Table 2 Characteristics of cross-sectional studies

Wales et al. [49]

To assess the relative importance of qualitative statements about the transition from CAMHS to AMHS for EDs

BEAT, First Steps, Eating Disorders and Carers UK, United Kingdom

Patients, caregivers,

providers

(n = 28)

Prospective cross-sectional study, using a Q-methodology sort task, with a normal distribution pattern scale

Important factors: involving parents and caregivers in the transition process, facilitating effective transitions between services, supporting patients through transitions, and ensuring timely, patient-centered care

Winston et al. [51]

To establish how well recommendations for managing transitions from CAMHS to AMHS for EDs are being met

RCPsych National Training Days, England

Service teams

(n = 38)

Prospective cross-sectional survey of CEDS-CYP teams, based on RCPsych guidance for ED transitions

Most teams compliant in providing transition protocols (52.6%), individual transition plans (78.9%), joint care with adult services (89.5%), and support to families (73.7%); yet few referred ED patients to specialist AMHS (15.8%)