Skip to main content

Health and health-related quality of life among treatment-seeking overweight and obese adults: associations with internalized weight bias



Weight bias is widespread and has numerous harmful consequences. The internalization of weight bias has been associated with significant psychological impairment. Other forms of discrimination, such as racial and anti-gay bias, have been shown to be associated with physical health impairment. However, research has not yet examined whether internalized weight bias is associated with physical as well as psychological impairment in health-related quality of life.


Participants included 120 treatment-seeking overweight and obese adults (mean body mass index = 35.09; mean age = 48.31; 68% female; 59% mixed or Asian ethnicity). Participants were administered measures of internalized weight bias and physical and mental health-related quality of life, and they were assessed for the presence of chronic medical conditions, use of prescription and non-prescription medications, and current exercise.


Internalized weight bias was significantly correlated with health impairment in both physical (r = −.25) and mental (r = −.48) domains. In multivariate analyses controlling for body mass index, age, and other physical health indicators, internalized weight bias significantly and independently predicted impairment in both physical (β = −.31) and mental (β = −.47) health.


Internalized weight bias was associated with greater impairment in both the physical and mental domains of health-related quality of life. Internalized weight bias also contributed significantly to the variance in physical and mental health impairment over and above the contributions of BMI, age, and medical comorbidity. Consistent with the association between prejudice and physical health in other minority groups, these findings suggest a link between the effects of internalized weight-based discrimination and physical health. Research is needed on strategies to prevent weight bias and its internalization on both a societal and individual level.


Increased body weight is associated with impairments in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) [1]. Findings from population studies in different countries such as the U.S. [2, 3], Sweden [4], Germany [5], and Taiwan [6] suggest that higher body mass index (BMI; kg/m2) is correlated with greater physical impairment in HRQoL. HRQoL, which refers to the effects of physical and mental health on everyday functioning, is increasingly regarded as a key outcome of health promotion programs and in clinical practice [7].

Overweight and obese individuals are far more likely to experience discrimination than their non-overweight peers [8]. This discrimination occurs in a range of settings, including medical, educational, and interpersonal contexts, and it is associated with a range of adverse personal, social, and economic outcomes [9, 10]. One of the most pernicious aspects of weight-based discrimination is its tendency to become internalized. The term internalized weight bias (IWB), namely, the belief that weight-based stereotypes and prejudices are accurate and apply to the self, was introduced to describe this process [11]. In clinical and non-clinical obese samples, higher levels of IWB have been found to be associated with greater body dissatisfaction, more severe eating disturbances, higher levels of general psychological distress, and lower self-esteem [1114].

In view of these associations, it is reasonable to hypothesize that IWB may be associated with impairment in HRQoL. Findings from one recent study suggested that IWB may be associated with poorer HRQoL among individuals with serious mental illness [15]. IWB was recently shown to mediate the relationship between BMI and weight-related quality of life, suggesting that weight-related impairments may be accounted for, in part, by weight-related self-stigma [16]. There is also evidence that discrimination is associated with adverse health outcomes in minority populations [17, 18]. For example, perceived anti-gay discrimination predicted increased physician visits and medication use [19], while among African-American adolescents, perceived unfair treatment based on physical appearance was associated with elevated ambulatory blood pressure [20].

Research is needed to examine impairment in general HRQoL associated with IWB among individuals who are overweight or obese. In view of the multiple health-related conditions associated with obesity [21, 22] and the impairment in HRQoL [16], it may be important to examine whether IWB predicts poorer physical and mental health outcomes. The goal of the present study was to address this gap in the literature by examining the associations between IWB and HRQoL in a treatment-seeking sample of overweight and obese individuals. We were particularly interested in considering whether any observed associations between obesity and impairment in HRQoL would still be apparent after controlling for the occurrence of those chronic medical conditions known to be associated with obesity and with physical and mental health impairment. We also wanted to test whether the health impairments associated with obesity are more closely associated with the psychological sequelae of being overweight in a stigmatizing society, than with body weight itself [2325]. Therefore, the present cross-sectional study examined the association between IWB and HRQoL, while controlling for body mass index, as well as age and medical comorbidity.


