of shame and psychological distress that accompany their binge eating.

Introduction

Research consistently shows a link between childhood maltreatment and the development of eating disorders (EDs) [10]. Prevalence rates of childhood maltreatment appear to be approximately two to four-fold higher in the ED population compared to the general population, with adults with EDs who have experienced childhood maltreatment reporting earlier age of ED onset and more severe illness presentation [50]. Across ED type, bulimia nervosa (BN) and binge eating disorder (BED) show the highest rates of childhood maltreatment [10, 50]. Within BED, estimates of child maltreatment range from 52 to 83%. The most frequently reported types of childhood maltreatment within BED are childhood emotional neglect (CEN; 49–69%), childhood emotional abuse (CEA; 46–59%), childhood physical neglect (CPN; 32–50%), childhood physical abuse (CPA; 28–36%), and childhood sexual abuse (CSA; 26–32%), respectively [1, 5, 33]. Limited past research in this area has found links between CEA and binge eating via self-criticism [25] and anger [24], as well as from CEA and CPN to binge eating via alexithymia [49]. However, mediating mechanisms in the childhood maltreatment-BED relationship across all five forms of childhood maltreatment have not been thoroughly explored [59].

The link between childhood maltreatment and the development of psychological disorders in adulthood is well documented [38]. For example, among adults with BED, links have been found between CEA and dysthymic disorder, from CSA and CPN to post-traumatic stress disorder, and between CPA and alcohol use disorder [5]. These aetiological pathways suggest that childhood maltreatment contributes to increased psychological distress which persists into adulthood. The link between psychological distress and the development of binge eating and BED is also well-established [68], explained broadly by the use of binge eating as a dysfunctional strategy to regulate mood [53, 55]. However, it remains unclear how specific emotional or self-evaluative processes might mediate the relationship between childhood maltreatment and psychological distress in the BED population.

A presently unexplored factor which might explain the link between childhood maltreatment and psychological distress is shame. The experience of chronic shame is a known consequence of childhood maltreatment [15], and is also linked to the development and maintenance of BED [57]. Shame can be defined as a self-evaluative emotion characterised by global, negative self-evaluations, or the perception of having one’s flaws exposed [64]. Shame can be further categorised as either internally focussed, the experience of negative self-judgement and feelings of inadequacy and inferiority (‘internal shame’) or externally focussed, the perception of negative evaluations from others about the self (‘external shame’) [27]. ‘Body shame’ describes feelings of inadequacy focussed specifically on one’s appearance and body, and is also predicted by childhood maltreatment [6].

Both internal shame and external shame are linked to childhood maltreatment [45, 66]. Specifically, CEA and CEN have been linked to the development of internal shame [61, 66]. The relationship between childhood maltreatment and external shame is less clear, with several studies finding a relationship between childhood adverse experiences such as peer victimisation, as well as experiences of criticism and rejection by parents to external shame [18, 74]. Furthermore, two of these studies [61, 74] found that internal and external shame then predicted depressive symptoms which are indicative of psychological distress [17].

Several studies have found that CSA is linked to the development of body shame [3, 48, 69] and internal shame [71]. Furthermore, the review by Whiffen and MacIntosh [71] found that internal shame and body shame were key mediators in the relationship between CSA and emotional distress. These findings suggest that there are a range of pathways from childhood maltreatment to the development of psychological distress: from CEA, CEN, and CSA via internal shame, from childhood maltreatment via external shame, and from CSA via body shame.

Internal shame, external shame, and body shame have also been linked to the development of BED [57]. There is a general lack of research examining early experiences as a predictor of shame in the BED population, however recent research indicates that early shame-inducing memories [18] and experiences of body shaming [20] play a role in the development of shame in the BED population.

Considering the links between childhood maltreatment and psychological distress via the three types of shame, as well as the link between psychological distress and the development of BED [68], it is possible that the relationship between childhood maltreatment and the development of BED may be serially mediated by shame and psychological distress. A better understanding of the mechanisms mediating the childhood maltreatment-BED relationship is critical for the development of targeted psychological treatment for the significant proportion of individuals with BED with a history of childhood maltreatment.

The current study

The primary aim of this study was to examine mediating factors in the relationship between childhood maltreatment and binge eating pathology. Specifically, the study examined whether three types of shame (internal, external, body) and psychological distress independently or serially mediated the link between five types of childhood maltreatment (CEA, CPA, CSA, CEN, CPN) and binge eating pathology. We expected different types of shame stemming from childhood maltreatment would contribute to psychological distress and then binge eating as a coping strategy. Considering previous research, we hypothesised that:

  1. 1.

