Skip to main content

Table 4 Summary of hierarchical regression models explaining ED severity and ED related psychological symptoms by parental RF with and without daughters' RF

From: The association between deficiencies in paternal and maternal reflective functioning and anorexia nervosa symptomatology

Predictors

EAT-26

IC

IPC

APC

OC

β

R2change

β

R2change

β

R2change

β

R2change

β

R2change

Step 1

 

10*

 

.17*

 

.17*

 

.18*

 

.06

M-RF

 − .18

 

 − .25†

 

 − .14

 

 − .29*

 

.02

 

P-RF

 − .17

 

 − .16

 

 − .31*

 

 − .19

 

 − .26†

 

Step 2

 

10*

 

.11*

 

.09*

 

.02

 

.00

M-RF

 − .08

 

 − .14

 

 − .05

 

 − .25

 

.04

 

P-RF

 − .05

 

 − .09

 

 − .20

 

 − .15

 

 − .25

 

D-RF

 − .37**

 

 − .39*

 

 − .34*

 

 − .15

 

 − .05

 

ΔR2

 

.15*

 

.24***

 

 .22**

 

 .16*

 

 .02

  1. D-RF daughters' Reflective-Functioning, M-RF maternal Reflective-Functioning, P-RF paternal Reflective-Functioning, EAT-26 Eating Attitude Test 26, EDI-3 Eating Disorder Inventory 3, IC Ineffectiveness Composite, IPC Interpersonal Problems Composite, APC Affective Problems Composite, OC Overcontrol Composite
  2. †p = .08; *p < .05; **p < .001
  3. aR2 in step 1, bR2 in step 2