Participants and procedures

Participants were individuals (n = 120) who were screened for a behavioral weight-loss treatment program, recruited from nine community centres across the Honolulu-metro area of Hawaii. Leaders of community centres who wished to participate in an obesity treatment program assisted the researchers in conducting recruitment among members via email, flyers, and announcements at group meetings. Centres included community groups such as the Young Men’s Christian Association, Young Women’s Christian Association, and religious institutions such as churches and temples. Participants interested in the treatment study attended an informational meeting at which they were screened for eligibility and completed the measures described below. The present study included all overweight individuals who applied and were screened to participate in the treatment trial, including those who were not eligible for participation (18%) or choose not to enroll in treatment (7%). Most individuals who were excluded from the trial were excluded on account of medical comorbidity but were included in the current study in order to maximize variability in the sample’s health status. Participants who were not included in the treatment trial did not differ from those who were included with respect to age, sex, or BMI. The study procedures were approved by the University of Hawaii Institutional Review Board, and informed consent was provided by all participants.

Study measures

Weight bias internalization scale (WBIS)

The WBIS [4] assesses the degree to which respondents believe that negative stereotypes and negative self-statements about being overweight apply to themselves. Eleven questionnaire items are rated on a 7-point scale from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree” (e.g. “As an overweight person, I feel that I am just as competent as anyone”). The WBIS has shown high internal consistency and convergent validity in a community sample of overweight and obese adults [11] as well as in a clinical sample of overweight and obese adults seeking treatment for binge eating disorder [26]. Higher scores indicate greater internalized bias. Internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) in the current sample was .71.

Medical outcomes study short-form (SF-12)

The SF-12 [27] is a widely used 12-item measure of health-related quality of life. Items are summarized into two weighted scales representing perceived impairment in role functioning associated with physical (Physical Component Summary scale, PCS) and mental (Mental Component Summary scale, MCS) health problems. The SF-12 has been demonstrated to have excellent reliability and validity [27]. Each scale is scored to have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10, with lower scores indicating greater impairment. The RAND scoring method, which employs factor weightings derived by means of oblique, rather than orthogonal, factor rotation, was used on account of its superior psychometric properties and recommended use in clinical samples [28]. Internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) in the current sample was .72 for the PCS and .76 for the MCS.

Information was also collected about the occurrence of chronic medical conditions and about current use of prescription and non-prescription medications. Participants filled out a checklist of 28 serious medical conditions (e.g., diabetes, hypertension), responded to on a yes or no basis. Medications currently taken were assessed by asking participants to rate the frequency with which they took eight categories of commonly used non-prescription medications over the past six months (rated on a Likert scale from 1 = not at all to 7 = more than once a day). They were also asked to indicate whether they were taking medications from a list of five categories of common prescription medications, responded to on a yes or no basis. Participants also indicated whether (yes or no) they were currently exercising regularly. Demographic information collected included age and ethnic background. BMI was calculated based on weight and height measured by a digital scale (Tanita BWBG-800) and stadiometer, respectively.

Statistical analysis

Participant characteristics were summarized by computing HRQoL subscale scores, WBIS scores, and health-related variables. Analysis of covariance controlling for BMI and age was used to explore potential differences in WBIS scores between participants who reported the presence or absence of a serious medical disorder, use or non-use of prescription medication, and the occurrence or absence of regular exercise. To assess the relationship between internalized bias and quality of life, Pearson product moment correlations were computed between WBIS scores and PCS and MCS. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis was used to examine the independent contribution of WBIS scores to the variance in PCS and MCS scores, controlling for BMI, age, and physical health indicators. Health indicators entered included the presence or absence of any serious medical condition, frequency of non-prescription medication use, and the occurrence or absence of regular exercise (dichotomous variables were dummy coded). By entering the variables of BMI, age, exercise, medical conditions, and medication use in step one, and IWB in step 2, this analysis permitted the identification of the independent contribution of IWB over and above the step 1 variables. In preliminary analyses stratified by gender, effect sizes were similar in women and men; therefore, data were combined in subsequent analyses.


