Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of quality assessment with the Down and Black Checklist

From: Systematic review of prospective studies assessing risk factors to predict anorexia nervosa onset

 

Stice et al. [45]

Stice and Desjardins [46]

Tyrka [50]

Reporting

Aims are clear

1

1

1

Main outcomes are clear

1

1

1

Characteristics of the patients are clear

0a

1

1

Confounders in each group clear

1

1

1

Main findings are clear

1

1

1

Estimates of the random variability

1

1

1

Losses to follow-up

0

0

1

P values reported

1

1

1

External validity

Representative selection process

0b

0b

0

Representative sample

0

1

0

Internal validity

Data dredging

1

1

1

Different lengths of follow-up

1

1

1

Statistical tests

1

1

1

Accurate main exposure measurement

0

1

0

Accurate outcome measurement

1

0

1

Confounding

All participants from the same population

1

1

1

Participants selected simultaneously

1

1

1

Adjustment for confounding

0

0

0

Losses

0

0

0

Power

Sample power calculation

0

0

0

Score

12c (16d)

14 (19)

14 (19)

  1. aThe cohorts were derived from three previously published prevention trials. The cohorts are described in the articles reporting the results of these three trials, but are not described in this article, which focused on predictors of eating disorders.
  2. bIn the article, no characteristic mentioned by the author made it possible to confirm the representativeness of the sample, although in the prevention trials from which the cohort was drawn, the author affirmed sample representativeness in terms of distribution by ethnicity and parental education level.
  3. cScore according to the adapted B & D scale: maximum 21.
  4. dAdjusted score according to the original B & D scale: maximum 28.