Skip to main content

Association between binge eating and physical violence perpetration among U.S. college students

Abstract

Background

To date, no known research has explored the link between binge eating and physical violence perpetration despite overlapping psychological constructs that underpin these behaviors (i.e., emotion regulation difficulties, impulsivity). Therefore, this study aimed to determine the association between binge eating and self-reported physical violence perpetration.

Methods

Cross-sectional data from four survey years (2016–2020) of the national (U.S.) Healthy Minds Study (N = 6210) were analyzed. Unadjusted (Independent samples t test) and adjusted (logistic regression) analyses were conducted to determine the associations between binge eating in the past four weeks and violence perpetration in the past 12 months, while adjusting for potential confounders.

Results

The unadjusted mean number of days of binge eating was significantly higher among participants who reported physical violence perpetration (M = 2.6, SD = 5.2) compared to those who did not (M = 1.8, SD = 3.7). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that each additional day of binge eating was associated with 5% higher odds (95% confidence interval 1.02–1.09) of self-reported physical violence perpetration, while adjusting for potential confounders.

Conclusions

Results from this study are the first known to identify an association between binge eating and physical violence perpetration among U.S. college students. Findings are supported by the potential mechanistic overlap of emotion regulation and impulsivity associated with both binge eating and violence perpetration, underscoring the need for more research.

Plain English summary

Both binge eating and physical violence perpetration are independently associated with impulsivity and emotion regulation difficulties, yet no known research has explored the link between these two behaviors. Findings from this study show that greater engagement in binge eating is associated with physical violence perpetration among U.S. college students, a particularly high-risk group for both eating disorder and physical violence involvement. These findings underscore the need for more research to understand the mechanisms that explain the link between these behaviors, as well as emphasize the need for prevention efforts on college campuses.

Background

Adolescence and young adulthood (i.e., the college years) are particularly salient developmental phases when the codification of health and coping behaviors solidify [1, 2]. College students, in particular, are at elevated risk for mental health and interpersonal problems [3, 4]. Specifically, eating disorders are highly prevalent on college campuses, with upwards of 12% of college students at elevated risk for an eating disorder [5]. Disordered eating behaviors are also highly prevalent, with binge eating (40%) being more common than compensatory behaviors (e.g., purging behaviors; 30%) [5]. Binge eating episodes are characterized by consuming large amounts of food in relatively short time periods, lacking control over what and how much food is eaten, and often includes eating very quickly, eating regardless of hunger cues, and feelings of self-disgust, guilt, and depression [6]. The high risk of eating disorders and disordered eating behaviors is likely due to the increase in body dissatisfaction from early adolescence to young adulthood, with individuals reporting the highest body dissatisfaction during young adulthood [7]. The high occurrence of eating disorders and disordered eating behaviors is problematic given many associated adverse health and social effects [8,9,10,11,12].

Violence on college campuses is also relatively common. Among college students, 20% report dating violence victimization, including emotional, physical, and sexual violence, as well as stalking [13]. Relatedly, recent research has shown that nearly 5% of college students reported perpetrating violence in the past 12-months, with a significant increase over the last five years [14]. Violence involvement, including violence perpetration, like eating disorders and disordered eating behaviors, are associated with adverse outcomes [13, 15, 16]. Despite recent research documenting the association between physical violence perpetration and elevated eating disorder risk among college students [14], there is little knowledge of the specific eating disorder behaviors (e.g., binge eating) that are associated with physical violence perpetration. It is important to understand whether these forms of risk behaviors are connected to ensure proper assessment and intervention from on- and off-campus health professionals, public health professionals, as well as professionals within the justice system (i.e., police officers).

Contextualized by the adolescent and young adult developmental phase, research has documented the clustering of health risk behaviors, including disordered eating behaviors, violence, and substance use among young people [17,18,19]. The clustering of these behaviors may be explained by several factors. First, emotion dysregulation and the personality trait of impulsivity may be common factors that underlie these health risk behaviors [20, 21]. From this perspective, one may engage in disordered eating behaviors, violence, and/or substance use as mechanisms to manage unwanted negative emotions (i.e., maladaptive coping skills) [22]. Relatedly, adolescents and young adults may engage in these behaviors impulsively given neurological immaturity [23, 24], without thinking through potential consequences. Specifically, emotion regulation difficulty and impulsivity are common attributes of individuals with eating disorders, and it has been suggested that intense emotional states precede binge eating episodes. Thus, individuals likely engage in binge eating episodes in a maladaptive attempt to regulate negative emotions [25, 26]. Similar to binge eating, there is a strong correlation between aggression, the inability to regulate emotion, and impulsive behavior, with violence being understood as the inappropriate processing or expression of unpleasant emotions, and impulsivity as a high-risk factor for such conduct [27, 28].

