Skip to main content

Table 8 Results of cross-lagged panel model regarding the effect of response-style strategies on the frequency of problem-solving in Grade n + 1

From: Longitudinal associations between response-style strategies and abnormal eating behaviors/attitudes in adolescents: a cross-lagged panel model

IVs (Grade n)

Intervals

G4 → G5

G5 → G6

G6 → G7

G7 → G8

G8 → G9

β

SE

p

β

SE

p

β

SE

p

β

SE

p

β

SE

p

Sex (ref. = boy)

.019

.013

.127

.044

.012

.000

.029

.012

.018

.027

.013

.044

.031

.015

.042

Cohort (ref. = the lowest Cohort #)

.055

.021

.010

.055

.018

.002

.070

.018

.000

.026

.022

.247

− .024

.031

.430

SES

.050

.013

.000

.058

.013

.000

.051

.014

.000

.039

.015

.010

.039

.017

.023

BMI

− .012

.014

.366

− .014

.013

.253

− .015

.013

.229

− .014

.014

.301

− .007

.015

.619

Depressive symptoms

− .105

.012

.000

− .107

.009

.000

− .109

.007

.000

− .112

.010

.000

− .116

.014

.000

Problem-solving

.390

.012

.000

.409

.010

.000

.433

.008

.000

.444

.010

.000

.475

.013

.000

Rumination

.020

.013

.108

.024

.009

.007

.028

.007

.000

.033

.009

.000

.039

.013

.004

Distraction

.026

.012

.030

.024

.009

.005

.021

.007

.002

.019

.009

.033

.016

.013

.195

Drive for thinness

.012

.020

.529

.011

.012

.338

.011

.009

.200

.012

.010

.251

.013

.015

.385

Binge eating/purging

− .039

.014

.007

− .025

.009

.006

− .015

.007

.028

− .007

.008

.415

.002

.013

.864

  1. SES Socioeconomic status, BMI Body mass index