Clinician perspectives of the implementation of an early intervention service for eating disorders in England: a mixed method study

Table 7 Multi-level models for the change in NoMAD scores from pre-training (Time 1) to post-training (Time 2) and 3-month follow-up (Time 3)

Outcome	ICC	Predictors	b (SE)	β (SE)	t	df	p
Coherence	0.36	Time: Linear	1.98 (0.40)	3.95 (0.80)	4.96	240	<0.001
		Time: Quadratic^a	−0.99 (0.34)	−1.98 (0.68)	−2.92	240	<0.005
Cognitive Participation	0.51	Time: Linear	0.92 (0.35)	2.01 (0.76)	2.63	239	<0.01
		Time: Quadratic^a	−0.33 (0.31)	−0.70 (0.68)	−1.06	239	0.30
Collective Action	0.50	Time: Linear	1.46 (0.45)	2.64 (0.81)	3.26	237	<0.005
		Time: Quadratic^a	−1.15 (0.34)	−2.08 (0.61)	−3.40	237	<0.001
Reflexive Monitoring	0.42	Time: Linear	1.79 (0.39)	3.58 (0.79)	4.50	239	<0.001
		Time: Quadratic^a	−0.71 (0.35)	−1.42 (0.71)	−2.00	239	<0.05

Note Significant predictors are indicated in bold. ^aNegative quadratic values indicate concave shaped relationship, whereas positive values indicate convex

ISSN: 2050-2974