    The relationship between CEA, CEN, and CSA to binge eating would be serially mediated by internal shame and psychological distress;

  2. 2.

    The relationship between childhood maltreatment and binge eating would be serially mediated by external shame and psychological distress; and

  3. 3.

    The relationships between CSA to binge eating would be serially mediated by body shame and psychological distress.

Method

Participants and procedure

Adults (≥ 18 years old) with self-reported binge eating symptoms were eligible for study participation. Participants were recruited from July 2021 to January 2022 through an online advertisement linked to an online survey, which was placed on ED, BED, and overeating support forums and social media platforms. Consent was obtained prior to beginning the survey. Participants were invited to enter a draw to receive a gift card valued at $100AUD at the completion of the survey. All procedures were approved by an institutional Human Research Ethics Committee (project 20215477-8486). Participants with a score below 17 on the Binge Eating Scale (n = 58), indicating non-pathological levels of binge eating [28], were removed from analysis. The total sample (N = 530) was predominantly female, White, residing in a western country, holding a bachelor’s degree or other tertiary qualification, and at the low end of the ‘obese’ body mass index (BMI) category [73]. Table 1 shows detailed participant demographics.

Table 1 Participant demographics
Full size table

The sample was further categorised into two subgroups according to whether or not individuals met probable criteria for bulimia nervosa (BN) based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) criteria [2] using the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q). Probable BN was defined as (a) ≥ four episodes of objective binge eating accompanied by a sense of loss of control, and (b) ≥ four episodes of purging (vomiting and/or laxative use), and/or (c) ≥ 13 episodes of fasting (8 waking hours or more), and/or (d) ≥ 20 episodes of excessive exercise in the last 28 days [42, 51]. According to these criteria, a subset of the total sample (n = 167; 31.5%) met criteria for BN.

Survey measures

Demographic information

Demographic questions included sex, age, height and weight, ethnicity, country of residence, and highest level of education completed.

Adverse childhood experiences-questionnaire (ACE-Q)

The ACE-Q [26] is a 10-item dichotomous (yes/no) measure of 10 types of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) that have occurred in childhood (< 18 years old), five involving child maltreatment (emotional abuse [CEA], physical abuse [CPA], sexual abuse [CSA], emotional neglect [CEN], or physical neglect [CPN]). These five types of childhood maltreatment were examined due to their high prevalence in the BED population [33, 50]. The ACE-Q shows strong test–retest reliability [22] and concurrent validity [54, 65]. In the present sample, Cronbach’s alpha was 0.67.

Internalised shame scale–shame subscale (ISS-S)

The ISS-S [12] is the 24-item subscale of the internalised shame scale (ISS) which measures internal shame. Items are rated on a scale from 0 (never) to 4 (almost always). Items are summed to provide a global score (0–96), with higher scores indicating a greater degree of internal shame. The ISS-S shows good internal consistency and concurrent validity [16]. In the present sample, Cronbach’s alpha was 0.95.

Other as shamer scale-2 (OAS-2)

The OAS-2 [44] is an 8-item short form version of the other as shamer scale which measures external shame. Items are rated on a scale from 0 (never) to 4 (almost always). Items are summed to provide a global score (0–32), with higher scores indicating a greater degree of external shame. The OAS-2 shows good internal consistency and concurrent validity [44]. In the present sample, Cronbach’s alpha was 0.92.

Body image shame scale (BISS)

The BISS [19, 21] is a 14-item measure of body shame. Items are rated on a scale from 0 (never) to 4 (almost always). Items are summed to provide a global score (0–56), with higher scores indicating a greater degree of body shame. The BISS shows very good internal consistency and concurrent validity [19, 21]. In the present sample, Cronbach’s alpha was 0.91.

Depression anxiety stress scale-21 (DASS-21)

The DASS-21 [41] is a 21-item measure of depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms. Items are rated on a scale from 0 (never) to 3 (almost always). Items are summed and multiplied by two to provide a global score (0–126), with higher scores indicating a greater degree of psychological distress. The DASS-21 shows good internal consistency and concurrent validity [56]. In the present sample, Cronbach’s alpha was 0.92.

Binge eating scale (BES)

The BES [30] is a 16-item measure of binge eating symptoms. Items comprise three to four response options, which correspond to a level of severity on a range from 0 to 3. Items are summed to provide a global score (0–46), with higher scores indicating a greater degree of binge eating. Global scores can be categorised into subclinical/minimal binge eating (≤ 17), moderate binge eating (18–26), and severe binge eating (≥ 27). The BES shows good internal consistency and concurrent validity [11], and is considered a valid screening tool for clinically significant binge eating (score ≥ 18) [19, 21]. In the present sample, Cronbach’s alpha was 0.80.