Participant characteristics

Participants had a mean BMI of 35.09 (SD = 7.65) and mean age of 48.31 (SD = 13.32), and 67.5% were female. The sample was 29% overweight and 71% obese (BMI range: 25.2 – 66.4; age range: 20–77 years). Participants self-identified as Caucasian (30%), Asian (20%), Pacific Islander or Native Hawaiian (8%), Latino or Latina (3%), and mixed ethnicity (39%). Sixty-seven percent of participants reported the presence of a serious medical condition, 58% reported currently taking a prescription medication, and 15% reported currently exercising. Across eight categories of non-prescription drugs, the mean frequency of reported use was 1.77 (SD = .76), indicating that, on average, participants had taken several non-prescription medications “once or twice” in the past six months. After controlling for BMI and age, there were no differences in WBIS scores between participants who reported the presence or absence of a serious medical condition, use or non-use of prescription medication, and the occurrence or absence of regular exercise. Mean scores (SD) on WBIS, PCS, and MCS in the total sample were, respectively, 3.86 (1.06), 45.78 (8.62), and 45.47 (9.20).

Associations between IWB and HRQoL

WBIS scores were significantly correlated with both the physical health (r = −.25, p = .01) and mental health (r = −.48, p < .001) subscales of the SF-12. These correlations indicate effect sizes of a medium and large magnitude, respectively [29]. The results were unchanged when the effects of BMI were controlled by means of partial correlation analysis.

Relative contribution of IWB to HRQoL

Separate hierarchical regression analyses were conducted for SF-12 PCS and MCS scores with BMI, age, and physical health indicators (exercise, medical conditions, and medication use) entered at the first step and WBIS scores entered at the second step. As shown in Table 1, WBIS scores significantly predicted PCS scores, over and above the contributions of BMI, age, and physical health indicators. Higher WBIS scores were associated with lower PCS scores (greater physical health impairment). The occurrence of regular exercise was also independently associated with PCS scores, such that participants who exercised regularly had higher PCS scores than those who did not.

Table 1 Hierarchical multiple regression analyses predicting physical health-related quality of life and mental health-related quality of life

A similar pattern was observed when the SF-12 MCS was the dependent variable. Higher scores on the WBIS were associated with lower MCS scores (greater mental health impairment) over and above the contributions of BMI, age, and physical health indicators. In this case, WBIS was the only significant predictor variable.


We examined associations between IWB and impairment in HRQoL in a treatment-seeking sample of overweight and obese men and women. The main findings were twofold. First, IWB was associated with greater perceived impairment in both the physical and mental health domains of HRQoL. Second, IWB contributed significantly and independently to the variance in physical and mental health impairment over and above the contributions of BMI, age, exercise, medical conditions, and medication use. The association between IWB and health impairment among overweight and obese individuals is consistent with past studies demonstrating that prejudice and internalized bias may be linked to adverse health outcomes in other commonly stigmatized groups, such as gays, lesbians, bisexuals, and ethnic minorities [18, 30, 31]. For example, internalized racism has been associated with negative health outcomes among African Americans [32, 33]. It has been proposed that the stress associated with IWB may have a significant impact on cardiovascular health and metabolic abnormalities, which could potentially lead to poorer health, weight gain, and increased risk of internalized stigma [10]. Stress associated with internalized bias may also lead to unhealthy coping behaviors, such as smoking, alcohol or substance use [34] or binge eating [12]. Another potential coping behavior that could lead to poor HRQoL is avoidance. Phobic anxiety and avoidance of specific situations may result among obese individuals who have experienced weight stigma [35].

