Skip to main content

Table 9 Results of cross-lagged panel model regarding the effect of response-style strategies on the frequency of distraction in Grade n + 1

From: Longitudinal associations between response-style strategies and abnormal eating behaviors/attitudes in adolescents: a cross-lagged panel model

IVs (Grade n)

Intervals

G4 → G5

G5 → G6

G6 → G7

G7 → G8

G8 → G9

β

SE

p

β

SE

p

β

SE

p

β

SE

p

β

SE

p

Sex (ref. = boy)

− .077

.013

.000

− .039

.012

.001

− .011

.012

.375

.004

.013

.774

− .014

.015

.332

Cohort (ref. = the lowest Cohort #)

.003

.021

.871

− .025

.018

.153

− .040

.018

.021

− .012

.022

.570

− .115

.029

.000

SES

− .010

.013

.432

− .037

.013

.004

− .036

.014

.009

− .036

.015

.015

− .029

.017

.078

BMI

− .022

.013

.094

− .007

.013

.560

− .013

.013

.304

.019

.013

.141

− .013

.014

.384

Depressive symptoms

− .122

.012

.000

− .127

.009

.000

− .129

.007

.000

− .137

.009

.000

− .144

.014

.000

Problem-solving

.070

.012

.000

.056

.009

.000

.041

.007

.000

.026

.009

.002

.011

.013

.369

Rumination

− .051

.012

.000

− .046

.009

.000

− .040

.007

.000

− .035

.009

.000

− .029

.013

.027

Distraction

.350

.012

.000

.393

.009

.000

.417

.008

.000

.455

.009

.000

.492

.012

.000

Drive for thinness

.021

.020

.289

.017

.012

.147

.015

.009

.074

.015

.010

.134

.015

.014

.297

Binge eating/purging

.014

.014

.316

.016

.009

.082

.018

.007

.008

.022

.008

.007

.027

.012

.027

  1. SES Socioeconomic status, BMI Body mass index