Skip to main content

Table 2 Measures of interest as a function of adjunctive treatment group

From: Comparison of MI-oriented versus CBT-oriented adjunctive treatments: impacts on therapeutic alliance and patient engagement during hospital treatment for an eating disorder

Measure

Total sample (N = 65)

CBT-oriented group (n = 28)

MI-oriented group (n = 37)

WAI-SR

   

 Time 1 (n = 60)

M = 3.8, SD = 0.81

M = 3.72 SD = 0.79

M = 3.86 SD = 0.84

 Time 2 (n = 50)

M = 4.12 SD = 0.61

M = 4.27 SD = 0.54

M = 4.01 SD = 0.65

 Time 3 (n = 36)

M = 4.38 SD = 0.65

M = 4.33 SD = 0.88

M = 4.43 SD = 0.41

WAI bond

   

 Time 1 (n = 60)

M = 4.13 SD = 0.83

M = 4.07 SD = 0.78

M = 4.18 SD = 0.89

 Time 2 (n = 50)

M = 4.39 SD = 0.69

M = 4.52 SD = 0.58

M = 4.29 SD = 0.75

 Time 3 (n = 36)

M = 4.53 SD = 0.73

M = 4.39 SD = 0.97

M = 4.64 SD = 0.46

WAI task

   

 Time 1 (n = 60)

M = 3.54 SD = 0.95

M = 3.43 SD = 0.91

M = 3.65 SD = 0.98

 Time 2 (n = 50)

M = 3.58 SD = 0.83

M = 3.74 SD = 0.85

M = 3.47 SD = 0.80

 Time 3 (n = 36)

M = 4.04 SD = 0.85

M = 4.14 SD = 0.97

M = 3.96 SD = 0.75

WAI goals

   

 Time 1 (n = 59)

M = 3.70 SD = 1.09

M = 3.66 SD = 1.12

M = 3.73 SD = 1.09

 Time 2 (n = 50)

M = 4.38 SD = 0.68

M = 4.54 SD = 0.50

M = 4.27 SD = 0.77

 Time 3 (n = 36)

M hasis> = 4.58 x  SD = 0.66

M = 4.45 SD = 0.89

M = 4.69 SD = 0.39

Time reading manual

M = 1.69 SD = 0.93

M = 1.73 SD = 0.88

M = 1.66 SD = 0.97

Amount of manual read

M = 2.19 SD = 0.91

M = 2.23 SD = 0.87

M = 2.16 SD = 0.95

Treatment completion

 No

26 (40%)

11 (39%)

15 (41%)

 Yes

39 (60%)

17 (61%)

22 (59%)

  1. Percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number