Skip to main content

Table 6 Results of cross-lagged panel model regarding the effect of response-style strategies on the severity of binge eating/purging in Grade n + 1

From: Longitudinal associations between response-style strategies and abnormal eating behaviors/attitudes in adolescents: a cross-lagged panel model

IVs (Grade n)

Intervals

G4 → G5

G5 → G6

G6 → G7

G7 → G8

G8 → G9

β

SE

p

β

SE

p

β

SE

p

β

SE

p

β

SE

p

Sex (ref. = boy)

− .031

.012

.013

− .014

.012

.265

.013

.013

.314

.030

.013

.022

.013

.014

.357

Cohort (ref. = the lowest Cohort #)

.042

.024

.084

.044

.023

.053

.037

.022

.096

.023

.024

.324

− .160

.028

.000

SES

− .004

.013

.724

− .011

.013

.381

− .050

.013

.000

− .006

.014

.658

− .005

.016

.735

BMI

.060

.013

.000

.057

.013

.000

.019

.013

.143

.001

.013

.929

.040

.014

.004

Depressive symptoms

.039

.012

.001

.035

.009

.000

.028

.007

.000

.021

.009

.025

.014

.013

.295

Problem-solving

− .009

.011

.443

− .009

.008

.294

− .008

.007

.246

− .007

.009

.399

− .007

.012

.575

Rumination

.030

.012

.010

.033

.009

.000

.034

.007

.000

.035

.009

.000

.035

.012

.004

Distraction

.024

.011

.029

.026

.008

.002

.024

.007

.000

.023

.009

.007

.021

.011

.062

Drive for thinness

.024

.018

.180

.019

.011

.090

.015

.008

.078

.012

.010

.230

.010

.013

.473

Binge eating/purging

.534

.014

.000

.530

.010

.000

.537

.009

.000

.552

.009

.000

.596

.011

.000

  1. SES Socioeconomic status, BMI Body mass index