Second, problem behavior theory posits that engagement in one problem behavior increases the likelihood of engagement in other problem behaviors [29, 30]. Through this theoretical lens, it may be that the clustering of health risk behaviors (i.e., binge eating and violence perpetration in this case), may occur given the unique risk and protective factors of the individual and the interaction between these individuals and the environment [29, 30]. This theory may also explain the high prevalence of substance use, including alcohol use and illicit drug use, among college students [31,32,33,34]. In fact, substance use may lead to further health risk behaviors (e.g., mental health problems, violence) [35]. Additionally, alcohol use and illicit drug use often coincide with engagement in, or are catalysts of, binge eating and violence perpetration [36,37,38,39,40,41].

This study aimed to test the hypothesis that binge eating and violence perpetration are associated given the clustering of health risk and problematic behaviors, as well as the underlying mechanisms of emotion regulation and impulsivity. Findings may guide future research on the clustering of problem behaviors among college students, as well as have implications for an interdisciplinary group of professionals.

Methods

We analyzed pooled data from four survey years (2016–2017, 2017–2018, 2018–2019, 2019–2020) of the national (U.S.) Healthy Minds Study (HMS). HMS is an annual cross-sectional survey of the social and physical health and well-being of college students. Colleges and universities voluntarily elect to participate in HMS. At institutions with ≥ 4000 students, 4000 students were randomly invited to participate in the survey; at institutions with < 4000 students, all students were invited. To be eligible to participate, students must have been at least 18 years old and provided informed consent. Students were invited to participate via email and the survey was administered online via Qualtrics. Students were incentivized to participate using a prize drawing of Amazon gift cards. HMS was approved by the Health Sciences and Behavioral Sciences Institutional Review Board at the University of Michigan and all participating institutions.

Measures

Physical violence perpetration was measured using the question: “Over the past 12 months, did you strike or physically injure anyone?” A dichotomous “yes” or “no” response was available. This measure has been used in prior research [14]. Binge eating was measured using the question, “Over the past 4 weeks (28 days), on how many days have you eaten an unusually large amount of food and have had a sense of loss of control at the time?” Response options ranged from zero (0) to 28 days. This measure is part of the widely used Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire [42].

Statistical analysis

HMS utilizes a module-based survey design, which limits the number of participants who received the binge eating measure each survey year. We excluded participants who did not respond to the binge eating and violence perpetration measures. This resulted in a sample of 6210 participants. We tested and found that the data was consistent with missing completely at random (Little’s MCAR test p > 0.05). Descriptive analyses were conducted to describe the sample characteristics. Unadjusted mean (M) number of days and standard deviations (SD) of binge eating in the past four weeks by self-reported physical violence perpetration in the past 12-months was estimated using Independent samples t test. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to estimate the association between number of days of binge eating in the past four weeks (independent variable) and self-reported physical violence perpetration in the past 12-months (dependent variable), while adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, body mass index (BMI; kg/m2), highest parental education, any illicit drug use (i.e., marijuana, cocaine, opioids, MDMA, etc.) in the past 30 days, and any alcohol use in the past two weeks. These variables were controlled for given prior research on related to binge-eating and violence perpetration [14, 36,37,38,39,40,41]. All analyses included preconstructed sample weighting to mitigate nonresponse bias and were conducted in 2021 using Stata 16.1.

Results

Among the diverse sample of 6,210 college student participants, the mean number of days of binge eating in the past four weeks was 1.8 (SD = 3.7) and 3.5% reported physical violence perpetration in the past 12-months (Table 1). The unadjusted mean number of days of binge eating was higher among participants who reported physical violence perpetration in the past 12-months (M = 2.6, SD = 5.2, p < 0.001; Fig. 1) compared to those who did not (M = 1.8, SD = 3.7). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that each additional day of binge eating in the past four weeks was associated with 5% higher odds of self-reported physical violence perpetration in the past 12-months (95% confidence interval 1.02–1.09, p = 0.001), while adjusting for potential confounders. In a posthoc analysis, we found no evidence of effect modification by gender on the association between binge eating and physical violence perpetration.

