Skip to main content

Table 6 Results of Bootstrap Regression of perceived maternal and paternal negative weight shape and eating comments, biological sex, adolescent stage, BMI percentile and K10 on the dependant variable eating disorder cognitions (EDEQ-WS) (N = 1994)

From: Exploring associations between positive and negative valanced parental comments about adolescents’ bodies and eating and eating problems: a community study

Variables

B

SE

Bias

BCa 95% CI B

LL

UL

p

BMI%ile

.11

.001

9.78

.009

.012

< .001

K10

.86

.004

6.35

.079

.094

< .001

Biological sex

.843

.057

.000

.728

.956

< .001

Adolescent stage

.032

.018

− .001

− .001

.062

.069

Mat Pos W/S

− .007

.026

− .001

− .061

.043

.765

Mat Neg W/S

.217

.040

.000

.137

.295

< .001

Mat Pos EAT

.025

.030

.000

− .031

.085

.391

Mat Neg EAT

.096

.031

.000

.039

.154

< .001

Pat Pos W/S

.010

.029

.001

− .051

.071

.735

Pat Neg W/S

.102

.045

.002

.009

.197

.023

Pat Pos EAT

− .005

.031

.002

− .065

.048

.903

Pat Neg EAT

− .029

.037

.000

− .100

.044

.432

  1. BMI%ile Body Mass Index (kg/m2) percentile, K10 Kessler 10-item scale, Mat Maternal, Pat Paternal, W/S Weight Shape Comments, EAT Eating comments, B Unstandardized coefficients, SE Standard Error, BCa Bootstrap for Coefficients based on 100 bootstrap samples, LL lower level, UL upper level, p significance