Skip to main content

Table 1 Cognitive behavior therapy trials for adolescent eating disorders

From: A systematic review of cognitive behavior therapy and dialectical behavior therapy for adolescent eating disorders

Authors (year)

Study design

Population

Therapy (n)

Attrition (%)

Tx length

FU

Summary of relevant findings

Quality appraisal

Dx(s)

Age M [range]

CBT (outpatient settings)

Ball and Mitchell (2004) [37]

RCT

AN

18.5 [13–23]

CBT (13) versus behavioral family therapy (12)

CBT: 30.8

Behavioral family therapy: 25

21–25 sessions over 12 mo

6 mo

No differences between treatment groups at EOT or FU in weight, return of menses, or ED psychopathology. At EOT, 77.8% (n = 7) of each treatment group achieved min. weight gain of 4 kg (8.8 lbs) and within 10% of adolescent’s average body weight, with binge and purge episodes occurring less than once per week. Improvements were maintained at FU. Statistically significant improvement in ED psychopathology and behavior (EDE, EDI-2, ABOS) for both treatment groups at EOT, but all measures remained in the symptomatic range at all FU timepoints. Of patients that completed either treatment (n = 18), 72% achieved min. weight gain of 4 kg (8.8 lbs) and within 10% of adolescent’s average body weight, return of menses, and abstinence from binge and purge episodes at 6mo FU

Faira

Byford et al. (2007) [34]

Secondary analysis of RCT data (Gowers et al., 2007; [82])

AN

14.9 [12–18]

CBT w/parent counseling, dietary therapy (55) versus multi-disciplinary inpatient treatment (57) versus general community care (55)

CBT: 25.5

Inpatient: 50.9

General community care: 30.9

CBT: 6 mo

Inpatient: 6 wks

General community care: 6 mo

1 yr 2 yr

The outpatient CBT group spent the least amount of time in the hospital compared to the other two treatment groups. There were no statistically significant differences in cost of treatment between the three treatment groups, though the CBT group was least expensive at non-significant level

Faira

Charpentier et al. (2003) [41]

Cohort study

AN

BN

17.7 [13–22]

Group CBT (26)

12

13 wks (≈ 3 mo)

3 mo

For patients with BN, statistically significant reduction in ED psychopathology (EDI) and frequency of binges and purging at EOT, which was maintained at 3mo FU. For patients with AN, statistically significant increase in BMI, with no significant changes in other ED symptoms (EDI)

Faira

Cibich and Wade (2019) [77]

Case study

BN

16 [N/A]

CBT-T (1)

N/A

10 sessions

3 mo

Abstinence from binge eating and purging by second session, and ED psychopathology (EDE-Q) within community norm range by EOT. All changes maintained at 3mo FU

Includeb

Cowdrey and Davis (2016) [78]

Case study

AN

15 [N/A]

CBT-E (1)

N/A

11 wks (≈ 3 mo)

8 mo

Marked reduction in ED behaviors and "feeling fat" (self-monitoring records), global ED psychopathology (EDE-Q) within community norms, and clinically significant increases in weight at EOT. At 8 mo, progress was partially maintained (global EDE-Q score had increased to just above clinical cut-off)

Includeb

Craig et al. (2019) [79]

Cohort study

AN, atypical AN, BN, atypical BN

15.5 [13–18]

CBT-ED (54)

38.9

Varied (M = 22 wks; range: [6–46 wks], or M ≈ 5 mo, range: [1–10 mo])

None

Statistically significant improvement in ED psychopathology (EDE-Q) at EOT (d = 0.82). For patients with AN or atypical AN, statistically significant increases in mean %EBW (AN: d = 0.61; atypical AN: d = 0.36)

Faira

Dalle Grave et al. (2013) [35]

Cohort study

AN

15.5 [13–17]

CBT-E (46)

17.4

40 wks (≈ 9 mo)

60 wk (≈ 14 mo)