Eating disorder examination-questionnaire (EDE-Q)

The EDE-Q [23] is a 28-item measure of eating disorder cognitions and behaviours. Twenty-two items are rated on a scale from 0 (no days) to 6 (every day) and subscale items are summed and divided by number of items to provide four subscale scores (0–6): restrained eating, eating concern, weight concern, and shape concern. To measure overvaluation of shape and weight, the subscales weight concern and shape concern were summed and divided by two. Six items measure the frequency of eating disorder behaviours (e.g., episodes of loss-of-control binge eating, vomiting, laxative use, overexercise) experienced in the last 28 days, and which were used in the present study to classify probable ED diagnoses. The EDE-Q is considered the gold standard as a questionnaire-based assessment of eating disorder symptoms and probable eating disorder diagnosis [52].

Results

Descriptive statistics

There was no missing data. Descriptive and correlational analysis were conducted using IBM SPSS software (version 28). Multicollinearity was assessed using the variance inflation factor (VIF); VIF values above five were considered problematic [14]. As all independent variables had a VIF below five, collinearity was considered acceptable.

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) calculations were used to assess gender differences across all measures. No significant differences were found across gender according to binge eating symptoms (F[2, 527] = 2.01, p = 0.14) or body shame (F[2, 527] = 1.32, p = 0.27). Tukey’s post-hoc tests showed significant (p < 0.05) gender differences across psychological distress (F[2, 527] = 8.23, p < 0.001), external shame (F[2, 527] = 4.86, p = 0.008) and internal shame (F[2, 527] = 6.22, p = 0.002), with non-binary individuals experiencing higher levels of psychological distress, external shame and internal shame than female or male individuals. While these findings are consistent with research indicating that non-binary individuals experience higher rates of depression and shame than those who identify with their sex assigned at birth [60, 63], they were not considered problematic for analysis due to the small size of this subgroup (9.06%) in the total sample. As expected (Table 2), all variables showed significant positive correlations. The four potential mediating factors (internal shame, external shame, body shame, psychological distress) were all significantly associated with childhood maltreatment and binge eating pathology, indicating that they should be considered as mediating variables.

Table 2 Means, standard deviations, and pearson correlations between study variables (N = 530)
Full size table

Path analyses

Path analyses were performed with IBM SPSS Amos software (version 26) using the maximum-likelihood estimation method. In line with the recommendations of Browne and Cudeck [7] and Hu and Bentler [37], the following fit indices were used to evaluate acceptable fit: comparative fit index (CFI) ≥ 0.95, standardized root-mean-square residual (SRMR) ≤ 0.08, and the root-mean-square error of approximation (RMSEA) ≤ 0.08. The resampling method bootstrap (with 1000 resamples) was used to create 95% bias-corrected confidence intervals to estimate direct and indirect effects.

A fully saturated mediated model was initially tested. This model did not show an acceptable fit with the data, χ2 (11, 530) = 1051.52, p < 0.001; CFI = 0.43; SRMR = 0.18; RMSEA = 0.42. Model modification indices suggested the addition of two paths, which are supported by current theory and/or past literature: (1) internal shame is a robust predictor of psychological distress [9, 13, 58], and (2) internal shame is also closely associated with body shame [29, 57]. The addition of a path from internal shame to psychological distress significantly improved model fit, ΔΧ2 (1) = 285.08, p < 0.001, as did the addition of a path from internal shame to body shame, ΔΧ2 (1) = 201.78, p < 0.001. The addition of these two paths led to overall acceptable model fit, Χ2 (8, 530) = 22.71, p = 0.004; CFI = 0.99; SRMR = 0.02; RMSEA = 0.06. Fitting direct paths from the five types of childhood maltreatment to binge eating symptoms did not significantly improve model fit, indicating that the relationships between childhood maltreatment experiences and binge eating symptoms were fully mediated. In partial support of hypothesis 1, internal shame and psychological distress serially mediated the relationship between childhood emotional maltreatment but and binge eating symptoms. Hypothesis 2 was also partially supported the relationship between some forms of child maltreatment (physical abuse, physical neglect) and binge eating symptoms was mediated by psychological distress but was not mediated by external shame. To test our third hypothesis, a path was fitted from body shame to psychological distress, however this path was not significant (p = 0.78) so it was removed from the model.