Table 1 Demographic and sample characteristics of participants from the 2016–2020 Healthy Minds Study (N = 6210)
Fig. 1
figure 1

Unadjusted mean days of binge eating in the past four weeks by self-reported physical violence perpetration in the past 12-months among participants in the 2016–2020 Healthy Minds Study (N = 6210). Mean days of binge eating was significantly higher (p < 0.001) among those who reported physical violence perpetration.

Discussion

This study aimed to determine the association between binge eating and physical violence perpetration among a national sample of college student participants. Results showed significant associations in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses. Among over 6200 college student participants, the average number of days of binge eating at the time of the study was higher among participants who reported physical violence perpetration, and each additional day of binge eating was associated with 5% higher odds of physical violence perpetration. This finding aligns with and expands prior research showing a significant association between elevated eating disorder risk and physical violence perpetration among college students [14], as well as eating disorders and aggressive and impulsive behaviors [43, 44].

Contextualized by the clustering of health risk and problem behaviors, the association between binge eating and physical violence perpetration may be explained by the overlapping psychological constructs of difficulty with emotion regulation and impulse control [25,26,27,28]. Importantly, in the adjusted analysis, the association between binge eating and physical violence perpetration was independent of any alcohol use and any illicit drug use. This is important considering that substance use can also coincide with disordered eating behaviors and violence involvement [17,18,19].

The findings from this study have important implications for future research, as well as an interdisciplinary group of professionals. Future research is needed to determine the prospective relationship between binge eating and physical violence perpetration and empirically identify the mechanisms underlying these behaviors. This may include the use of a prospective cohort study to assess the relationship between binge eating and physical violence perpetration over time, as well as qualitative analyses that investigate the lived experiences of young people who engage in both binge eating and physical violence perpetration. The use of specific emotion regulation (e.g., Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale) [45] and impulsivity (e.g., Barratt Impulsiveness Scale) [46] measures should also be included in future research to assess whether these constructs empirically mediate the relationship between binge eating and physical violence perpetration. Healthcare professionals should understand that health risks and problem behaviors may cluster together, and consider screening for both binge eating and physical violence perpetration when one or both are present. Utilizing targeted interventions aimed at increasing emotion regulation and impulse control capabilities with clients may be warranted to prevent or reduce both binge eating and physical violence perpetration [47]. Additionally, public health programs and institutions of higher education should consider the overlapping nature of mental health problems and interpersonal violence to inform and tailor student health and mental health supports (e.g., information regarding healthy living behaviors and coping, support for eating disorders) and violence prevention efforts (e.g., de-escalation techniques, education on healthy relationships). Finally, it may be particularly important to provide campus police sufficient education and training on the overlap between mental health problems (i.e., eating disorder behaviors such as binge eating) and violence among college students. This may generate new avenues for assessment and treatment of eating disorders and violence.

There are several strengths and limitations of this study to note. Strengths of this study include the use of a large, diverse, and national sample of college students. Limitations include the cross-sectional survey design, which limits causal inference; however, this study did not specifically aim to identify the directionality between binge eating and violence perpetration, as it is likely that the relationship is bidirectional given the clustering of health risk and problem behaviors. Additionally, the measures are based on self-report, which may increase social desirability bias, and there is the potential for unmeasured confounders that may influence the relationship.

Conclusion

The results from this study show that binge eating and physical violence perpetration are associated within a national sample of college student participants. This association may be explained by the clustering of health risk and problem behaviors, as well as the psychological constructs of emotion regulation and impulse control difficulty common among individuals who engage in these behaviors. Future research is needed to empirically identify these underlying mechanisms.

Availability of data and materials

The Healthy Minds Study is available to researchers. Visit https://healthymindsnetwork.org/ for more information.

