Skip to main content

Table 7 Results of cross-lagged panel model regarding the effect of response-style strategies on the severity of rumination in Grade n + 1

From: Longitudinal associations between response-style strategies and abnormal eating behaviors/attitudes in adolescents: a cross-lagged panel model

IVs (Grade n)

Intervals

G4 → G5

G5 → G6

G6 → G7

G7 → G8

G8 → G9

β

SE

p

β

SE

p

β

SE

p

β

SE

p

β

SE

p

Sex (ref. = boy)

.037

.012

.002

.051

.011

.000

.059

.012

.000

.053

.012

.000

.049

.013

.000

Cohort (ref. = the lowest Cohort #)

− .070

.020

.000

− .029

.017

.082

− .050

.017

.003

− .022

.020

.267

− .005

.027

.859

SES

.006

.012

.646

− .005

.012

.671

.015

.013

.246

− .002

.014

.901

− .014

.015

.351

BMI

− .028

.013

.030

− .015

.012

.191

.002

.012

.879

− .018

.012

.145

− .015

.013

.253

Depressive symptoms

.110

.011

.000

.105

.008

.000

.096

.007

.000

.091

.009

.000

.083

.013

.000

Problem-solving

.030

.012

.011

.030

.008

.000

.029

.007

.000

.028

.008

.000

.028

.011

.013

Rumination

.442

.011

.000

.485

.009

.000

.510

.008

.000

.554

.009

.000

.594

.011

.000

Distraction

− .023

.011

.043

− .021

.008

.008

− .018

.006

.004

− .016

.008

.042

− .014

.011

.207

Drive for thinness

.077

.019

.000

.063

.011

.000

.057

.008

.000

.054

.009

.000

.053

.013

.000

Binge eating/purging

.028

.013

.040

.023

.008

.007

.020

.006

.002

.019

.008

.012

.019

.011

.094

  1. SES Socioeconomic status, BMI Body mass index