Although the cross-sectional design of the current study precludes any conclusions concerning the direction of the observed associations, it is worth considering the possibility that weight bias and its internalization may be conducive to adverse health outcomes among overweight and obese individuals, that is, in addition to the more commonly accepted view that impairment in HRQoL is a consequence of obesity. The present findings suggest that future research using prospective study designs should continue to address this issue.

The finding that, in this clinical sample of overweight and obese individuals, IWB was associated with significant impairment in both physical and mental health domains of HRQoL, independent of its association with medical comorbidity, suggests that it may be important to include the reduction of IWB as a key therapeutic goal of obesity treatment programs. There is some evidence that this goal is viable. For example, a day-long intervention directed at alleviating internalized bias by teaching acceptance and mindfulness significantly reduced IWB in obese participants in one recent trial [36]. Future research of this kind should include assessment of the potential benefits of reducing IWB on specific aspects of HRQoL. Whether weight bias can be reduced at the population level is less clear [37]. Therefore, from a public health perspective, it may be especially important to test the efficacy of health promotion and early intervention programs that seek to preempt the adverse effects of IWB on obese individuals’ quality of life.

Other limitations of the present study - that is, other than the use of cross-sectional study design - should be noted. First, we relied on a single, brief measure of HRQoL that yields scores on subscales relating to only physical and mental health impairment. Although the SF-12 is widely used and has good psychometric properties, the use of a more comprehensive measure, such as the SF-36, would be desirable. It would also be desirable to include an obesity-specific measure of HRQoL in future research e.g., [38], particularly in research designed to evaluate the effects of clinical intervention on levels of IWB, since a measure of this kind may be more sensitive to change. It would be interesting to examine how strong the correlation might be between IWB and an obesity-specific measure of HRQoL. Second, and whereas the assessment of medical comorbidity is a strength of the present study, other variables likely to be associated with both body weight and HRQoL were not assessed. The role of body dissatisfaction and eating-disordered behavior may be particularly important in this regard [23, 39, 40]. Future studies should also examine the relative effects of depression alongside those of IWB. Considering the relationship between obesity, depression, and HRQoL [41], it is possible that depression may account for variance in HRQoL or may mediate the relationship between WBIS and HRQoL. In addition, it should be noted that the assessment of medical comorbidity and related variables was by self-report. Data bearing on actual (diagnosed) medical comorbidity and documented use of medication would, of course, be preferable. Finally, the current study included a large proportion of Asian participants and participants of mixed (primarily Asian, Pacific Islander, and Caucasian) descent. The use of this this study population may limit the generalizability of the findings, although the choice of study population might also be considered a strength of the study, given the reliance on Western populations in most previous research. In any case, further research exploring the associations of IWB with impairment in quality of life, in different study populations, would be welcome.


In sum, the current findings suggest that internalized bias may be associated not only with important psychological outcomes, as shown in past research [1114, 26], but also with physical health outcomes as well. Given the relative ineffectiveness of studies attempting to reduce obesity stigma at a societal level [37], it may be important to focus on preventing the potential negative psychological outcomes associated with IWB among overweight and obese patients. It is possible that targeting IWB in clinical settings might improve not only patients’ psychological well-being, but perhaps their physical health functioning as well.


  1. 1.