Non-significant regression coefficients were then trimmed from the model, including the removal of a direct path from internal shame to binge eating symptoms. As there were no significant direct or indirect regression paths leading from external shame to binge eating symptoms, this variable was removed from the model. Finally, based on sample BMI (more than two thirds BMI > 25) we tested a feedback loop whereby binge eating might lead to increased overvaluation of body shape and weight due to increased weight [34], and then to an increase in internal shame, body shame, and psychological distress [57]. The variable, overvaluation of shape and weight, and these four feedback paths were added to the model. Several significant paths were found and retained, including from binge eating to overvaluation of shape and weight, as well as from overvaluation of shape and weight to internal shame and body shame. The final model (Fig. 1) showed excellent fit, χ2 (22, 530) = 46.93, p = 0.002; CFI = 0.98 SRMR = 0.05; RMSEA = 0.04. This model accounted for 18%, 29%, 45%, 48%, and 27% of the variance in overvaluation of shape and weight, internal shame, body shame, psychological distress, and binge eating, respectively.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Final path model (N = 530).Note. Results are standardised path coefficients. Values in brackets are 95% confidence intervals. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, **p < 0.001

Full size image

Due to the significant proportion of participants with a probable diagnosis of BN, the final model was run again, stratified by eating disorder subsample (BED n = 363; BN n = 167). The final model was an excellent fit for the BED subsample, χ2 (23, 363) = 32.94, p = 0.082; CFI = 1.00 SRMR = 0.06; RMSEA = 0.04, and a good fit for the BN subsample, χ2 (23, 167) = 34.98, p = 0.052; CFI = 0.97, SRMR = 0.05; RMSEA = 0.06, indicating that the inclusion of the BN subsample did not significantly skew model fit. For parsimony, the final model was rerun, combining CEA with CEN into a total score to form an emotional maltreatment variable, and combining CPA and CPN into a total score to form a physical maltreatment variable. This model (Fig. 2) showed an excellent fit for the data, χ2 (11, 530) = 17.82, p = 0.09; CFI = 0.99, SRMR = 0.03; RMSEA = 0.03.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Final path model combining types of emotional and physical maltreatment (N = 530). Note. Results are standardised path coefficients. Values in brackets are 95% confidence intervals. *p < 0.05. ***p < 0.001)

Full size image

Discussion

This study was the first of its kind to examine whether internal shame, external shame, body shame, and psychological distress independently or serially mediate relationships between different forms of childhood maltreatment and binge eating symptoms among adults. Our first hypothesis was partially supported: the relationships from childhood emotional maltreatment but not CSA to binge eating symptoms were serially mediated by internal shame and psychological distress. Our second hypothesis was partially supported: relationships between some childhood maltreatment and binge eating symptoms were mediated by psychological distress but were not mediated by external shame. Our third hypothesis was also partially supported; the relationship between CSA and binge eating symptoms was mediated by body shame but not psychological distress. Our results also suggested that the relationship between childhood physical maltreatment and binge eating is mediated by psychological distress. Finally, the feedback loop we tested showed that binge eating led to increased overvaluation of shape and weight, contributing to further increased internal shame and body shame.

Despite past research linking external shame to childhood maltreatment and binge eating [45, 57], our results showed that external shame did not mediate the childhood maltreatment-binge eating relationship for any of the five forms of childhood maltreatment examined in the study. Notably, internal shame and external shame were highly correlated, and childhood maltreatment and binge eating were more highly correlated with internal shame than external shame. Therefore, it is possible that there was no unique contribution of external shame to the model after accounting for internal shame [14]. Previous studies which found that external shame made a significant contribution to binge eating did not examine internal shame in their models [18, 20], providing support for this explanation. Additionally, our result was consistent with previous research examining internal shame and external shame together [47], whereby the link between internal shame and binge eating was significantly stronger than that between external shame and binge eating.

Childhood emotional maltreatment

Internal shame and psychological distress serially mediated the relationship between childhood emotional maltreatment (CEA, CEN) and binge eating. This finding is consistent with past childhood trauma literature which shows that childhood emotional maltreatment is a stronger predictor of adult depressive symptoms than other forms of maltreatment [43], and more recent research indicating that both CEA and CEN are linked to depressive symptoms via internal shame [61, 66]. Our results suggest that experiences of emotional maltreatment may be internalised, developing into longstanding beliefs about one’s inadequacy or worthlessness, which feeds psychological distress. Childhood emotional maltreatment is also a robust predictor of poor emotion regulation in adulthood [8]. Therefore, it is possible that the contribution of childhood emotional maltreatment to increased psychological distress, alongside poor emotion regulation skills, leads to the use of binge eating as a dysfunctional strategy to regulate distress [39].