References

  1. Reifman A, Arnett JJ, Colwell MJ. Emerging adulthood: theory, assessment and application. J Youth Dev. 2007;2:37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arnett JJ. Emerging adulthood: a theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. Am Psychol. 2000;55:469–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Halladay J, Freibott CE, Lipson SK, Zhou S, Eisenberg D. Trends in the co-occurrence of substance use and mental health symptomatology in a national sample of US post-secondary students from 2009 to 2019. J Am Coll Health. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2022.2098030.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Moskow DM, Lipson SK, Tompson MC. Anxiety and suicidality in the college student population. J Am Coll Health. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2022.2060042.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lipson SK, Sonneville KR. Eating disorder symptoms among undergraduate and graduate students at 12 U.S. colleges and universities. Eat Behav. 2017;24:81–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2016.12.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Arlington: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Bucchianeri MM, Arikian AJ, Hannan PJ, Eisenberg ME, Neumark-Sztainer D. Body dissatisfaction from adolescence to young adulthood: findings from a 10-year longitudinal study. Body Image. 2013;10:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2012.09.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lipson SK, Sonneville KR. Understanding suicide risk and eating disorders in college student populations: results from a National Study. Int J Eat Disord. 2020;53:229–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.23188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Udo T, Grilo CM. Psychiatric and medical correlates of DSM-5 eating disorders in a nationally representative sample of adults in the United States. Int J Eat Disord. 2019;52:42–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ganson KT, Cuccolo K, Nagata JM. Associations between psychosis symptoms and eating disorders among a national sample of U.S. college students. Eat Behav. 2022;45:101622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2022.101622.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. O’Brien KM, Whelan DR, Sandler DP, Hall JE, Weinberg CR. Predictors and long-term health outcomes of eating disorders. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tabler J, Utz RL. The influence of adolescent eating disorders or disordered eating behaviors on socioeconomic achievement in early adulthood. Int J Eat Disord. 2015;48:622–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Brewer N, Thomas KA, Higdon J. Intimate partner violence, health, sexuality, and academic performance among a national sample of undergraduates. J Am Coll Health. 2018;66:683–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2018.1454929.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ganson KT, O’Connor J, Nagata JM. Physical violence perpetration among college students: prevalence and associations with substance use and mental health symptoms. J Interpers Violence. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260521991888.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Amanor-Boadu Y, Stith SM, Strachman Miller M, Cook J, Allen L, Gorzek MVO-2 (2011) Impact of dating violence on male and female college students. Partn Abus 2:323–343

  16. Foshee VA, Gottfredson NC, Reyes HLMN, Chen MS, David-Ferdon C, Latzman NE, et al. Developmental outcomes of using physical violence against dates and peers. J Adolesc Health. 2016;58:665–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.03.002.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Fergus KB, Copp HL, Tabler JL, Nagata JM. Eating disorders and disordered eating behaviors among women: associations with sexual risk. Int J Eat Disord. 2019;52:1310–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fox HB, McManus MA, Arnold KN. Significant multiple risk behaviors among US high school students. In: The national Alliance to advance adolescent health. Fact sheet no-8. 2010;1–10. http://www.thenationalalliance.org/pdfs/FS8. Significant Multiple Risk Behaviors.pdf

  19. Orpinas PK, Basen-Engquist K, Grunbaum JA, Parcel GS. The co-morbidity of violence-related behaviors with health-risk behaviors in a population of high school students. J Adolesc Health. 1995;16:216–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bakhshani N-M. Impulsivity: a predisposition toward risky behaviors. Int J High Risk Behav Addict. 2014;3:2–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Weiss NH, Tull MT, Davis LT, Searcy J, Williams I, Gratz KL. A preliminary experimental investigation of emotion dysregulation and impulsivity in risky behaviours. Behav Change. 2015;32:127–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Aldao A, Nolen-Hoeksema S, Schweizer S. Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: a meta-analytic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010;30:217–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Viner RM, Ozer EM, Denny S, Marmot M, Resnick M, Fatusi A, et al. Adolescence and the social determinants of health. Lancet. 2012;379:1641–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60149-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sawyer SM, Afifi RA, Bearinger LH, Blakemore SJ, Dick B, Ezeh AC, et al. Adolescence: a foundation for future health. Lancet. 2012;379:1630–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mallorquí-Bagué N, Vintró-Alcaraz C, Sánchez I, Riesco N, Agüera Z, Granero R, et al. Emotion regulation as a transdiagnostic feature among eating disorders: cross-sectional and longitudinal approach. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2018;26:53–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mallorquí-Bagué N, Testa G, Lozano-Madrid M, Vintró-Alcaraz C, Sánchez I, Riesco N, et al. Emotional and non-emotional facets of impulsivity in eating disorders: from anorexia nervosa to bulimic spectrum disorders. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2020;28:410–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Garofalo C, Velotti P, Zavattini GC. Emotion regulation and aggression: the incremental contribution of alexithymia, impulsivity, and emotion dysregulation facets. Psychol Violence. 2018;8:470–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kalvin CB, Bierman KL. Child and adolescent risk factors that differentially predict violent versus nonviolent crime. Aggress Behav. 2017;43:568–77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Jessor R, Graves TD, Hanson RC, Jessor SL. Society, personality, and deviant behavior: a study of a tri-ethnic community. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jessor R, Jessor SL. Problem behavior and psychosocial development: a longitudinal study of youth. New York: Academic Press; 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Derefinko KJ, Charnigo RJ, Peters JR, Adams ZW, Milich R, Lynam DR. Substance use trajectories from early adolescence through the transition to college. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2016;77:924–35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Schulenberg JE, Johnston LD, O’Malley PM, Bachman JG, Miech RA, Patrick ME. Monitoring the future: college students & adults ages 19–60. 2019. http://monitoringthefuture.org/pubs.html#monographs.

