Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of the populations, design characteristics and main results of the selected studies

From: Systematic review of prospective studies assessing risk factors to predict anorexia nervosa onset

Authors

Year of pub

Country

Cohort size

Initial age

Follow-up period

Measuring risks factors tolls

ED Diagnoses tools

Results

Attrition bias

Statistical method

Retained risk factors

Association with AN onset

Cut-off calculation

Stice et al. [45]

2017

USA

257

12–16 years

Follow up at 2 and 8 years

Ideal-Body Stereotype Scale, Thinness expectancies scale, 5-item scale about denial of the cost of pursuing thin ideals, Weight Control Scale, Dutch Restrained Eating Scale, Negative Affect Scale-Revised, Studies-Depression Scale, Beck Depression inventory, Functional impairment measured with 17 items from the Social Adjustment Scale-Self Report for Youth, Frequency of visits to mental health care institutions, BMI

EDDI, DSM-5 criteria for eating disorders

Univariate, multivariate Cox analysis

 

Subthreshold/Threshold AN

No

Not taken into account

HR

p value

Functional impairment Body Mass Index

1.71

0.05

.0047

 < .0001

 

Threshold AN

HR

p-value

Negative affect

Functional impairment

Body Mass Index

2.06

2.17

0.16

.0144

.0292

.0201

Stice and Desjardins [46]

2018

USA

1272

Mean age 18 years

3 years

8-item Ideal-Body Stereotype Scale–Revised, 9-item Thinness Expectancy scale, 5 items scale about denial of cost of pursuing thin ideal, 9 items from the Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction with Body Parts Scale, 5-item Weight Control scale, Dutch Restrained Eating Scale, Negative Affect Scale Revised, Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale, Beck Depression Inventory, 17 items from the Social Adjustment Scale-Self Report for Youth, Frequency of visits to mental health care, BMI

EDDI, DSM-5 criteria for eating disorders

Multivariate analysis,

Classification tree

Low BMI

Participants in top 83% of BMI:

Incidence = 0.3%

Part. in bottom 17% BMI:

Incidence = 11.1%

No

Not taken into account

Interaction of low BMI/high body dissatisfaction

Part. in bottom 17% BMI and bottom 89% of body dissatisfaction:

Incidence = 9.0%

Part. in bottom 17% BMI and top 11% of body dissatisfaction:

Incidence = 71.4%

Overall classification rate = 0.982

Null tree classification rate = 0.979

F-index = 0.303

G-mean = 0.438

Tyrka et al [50]

2002

USA

1272

Mean age 18 years

3 years

SCID, EAT-26, SIQYA, Family Environment Scale

EDI, EAT 26, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R

Multivariate analysis,

Logistic regression

Perfectionism

BMI

T2

T3

No

Not taken into account

Unstandardized B Coeff. = .746; -.319

p-value ≤ .05

Unstandardized B Coeff = 1.314; -.817

p-value =  ≤ .05