Understanding eating disorder symptoms in same-gender couples: social environmental factors

Table 2 Multilevel models examining sociocultural and relationship factors predicting disordered eating among sexual minority men and women

	Eating attitudes		Cognitive restraint		Emotional eating		Uncontrolled eating
	B (SE)	pr	B (SE)	pr	B (SE)	pr	B (SE)	pr
Main effects *(Aim 2)*
ISA	2.05 (0.44)***	0.36	5.82 (1.30)***	0.35	5.00 (1.79)**	0.23	3.27 (1.28)*	0.21
Relationship quality	− 0.04 (0.04)	− 0.09	0.11 (0.11)	0.09	− 0.25 (0.14)	− 0.15	− 0.39 (0.10)***	− 0.30
Gender	− 0.68 (0.93)	− 0.06	5.10 (2.85)	0.15	− 3.42 (3.65)	− 0.08	− 3.89 (2.59)	− 0.13
BMI	0.25 (0.06)***	0.32	0.25 (0.18)	0.12	1.07 (0.25)***	0.34	0.48 (0.18)**	0.22
Interaction effects
ISA * Relationship quality (Aim 3)	0.01 (0.03)	0.02	− 0.09 (0.09)	− 0.08	− 0.13 (0.13)	− 0.08	− 0.10 (0.09)	− 0.09
ISA * Gender (Aim 4a)	0.90 (0.91)	0.08	2.22 (2.67)	0.07	3.42 (3.67)	0.06	− 1.55 (2.60)	− 0.05
Relationship quality * Gender (Aim 4b)	− 0.07 (0.07)	− 0.08	0.20 (0.21)	0.08	0.56 (0.29)	0.16	0.64 (0.20)**	0.26

Values that appear in bold reach the p < .05 threshold for statistical significance
All models reported controlled for BMI. Models with interaction terms also included main effects, which are not reported here. Models were run separately for each outcome within each aim (Aims 4a and 4b were run the in same model)
ISA internalization of sociocultural attitudes toward appearance, SE standard error, pr partial correlation
*p < 0.05. **p < 0.01. ***p < 0.001

ISSN: 2050-2974