Skip to main content

Table 2 Outcomes of FBT in 52 adolescent girls treated for AN

From: Effects of family-based treatment on adolescent outpatients treated for anorexia nervosa in the Eating Disorder Unit of Helsinki University Hospital

Parameter

Pretreatment

At EOT

Statistical significance of the change

%EBW, mean (SD)

83.08 (8.58)

98.65 (10.96)

t(df) = 13,310(51)*, p < 0.001, d = 1.58

Regular menses, n (%)

1 (1.9%)

28 (54.9%)

X2(df) = 24.083(1)**, p < 0.001, φ = 0.48

Obsessive exercise, n (%)

32 (62.7%)

0 (0%)

X2(df) = 28.033(1)**, p < 0.001, φ = 0.48

Regular meals, n (%)

5 (9.8%)

47 (90.4%)

X2(df) = 39.024(1)**, p < 0.001, φ = 0.48

Binge eating, n (%)

3 (5.9%)

1 (1.9%)

p = 0.63**

Special diets, n (%)

17 (32.7%)

7 (13.5%)

X2(df) = 8.100(1)**, p < 0.001, φ = 0.48

 

At the EOT

85% < EBW < 95%, n (%)

16 (30.8%)

EBW ≥ 95%, n (%)

32 (61.5%)

Benefited from the FBT (parents’ assessment), n (%)

45 (88.2%)

Benefited from the FBT (therapist’s assessment), n(%)

45 (88.2%)

No dietary restrictions, n (%)

40 (76.9%)

No appearance dissatisfaction, n (%)

39 (75%)

No fear of gaining weight, n (%)

41 (78.8%)

No body image distortion, n (%)

46 (88.5%)

No need for further treatment, n (%)

22 (42.3%)

  1. * Paired samples t-test; df = degree of freedom; Cohen’s d used to assess the Effect Size.**McNemar Chi-Square test, X2 = Chi Square, df = degree of freedom, sample size N = 52; Phi (φ) was used to assess the Effect Size