Internal shame was found to contribute to body shame. This finding is consistent with previous research linking these forms of shame [46]. Internal shame might become associated with one’s body, in part due to the overvaluation of weight and shape in western and westernised cultures [35, 70]. Binge eating may then be used as a maladaptive strategy to experience temporary relief or attentional redirection from the experience of body shame [18].

Childhood sexual abuse

The relationship found between CSA and binge eating is well supported by past literature [33]. However, to our knowledge, the present study is the first to identify body shame as a factor that fully mediates this relationship. Literature linking CSA to eating disorder pathology shows that there are stronger associations between CSA and bulimic pathology compared to restrictive eating behaviours [50]. It is theorised that binge-purge behaviour might serve as a way to regulate distress, to express anger, or as a physical manifestation of “cleansing” the body [62]. Our results add to this literature, indicating that non-compensatory binge eating may be used to alleviate body shame. Previous research shows that individuals who experience CSA may develop feelings of disgust or shame towards their own bodies [3]. It is possible that binge eating may be then used to modify one’s body to acquire and maintain a less attractive appearance and avoid future abuse, e.g., via weight gain [36], or to regulate body-related distress [20].

Childhood physical maltreatment

Childhood physical maltreatment (CPA, CPN) was linked to binge eating via psychological distress. The association between childhood physical maltreatment and the development of adulthood depression and anxiety is well-established [40]. It is theorised that childhood physical maltreatment is a non-specific risk factor for psychopathology broadly in adulthood via a range of mediating mechanisms including low self-esteem [4] and insecure attachment [72]. Our results suggest that psychological distress also mediated this relationship, and that binge eating may be used to alleviate this distress.

Overvaluation of shape and weight

Overvaluation of shape and weight mediated a feedback loop from binge eating to both internal shame and body shame. These findings were consistent with past research [34, 57], and suggest that the physical and psychological sequalae of binge eating (i.e., weight gain and increased overvaluation) further strengthen the shame-binge eating relationship. This finding highlights the central role of shame in perpetuating binge eating symptoms, and so the potential benefits in shame-focussed psychological treatment in BED.

Limitations and future directions

This study has several limitations which must be considered in evaluating our results and conclusions. Considering that the data is cross-sectional, we are unable to infer causality among the variables. For instance, longitudinal research is required to test our hypothesis that body shame stemming from CSA may be reduced via binge eating. Our sample was non-clinical, and limited in diversity, with most participants being female, white, well-educated, and from a western country, therefore it is unclear whether our results generalise to the wider BED population. Accordingly, future research should attempt to replicate current findings using a clinical, representative sample. Another possible limitation was our use of dichotomous variables in our assessment of childhood maltreatment. While this measure shows strong concurrent validity with longer form measures of childhood trauma [54, 65], we were not able to examine severity levels of each type of childhood maltreatment which may have affected results.

Conclusion and clinical implications

Our findings underscore the importance of screening for and treating the psychological effects of childhood maltreatment in BED presentations. Our results also highlight the importance of considering how the long-term consequences of childhood maltreatment may play an ongoing role in binge eating symptoms in adulthood, via increased internal shame, body shame, and/or psychological distress. Clinicians should screen for childhood maltreatment when treating individuals with BED. In presentations where childhood maltreatment experiences are reported, clinicians should also assess for and treat symptoms of internal shame, body shame, and psychological distress which may maintain binge eating. For individuals with high levels of internal shame and body shame, targeted interventions such as compassion focussed therapy for eating disorders (CFT-E) [31] should be considered. For those experiencing shame that is closely intertwined with specific childhood memories of abuse, interventions that target those shame memories such as eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy may be indicated [67]. Gold standard treatments for BED such as enhanced cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT-E) [32] might also be adapted for shame-prone individuals with BED. For instance, targeting shame cognitions may be beneficial when using this treatment. Furthermore, for individuals with a history of CSA who experience body shame, a focus on treating body shame rather than body dissatisfaction may lead to more success in reducing binge eating. Future treatment development research for individuals with BED and a childhood maltreatment history could examine the efficacy of interventions such as CFT-E [31] that treat internal shame and body shame.

Availability of data and materials

The data that supports findings of this study are available, upon reasonable request, from Elyse O’Loghlen [elyseologhlen@swin.edu.au], for the duration of her employment at Swinburne University of Technology.