    de Zwaan M, Petersen I, Kaerber M, Burgmer R, Nolting B, Legenbauer T, Benecke A, Herpertz S: Obesity and quality of life: a controlled study of normal-weight and obese individuals. Psychosomatics. 2009, 50: 474-482.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Jia H, Lubetkin EI: The impact of obesity on health-related quality-of-life in the general adult US population. J Public Health. 2005, 27: 156-164. 10.1093/pubmed/fdi025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Hassan MK, Joshi AV, Madhavan SS, Amonkar MM: Obesity and health-related quality of life: a cross-sectional analysis of the US population. Int J Obes. 2003, 27: 1227-1232. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802396.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Larsson U, Karlsson J, Sullivan M: Impact of overweight and obesity on health-related quality of life – a Swedish population study. Int J Obes. 2002, 26: 417-424. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801919.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Mond JM, Baune BT: Overweight, medical comorbidity and health-related quality of life in a community sample of women and men. Obesity. 2009, 17: 1627-1634. 10.1038/oby.2009.27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Huang I-C, Frangakis C, Wu AW: The relationship of excess body weight and health-related quality of life: evidence from a population study in Taiwan. Int J Obes. 2006, 30: 1250-1259. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Calvert M, Blazeby J, Revicki D, Moher D, Brundage M: Reporting quality of life in clinical trials: a CONSORT extension. Lancet. 2011, 378: 1684-1685. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61256-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Carr D, Friedman MA: Is obesity stigmatizing? body weight, perceived discrimination, and psychological well-being in the united states. J Health Soc Beh. 2005, 46: 244-259. 10.1177/002214650504600303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Puhl R, Heuer CA: The stigma of obesity: a review and update. Obesity. 2009, 17: 941-964. 10.1038/oby.2008.636.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Puhl RM, Latner JD: Stigma, obesity, and the health of the nation’s children. Psychol Bulletin. 2007, 133: 557-580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Durso LE, Latner JD: Understanding self-directed stigma: development of the weight bias internalization scale. Obesity. 2008, 16: S80-S86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Durso LE, Latner JD, Hayashi K: Discrimination as a risk factor for binge eating in stigmatized groups. Obes Facts. in press

  13. 13.

    Carels RA, Wott CB, Young KM, Gumble A, Koball A, Oehlhof MW: Implicit, explicit and internalized weight bias and psychosocial maladjustment among treatment-seeking adults. Eat Behav. 2010, 11: 180-185. 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2010.03.002.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Roberto CA, Sysko R, Bush J, Pearl R, Puhl RM, Schvey NA, Dovidio JF: Clinical correlates of the weight bias internalization scale in a sample of obese adolescents seeking bariatric surgery. Obesity. 2012, 20: 533-9. 10.1038/oby.2011.123.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Barber JA, Palmese L, Reutenauer EL, Grilo CM, Tek C: Implications of weight-based stigma and self-bias on quality of life among individuals with schizophrenia. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2011, 199: 431-435. 10.1097/NMD.0b013e318221403d.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Lillis J, Levin ME, Hayes SC: Exploring the relationship between body mass index and health-related quality of life: a pilot study of the impact of weight self-stigma and experiential avoidance. J Health Psychol. 2011, 16: 722-727.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Krieger M: Embodying inequality: a review of concepts, measures and methods for study. Int J Health Services. 1999, 29: 295-352. 10.2190/M11W-VWXE-KQM9-G97Q.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Pascoe EA, Richman LS: Perceived discrimination and health: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Bulletin. 2009, 135: 531-554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Huebner DM, Davis MC: Perceived anti-gay discrimination and physical health outcomes. Heal Psychol. 2007, 26: 627-634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Matthews KA, Salomon K, Kenyon K, Zhou F: Unfair treatment, discrimination, and ambulatory blood pressure in black and white adolescents. Heal Psychol. 2005, 24: 258-265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Bray GA: Medical consequences of obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004, 89: 2583-2589. 10.1210/jc.2004-0535.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Malnick SDH, Knobler H: The medical complications of obesity. Q J Med. 2006, 99: 565-579. 10.1093/qjmed/hcl085.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Mond JM, Rodgers B, Hay PJ, Darby A, Owen C, Baune BT, Kennedy RL: Obesity and impairment in psychosocial functioning in women: the mediating role of eating disorder features. Obesity. 2007, 15: 2769-2779. 10.1038/oby.2007.329.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Muennig P, Jia H, Lee R, Lubetkin E: I think therefore I am: perceived ideal weight as a determinant of health. Am J Public Health. 2008, 98: 501-506. 10.2105/AJPH.2007.114769.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Muennig P, Bench KK: Obesity-associated stigma and physiological markers of stress: evidence from the Dominican republic. Stress Heal. 2009, 25: 241-246. 10.1002/smi.1243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Durso LE, Latner JD, White MA, Masheb RM, Blomquist KK, Morgan PT, Grilo CM: Internalized weight bias in obese patients with binge eating disorder: associations with eating disturbances and psychological functioning. Int J Eat Disord. 2012, 45: 423-427. 10.1002/eat.20933.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Ware J, Kosinski M, Keller SD: A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996, 34: 220-33. 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Windsor TD, Rodgers B, Butterworth P, Anstey KJ, Jorm AF: Measuring physical and mental health using the SF-12: implications for community surveys of mental health. Aust NZ J Psych. 2006, 40: 797-803. 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01886.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Cohen J: A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992, 112: 155-159.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Institute of Medicine: The health of lesbian, Gay, bisexual, and transgender people: building a foundation for better understanding. 2011, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Meyer IH: Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychol Bulletin. 2003, 129: 674-697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Butler C, Tull ES, Chambers EC, Taylor J: Internalized racism, body fat distribution, and abnormal fasting glucose among African-Caribbean women in Dominica, West Indies. J Nat Med Assoc. 2001, 94: 143-148.

