Skip to main content

Table 5 Results of cross-lagged panel model regarding the effect of response-style strategies on the severity of drive for thinness

From: Longitudinal associations between response-style strategies and abnormal eating behaviors/attitudes in adolescents: a cross-lagged panel model

IVs (Grade n)

Intervals

G4 → G5

G5 → G6

G6 → G7

G7 → G8

G8 → G9

β

SE

p

β

SE

p

β

SE

p

β

SE

p

β

SE

p

Sex (ref. = boy)

.064

.011

.000

.097

.011

.000

.137

.011

.000

.192

.011

.000

.190

.012

.000

Cohort (ref. = the lowest Cohort #)

.135

.020

.000

.178

.018

.000

.129

.019

.000

.043

.021

.040

− .383

.023

.000

SES

− .018

.011

.111

− .058

.011

.000

− .047

.012

.000

− .005

.013

.678

− .048

.014

.001

BMI

.102

.011

.000

.119

.011

.000

.092

.011

.000

.086

.012

.000

.090

.012

.000

Depressive symptoms

.073

.010

.000

.063

.008

.000

.047

.006

.000

.029

.008

.001

.009

.012

.453

Problem-solving

.001

.010

.922

− .002

.007

.754

− .006

.006

.351

− .009

.008

.244

− .012

.010

.265

Rumination

.014

.010

.145

.029

.008

.000

.045

.006

.000

.060

.008

.000

.071

.011

.000

Distraction

− .011

.009

.256

− .003

.007

.712

.007

.006

.275

.016

.008

.040

.023

.010

.024

Drive for thinness

.522

.018

.000

.510

.012

.000

.534

.011

.000

.556

.011

.000

.568

.012

.000

Binge eating/purging

.049

.011

.000

.034

.008

.000

.021

.006

.000

.009

.007

.201

− .003

.010

.761

  1. SES Socioeconomic status, BMI Body mass index