Change history

References

  1. Allison KC, Grilo CM, Masheb RM, Stunkard AJ. High self-reported rates of neglect and emotional abuse, by persons with binge eating disorder and night eating syndrome. Behav Res Ther. 2007;45(12):2874–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2007.05.007.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Washington: American Psychiatric Association; 2013. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Andrews B. Body shame and abuse in childhood. In: Gilbert P, Miles J, editors. Body shame. London: Routledge; 2014. p. 270–80.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Arslan G. Psychological maltreatment, emotional and behavioral problems in adolescents: the mediating role of resilience and self-esteem. Child Abuse Negl. 2016;52:200–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Becker DF, Grilo CM. Childhood maltreatment in women with binge-eating disorder: associations with psychiatric comorbidity, psychological functioning, and eating pathology. Eat Weight Disord Stud Anorex Bulim Obes. 2011;16(2):e113–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03325316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bödicker C, Reinckens J, Höfler M, Hoyer J. Is childhood maltreatment associated with body image disturbances in adulthood? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Child Adolesc Trauma. 2021;15:1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociol Methods Res. 1992;21(2):230–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Burns EE, Fischer S, Jackson JL, Harding HG. Deficits in emotion regulation mediate the relationship between childhood abuse and later eating disorder symptoms. Child Abuse Negl. 2012;36(1):32–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cândea D-M, Szentagotai-Tătar A. Shame-proneness, guilt-proneness and anxiety symptoms: a meta-analysis. J Anxiety Disord. 2018;58:78–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Caslini M, Bartoli F, Crocamo C, Dakanalis A, Clerici M, Carrà G. Disentangling the association between child abuse and eating disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychosom Med. 2016;78(1):79–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Celio AA, Wilfley DE, Crow SJ, Mitchell J, Walsh BT. A comparison of the binge eating scale, questionnaire for eating and weight patterns-revised, and eating disorder examination questionnaire with instructions with the eating disorder examination in the assessment of binge eating disorder and its symptoms. Int J Eat Disord. 2004;36(4):434–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cook DR. Measuring shame: the internalized shame scale. Alcohol Treat Q. 1988;4(2):197–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cunha M, Matos M, Faria D, Zagalo S. Shame memories and psychopathology in adolescence: the mediator effect of shame. Int J Psychol Psychol Ther. 2012;12(2):203–18.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Daoud JI. Multicollinearity and regression analysis. J Phys Conf Ser. 2017;949:012009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Deblinger E, Runyon MK. Understanding and treating feelings of shame in children who have experienced maltreatment. Child Maltreat. 2005;10(4):364–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Del Rosario PM, White RM. The internalized shame scale: temporal stability, internal consistency, and principal components analysis. Personal Individ differ. 2006;41(1):95–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Drapeau A, Marchand A, Beaulieu-Prevost D. Epidemiology of psychological distress. In: LAbate PL, editor. Mental illnesses: understanding prediction and control. Rijeka: IntechOpen; 2012. https://doi.org/10.5772/30872.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Duarte C, Pinto-Gouveia J. The impact of early shame memories in binge eating disorder: the mediator effect of current body image shame and cognitive fusion. Psychiatry Res. 2017;258:511–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.08.086.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Duarte C, Pinto-Gouveia J, Ferreira C. Expanding binge eating assessment: validity and screening value of the binge eating scale in women from the general population. Eat Behav. 2015;18:41–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Duarte C, Pinto-Gouveia J, Ferreira C. Ashamed and fused with body image and eating: binge eating as an avoidance strategy. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2017;24(1):195–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Duarte C, Pinto-Gouveia J, Ferreira C, Batista D. Body image as a source of shame: a new measure for the assessment of the multifaceted nature of body image shame. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2015;22(6):656–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dube SR, Felitti VJ, Dong M, Chapman DP, Giles WH, Anda RF. Childhood abuse, neglect, and household dysfunction and the risk of illicit drug use: the adverse childhood experiences study. Pediatrics. 2003;111(3):564–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fairburn CG, Belgin SJ. Eating disorder examination questionnaire. In: Fairburn CG, editor. Cognitive behavior therapy and eating disorders. New York: Guilford Press; 2008. p. 309–14.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Feinson M, Hornik-Lurie T. Binge eating and childhood emotional abuse: the mediating role of anger. Appetite. 2016;105:487–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Feinson M, Hornik-Lurie T. “Not good enough:” exploring self-criticism’s role as a mediator between childhood emotional abuse and adult binge eating. Eat Behav. 2016;23:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2016.06.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Felitti VJ, Anda RF, Nordenberg D, Williamson DF, Spitz AM, Edwards V, Marks JS. Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: the adverse childhood experiences (ACE) Study. Am J Prev Med. 1998;14(4):245–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ferreira C, Moura-Ramos M, Matos M, Galhardo A. A new measure to assess external and internal shame: development, factor structure and psychometric properties of the external and internal shame scale. Curr Psychol. 2020;41:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Freitas SR, Lopes CS, Appolinario JC, Coutinho W. The assessment of binge eating disorder in obese women: a comparison of the binge eating scale with the structured clinical interview for the DSM-IV. Eat Behav. 2006;7(3):282–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gilbert P. Body shame: a biopsychosocial conceptualisation and overview with treatment implications. In: Gilbert P, Miles J, editors. Body shame. London: Routledge; 2014. p. 17–68.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Gormally J, Black S, Daston S, Rardin D. The assessment of binge eating severity among obese persons. Addict Behav. 1982;7(1):47–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Goss K, Allan S. Compassion focused therapy for eating disorders. Int J Cogn Ther. 2010;3(2):141–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Grilo CM. Psychological and behavioral treatments for binge-eating disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2017;78(suppl 1):16087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Grilo CM, Masheb RM. Childhood psychological, physical, and sexual maltreatment in outpatients with binge eating disorder: frequency and associations with gender, obesity, and eating-related psychopathology. Obes Res. 2001;9(5):320–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2001.40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Grilo CM, Masheb RM, Crosby RD. Predictors and moderators of response to cognitive behavioral therapy and medication for the treatment of binge eating disorder. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2012;80(5):897.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Grogan S. Body image: understanding body dissatisfaction in men, women, and children. London: Routledge; 2021. