- Letter to the Editor
- Open Access
Transformative eating disorder research: qualitative research considerations
Journal of Eating Disorders volume 9, Article number: 72 (2021)
This letter identifies the potential of qualitative eating disorder research to work within a transformative paradigm that naturalizes the state of living with an eating disorder. The number of qualitative research publications with persons living with eating disorders have increased, however, a substantive proportion of this qualitative research follows traditional research paradigms that are built upon the assumption that eating disorders signify a personal deficit. Transformative qualitative eating disorder research has potential to include those living with eating disorders in all stages of the research process to ensure that research leads to the de-stigmatization of eating disorders promoting health, wellbeing, and quality of life for persons living with eating disorders.
In recent years there has been an increase in qualitative eating disorder research  which explores the experiences of persons living with eating disorders. However, a number of these studies struggle to grasp the importance of conducting qualitative research in natural settings [2, 3]. Much of this qualitative research has also been grounded in traditional research paradigms, and therefore lack critical and emancipatory strategies, including discourse and discursive analyses, which may have transformative implications for bettering the lives of persons living with eating disorders. Qualitative research, as research in natural settings, should also seek to naturalize the state of living with an eating disorder, rather than using research to legitimize disparate treatment. This recognizes eating disorders as a natural phenomenon, a valid state of being, and promotes autonomy and self-determination surrounding treatment and recovery.
Historically, eating disorders have been positioned as individualised, being caused by personal deficits [1, 2, 4]. I, while taking part in eating disorder hospital programs and as a participant in an, an rTMS randomized control trial on bulimia, had my own data collected. These research opportunities were hopeful for myself, as they held potential for me to get better. However, they also personalized my issue, rather than acknowledged the structural and societal contributors to my eating disorder development and maintenance .
In my work with disabled and autisticFootnote 1 advocates, I have learned approaches to naturalize diversity, promoting inclusivity and acceptance in our society. However, the societal de-stigmatization efforts I encourage for those whom I work with have never extended to me, a woman living with an eating disorder. I am a member of a minority group, an over-researched population, a divergent body and mind. My differences, however, are a cause for concern, something to treat, cure, and eliminate. Yes, the health risks of eating disorders are real, however, I believe that traditional research which promotes the idea of individual deficit does not lead to transformative personal and societal outcomes bettering the lives of persons living with eating disorders.
Inspired by academics in the field of Critical Autism Studies , where autistic authors have begun to question the role of research in perpetuating stigma and power imbalances between autistic persons and a perceived normal . I have begun to question the role of the dominant eating disorder research in stigmatizing my state of being. Informed by principles of community based participatory research , action research , and post-colonial theory , could qualitative eating disorder research occurring with, rather than on, persons living with eating disorders, lead to transformative outcomes?
I encourage future eating disorder researchers to involve stakeholders in their research [9, 10], to recognize those who are researched as experts on their own lived experience  and to critically reflect on how research decisions may have the potential to perpetuate the stigmatization of the persons they aim to assist. Ways to address this are outlined in Table 1.
Availability of data and materials
Leppanen J, Tosunlar L, Blackburn R, Williams S, Tchanturia K, Sedgewick F. Critical incidents in anorexia nervosa: perspectives of those with a lived experience. J Eat Disord. 2021;9(53). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-021-00409-5.
Stockford C, Stenfert Kroese B, Beesley A, Leung N. Women's recovery from anorexia nervosa: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research. Eat Disord. 2019;27(4):343–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/10640266.2018.1512301 Epub 2018 Sep 24. PMID: 30247988.
Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry and research design choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1998.
Vuillier L, Robertson S, Greville-Harris M. Orthorexic tendencies are linked with difficulties with emotion identification and regulation. J Eat Disord. 2020;8(15). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-020-00291-7.
Harrison C. Anti-diet: reclaim your time, money, well-being and happiness through intuitive eating. New York: Little, Brown Spark; 2019.
Woods R, Milton D, Arnold L, Graby S. Redefining Critical Autism Studies: a more inclusive interpretation. Disabil Soc. 2018;33(6). https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2018.1454380.
Gillespie-Lynch K, Kapp SK, Brooks PJ, Pickens J, Schwartzman B. Whose expertise is it? Evidence for autistic adults as critical autism experts. Front Psychol. 2017;8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00438.
Bertilsdotter Rosqvist H, Kourti M, Jackson-Perry D, Brownlow C, Fletcher K, Bendelman D, et al. Doing it differently: emancipatory autism studies within a neurodiverse academic space. Disabil Soc. 2019;34(7–8):1082–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2019.1603102.
Balaz CL, Morello-Frosch R. The three R's: how community based participatory research strengthens the rigor, relevance and reach of science. Environ Justice. 2013;6(1). https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2012.0017.
Freire P. Pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth: Penguin Education; 1972.
I wish to thank the two anonymous reviewers who provided helpful comments and suggestions that helped improve and clarify this manuscript, and Springer Nature’s Journal of Eating Disorders for accepting a waiver of article-processing charges.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
I consent for this editorial to be published
The author declares that he/she has no competing interests
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Janse van Rensburg, M.G. Transformative eating disorder research: qualitative research considerations. J Eat Disord 9, 72 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-021-00428-2
- Qualitative research
- emancipatory research
- diversity studies
- eating disorders
- community-based research