  33. Arria AM, Caldeira KM, Allen HK, Bugbee BA, Vincent KB, Grady KEO. Prevalence and incidence of drug use among college students: an 8-year longitudinal analysis. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2017;43:711–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Skidmore CR, Kaufman EA, Crowell SE. Substance use among college students. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Clin N Am. 2016;25:735–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hall WD, Patton G, Stockings E, Weier M, Lynskey M, Morley KI, et al. Why young people’s substance use matters for global health. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3:265–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(16)00013-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Desmarais SL, Van Dorn RA, Johnson KL, Grimm KJ, Douglas KS, Swartz MS. Community violence perpetration and victimization among adults with mental illnesses. Am J Public Health. 2014;104:2342–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Lim JY, Lui CK. Longitudinal associations between substance use and violence in adolescence through adulthood. J Soc Work Pract Addict. 2016;16:72–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Sussman S, Skara S, Weiner MD, Dent CW. Prediction of violence perpetration among high-risk youth. Am J Health Behav. 2004;28:134–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Azevedo LDS, de Souza APL, Ferreira IMS, Lima DWDC, Pessa RP. Binge eating and alcohol consumption: an integrative review. Eat Weight Disord. 2021;26:759–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-020-00923-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bogusz K, Kopera M, Jakubczyk A, Trucco EM, Kucharska K, Walenda A, et al. Prevalence of alcohol use disorder among individuals who binge eat: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction. 2021;116:18–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Basile KC, Smith SG, Liu Y, Lowe A, Gilmore AK, Khatiwada S, et al. Victim and perpetrator characteristics in alcohol/drug-involved sexual violence victimization in the U.S. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021;226:108839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108839.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Fairburn CG, Beglin S. Eating disorder examination questionnaire. In: Fairburn CG, editor. Cognitive behavioral therapy for eating disorders. New York: Guilford Press; 2008. p. 309–13.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Truglia E, Mannucci E, Lassi S, Rotella CM, Faravelli C, Ricca V. Aggressiveness, anger and eating disorders: a review. Psychopathology. 2006;39:55–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Jennings KM, Wildes JE, Coccaro EF. Intermittent explosive disorder and eating disorders: analysis of national comorbidity and research samples. Compr Psychiatry. 2017;75:62–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2017.02.011.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Gratz KL, Roemer L. Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2004;26:41–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Barratt ES. Anxiety and impulsiveness related to psychomotor efficiency. Percept Mot Skills. 1959;9:191–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Waxmonsky JG, Baweja R, Bansal PS, Waschbusch DA. A review of the evidence base for psychosocial interventions for the treatment of emotion dysregulation in children and adolescents. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2021;30:573–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Samuel E. Benabou for providing editorial assistance.

Funding

No funding was used to support this analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Dr. KTG, Dr. JMN, and Ms. NEL conceptualized the study. Dr. KTG conducted the statistical analyses. Dr. JMN provided statistical consultation. All authors contributed to drafting the manuscript and have approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jason M. Nagata.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

HMS was approved by the Health Sciences and Behavioral Sciences Institutional Review Board at the University of Michigan and all participating institutions. All participants provided written informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ganson, K.T., Lisi, N.E., O’Connor, J. et al. Association between binge eating and physical violence perpetration among U.S. college students. J Eat Disord 10, 171 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-022-00700-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-022-00700-z

Keywords