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003100041.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. Gustafson TB, Gibbons LM, Sarwer DB, Crerand CE, Fabricatore AN, Wadden TA, Raper SE, Williams NN. History of sexual abuse among bariatric surgery candidates. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2006;2(3):369–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J. 1999;6(1):1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Jaffee SR. Child maltreatment and risk for psychopathology in childhood and adulthood. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2017;13:525–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kenny TE, Singleton C, Carter JC. Testing predictions of the emotion regulation model of binge-eating disorder. Int J Eat Disord. 2017;50(11):1297–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lindert J, von Ehrenstein OS, Grashow R, Gal G, Braehler E, Weisskopf MG. Sexual and physical abuse in childhood is associated with depression and anxiety over the life course: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Public Health. 2014;59(2):359–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) with the beck depression and anxiety inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995;33(3):335–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Luce KH, Crowther JH, Pole M. Eating disorder examination questionnaire (EDE-Q): norms for undergraduate women. Int J Eat Disord. 2008;41(3):273–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Mandelli L, Petrelli C, Serretti A. The role of specific early trauma in adult depression: a meta-analysis of published literature. Childhood trauma and adult depression. Eur Psychiatry. 2015;30(6):665–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Matos M, Pinto-Gouveia J, Gilbert P, Duarte C, Figueiredo C. The other as shamer scale–2: development and validation of a short version of a measure of external shame. Personal Individ differ. 2015;74:6–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Matos M, Pinto-Gouveia J. Shame as a traumatic memory. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2010;17(4):299–312.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Melo D, Oliveira S, Ferreira C. The link between external and internal shame and binge eating: the mediating role of body image-related shame and cognitive fusion. Eat Weight Disord. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-019-00811-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Melo D, Oliveira S, Ferreira C. The link between external and internal shame and binge eating: the mediating role of body image-related shame and cognitive fusion. Eat Weight Disord Stud Anorex Bulim Obes. 2020;25:1703–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Milligan RJ, Andrews B. Suicidal and other self-harming behaviour in offender women: the role of shame, anger and childhood abuse. Leg Criminol Psychol. 2005;10(1):13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Minnich AM, Gordon KH, Kwan MY, Troop-Gordon W. Examining the mediating role of alexithymia in the association between childhood neglect and disordered eating behaviors in men and women. Psychol Men Masc. 2017;18(4):414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Molendijk M, Hoek H, Brewerton TD, Elzinga B. Childhood maltreatment and eating disorder pathology: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2017;47(8):1402–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Mond JM, Hay PJ, Rodgers B, Owen C. An update on the definition of “excessive exercise” in eating disorders research. Int J Eat Disord. 2006;39(2):147–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Mond JM, Hay PJ, Rodgers B, Owen C, Beumont P. Validity of the eating disorder examination questionnaire (EDE-Q) in screening for eating disorders in community samples. Behav Res Ther. 2004;42(5):551–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Munsch S, Meyer AH, Quartier V, Wilhelm FH. Binge eating in binge eating disorder: A breakdown of emotion regulatory process? Psychiatry Res. 2012;195(3):118–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Murphy A, Steele M, Dube SR, Bate J, Bonuck K, Meissner P, Goldman H, Steele H. Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) questionnaire and adult attachment interview (AAI): implications for parent child relationships. Child Abuse Negl. 2014;38(2):224–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Nicholls W, Devonport T, Blake M. The association between emotions and eating behaviour in an obese population with binge eating disorder. Obes Rev. 2016;17(1):30–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Norton PJ. Depression anxiety and stress scales (DASS-21): psychometric analysis across four racial groups. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2007;20(3):253–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. O’Loghlen E, Grant S, Galligan R. Shame and binge eating pathology: a systematic review. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2022;29(1):147–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Pinto-Gouveia J, Matos M. Can shame memories become a key to identity? The centrality of shame memories predicts psychopathology. Appl Cogn Psychol. 2011;25(2):281–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Rabito-Alcón MF, Baile JI, Vanderlinden J. Mediating factors between childhood traumatic experiences and eating disorders development: a systematic review. Children. 2021;8(2):114.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Reisner SL, Hughto JM. Comparing the health of non-binary and binary transgender adults in a statewide non-probability sample. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(8):e0221583.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Ross ND, Kaminski PL, Herrington R. From childhood emotional maltreatment to depressive symptoms in adulthood: the roles of self-compassion and shame. Child Abuse Negl. 2019;92:32–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Sanci L, Coffey C, Olsson C, Reid S, Carlin JB, Patton G. Childhood sexual abuse and eating disorders in females: findings from the Victorian adolescent health cohort study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008;162(3):261–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Scheer JR, Harney P, Esposito J, Woulfe JM. Self-reported mental and physical health symptoms and potentially traumatic events among lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer individuals: the role of shame. Psychol Violence. 2020;10(2):131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Scheff TJ. Shame in self and society. Symb Interact. 2003;26(2):239–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Schmidt MR, Narayan AJ, Atzl VM, Rivera LM, Lieberman AF. Childhood maltreatment on the adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) scale versus the childhood trauma questionnaire (CTQ) in a perinatal sample. J Aggress Maltreat Trauma. 2020;29(1):38–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Shahar B, Doron G, Szepsenwol O. Childhood maltreatment, shame-proneness and self-criticism in social anxiety disorder: a sequential mediational model. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2015;22(6):570–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Shapiro F. The role of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy in medicine: addressing the psychological and physical symptoms stemming from adverse life experiences. Perm J. 2014;18(1):71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Stice E, Gau JM, Rohde P, Shaw H. Risk factors that predict future onset of each DSM–5 eating disorder: predictive specificity in high-risk adolescent females. J Abnorm Psychol. 2017;126(1):38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Talmon A, Ginzburg K. “Body self” in the shadow of childhood sexual abuse: the long-term implications of sexual abuse for male and female adult survivors. Child Abuse Negl. 2018;76:416–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Wertheim EH, Paxton SJ. Body image development in adolescent girls. 2011.

