Skip to main content

Table 10 Results of cross-lagged panel model regarding the effect of response-style strategies on the severity of depressive symptoms in Grade n + 1

From: Longitudinal associations between response-style strategies and abnormal eating behaviors/attitudes in adolescents: a cross-lagged panel model

IVs (Grade n)

Intervals

G4 → G5

G5 → G6

G6 → G7

G7 → G8

G8 → G9

β

SE

p

β

SE

p

β

SE

p

β

SE

p

β

SE

p

Sex (ref. = boy)

.026

.010

.009

.029

.010

.004

.006

.011

.608

.030

.011

.009

-.012

.013

.363

Cohort (ref. = the lowest Cohort #)

− .026

.015

.094

− .026

.013

.042

− .060

.015

.000

.025

.019

.182

.050

.025

.047

SES

− .023

.011

.031

− .016

.011

.162

.009

.012

.457

− .009

.013

.505

.018

.014

.217

BMI

.023

.011

.042

.013

.011

.214

.041

.011

.000

.004

.012

.735

.002

.013

.862

Depressive symptoms

.481

.010

.000

.522

.008

.000

.543

.007

.000

.588

.008

.000

.630

.011

.000

Problem-solving

− .072

.011

.000

− .071

.008

.000

− .067

.006

.000

− .065

.008

.000

− .064

.011

.000

Rumination

.127

.011

.000

.118

.008

.000

.106

.006

.000

.098

.008

.000

.090

.011

.000

Distraction

− .021

.011

.051

− .024

.008

.002

− .025

.006

.000

− .027

.008

.000

− .029

.010

.006

Drive for thinness

.090

.018

.000

.062

.010

.000

.044

.008

.000

.032

.009

.000

.022

.012

.067

Binge eating/purging

− .018

.013

.172

− .010

.008

.224

− .004

.006

.530

.001

.007

.859

.006

.010

.533

  1. SES Socioeconomic status, BMI: body mass index