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Tull ES, Sheu YT, Butler C, Cornelious K: Relationships between perceived stress, coping behavior and cortisol secretion in women with high and low levels of internalized racism. J Nat Med Assoc. 2005, 97: 206-212.

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Cooper H, Friedman S, Tempalski B, Friedman R, Keem M: Racial/ethnic disparities in injection drug use in large US metropolitan areas. Ann Epidemiology. 2005, 15: 326-334. 10.1016/j.annepidem.2004.10.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Friedman KE, Ashmore JA, Applegate CL: Recent experiences of weight-based stigmatization in a weight loss surgery population: Psychological and behavioral correlates. Obesity. 2008, 16: S69-S74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Lillis J, Luoma JB, Levin ME, Hayes SC: Measuring weight self-stigma: The weight self-stigma questionnaire. Obesity. 2010, 18: 971-976. 10.1038/oby.2009.353.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Daníelsdóttir S, O’Brien KS, Ciao A: Anti-fat prejudice reduction: A review of published studies. Obes Facts. 2010, 3: 47-58. 10.1159/000277067.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Kolotkin RL, Crosby RD, Kosloski KD, Williams GR: Development of a brief measure to assess quality of life in obesity. Obes Res. 2001, 9: 102-111. 10.1038/oby.2001.13.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Mond JM, van den Berg P, Boutelle K, Neumark-Sztainer D, Hannan PJ: Obesity, body dissatisfaction, and psycho-social functioning in early and late adolescence: findings from the Project EAT Study. J Adolescent Health. 2011, 48: 373-378. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.07.022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Hay P, Mond J, Buttner P, Darby A: Eating disorder behaviors are increasing: Findings from two sequential community surveys in South Australia. PLOSone. 2008, 3: e1541-

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Vetter ML, Wadden TA, Lavenberg J, Moore RH, Volger S, Perez JL, Sarwer DB, Tsai AG: Relation of health-related quality of life to metabolic syndrome, obesity, depression and comorbid illnesses. Int J Obes. 2011, 35: 1087-1094. 10.1038/ijo.2010.230.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This research was supported by a grant from the Hawaii Medical Services Association Foundation.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janet D Latner.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

JDL obtained the grant from which this research was funded, conceived of the study design, carried out analyses, and drafted the manuscript. LED participated in the design of the study, contributed to the statistical analyses, and helped edit the manuscript. JMM participated in the design of the study and helped to edit the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Latner, J.D., Durso, L.E. & Mond, J.M. Health and health-related quality of life among treatment-seeking overweight and obese adults: associations with internalized weight bias. J Eat Disord 1, 3 (2013).

Download citation


  • Internalized weight bias
  • Health-related quality of life
  • Obesity
  • Overweight
  • Physical health impairment
  • Mental health impairment