  71. Whiffen VE, MacIntosh HB. Mediators of the link between childhood sexual abuse and emotional distress: a critical review. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2005;6(1):24–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Widom CS, Czaja SJ, Kozakowski SS, Chauhan P. Does adult attachment style mediate the relationship between childhood maltreatment and mental and physical health outcomes? Child Abuse Negl. 2018;76:533–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. World Health Organization. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic: report of a WHO consultation on obesity. Geneva: WHO; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Yaghoubi S, Birashk B, Aghebati A, Ashouri A. Mediating role of external shame and self-compassion in the relationship between peer victimization and depression in adolescents. Iran J Psychiatry Clin Psychol. 2021;27(1):16–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors declare that there are no acknowledgements

Funding

This work was supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship. The article has received sponsorship from Takeda Pharmaceutical Australia to cover the Article Processing Charge.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia

    Elyse O’Loghlen, Roslyn Galligan & Sharon Grant

Authors
  1. Elyse O’Loghlen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Roslyn Galligan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sharon Grant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

EO: Conceptualisation; methodology; formal analysis; investigation; resources; writing—original draft. RG: Conceptualisation; writing—review and editing; supervision. SG: Conceptualisation; Writing—review and editing; supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elyse O’Loghlen.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

All study procedures were approved by an institutional Human Research Ethics Committee (project 20215477-8486). Informed consent to participate in this study was obtained prior to beginning of the online survey.

Consent for publication

Consent for participants’ deidentified data to be published was obtained prior to the beginning of the online survey.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original version of this article was revised: The sponsorship from Takeda Pharmaceutical Australia to cover the Article Processing Charge has been added in the Funding section

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

O’Loghlen, E., Galligan, R. & Grant, S. Childhood maltreatment, shame, psychological distress, and binge eating: testing a serial mediational model. J Eat Disord 11, 96 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-023-00819-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-023-00819-7

Keywords

Journal of Eating Disorders

ISSN: 2050-2974