Nearly two thirds (63%, n = 29) completed 40 sessions without need for additional treatment. Of treatment completers, 31% (n = 9) reached 95% EBW by EOT. Nearly all treatment responders (97%, n = 28) had global ED psychopathology (EDE-Q) within community norms at EOT. Changes remained stable at 60wk FU

Gooda

Dalle Grave et al. (2015) [48]

Cohort study

BN, BED, or other specified ED

16.5 [13–19]

CBT-E (68)

25

20 wks (≈ 5 mo)

None

Statistically significant improvements in ED psychopathology (EDE-Q) at EOT (d = 1.03). More than half (67.6%, n = 46) had minimal residual ED psychopathology (global EDE-Q scores below 1 SD above the community mean) at EOT. Of participants with binge eating or purging at BL, 50% (n = 25) were abstinent at EOT. Of treatment completers, 81.2% (n = 42) achieved minimal residual ED psychopathology at EOT, and 76.5% (n = 26) of those with binge eating or purging at BL were abstinent at EOT

Gooda

Dalle Grave et al. (2019) [31]

Cohort study

AN

15.5 [11–18]

CBT-E (49)

28.6

40 wks (≈ 9 mo)

20 wk (≈ 4 mo)

The majority of treatment completers (62.9%, n = 22) achieved both good weight outcome (corresponding to an adult BMI ≥ 18.5 kg/m2) and global ED psychopathology (EDE-Q) within community norms at EOT. Nearly half of patients that completed the 20wk FU (48.3%, n = 14) maintained this outcome

Gooda

DeBar et al. (2013) [30]

RCT

BED, BN

15.12 [12–18]

CBT (13) versus TAU (12)

23 (CBT)

30 (TAU)

8 wks + 4 optional wks (≈ 2–3 mo)

3 mo

6 mo

At FU, CBT held advantage over TAU, with statistically significant higher rates of abstinence from binge eating (at 6mo FU, d = 1.47), and more improvements in eating, shape and weight concerns (at 6mo FU, EDE Eating Concerns d = 0.80, EDE Shape Concerns d = 1.04, EDE Weight Concerns d = 0.64). 100% of CBT participants were abstinent from binge eating at 6mo FU. Participants in the CBT group reported high post-treatment satisfaction (Client Satisfaction Survey)

Faira

Gorrell et al. (2019) [80]

Secondary analysis of

RCT data (Le Grange et al., 2015; [44])

BN, BN-type EDNOS (DSM-IV)

15.8 [12–18]

FBT-BN (52) versus CBT-A (58)

10

Varied (FBT-BN,

M = 13.6 wks;

CBT-A, M = 14.7 wks) (both ≈ 3 mo)

none

Across both treatments, participants with a higher level of motivation to change in ED-related preoccupations and rituals (Motivation for Change subscale of YBC-EDS) at BL were more likely to have reduced ED psychopathology (EDE global score) at EOT. Motivation to change ED-related preoccupations and rituals at BL had no effect on abstinence from bingeing and purging at EOT in either treatment

Gooda

Gowers and Smyth (2004) [81]

Cohort study

AN

16.1 [12–20]

CBT + parental counseling + dietary therapy (42)

21.5

12 sessions CBT, 4 sessions parental counseling, 3 sessions dietary counseling

6 wk

At 6wk FU, significant improvements in ED psychopathology (EDI-2) and weight gain. Those with higher motivation (assessed using survey designed by research team) were more likely to complete treatment. Motivational status did not predict self-rated outcome (including EDI-2) at FU, though higher level of motivation at BL predicted more weight gain at 6wk FU

Faira

Gowers et al. (2007) [82]

RCT

AN

14.9 [12–18]

CBT w/parent counseling, dietary therapy (55) versus multi-disciplinary inpatient treatment (57) versus general community care (55)

CBT: 25.5

Inpatient: 50.9

General community care: 30.9

CBT: 6 mo

Inpatient: 6 wks

General community

care: 6 mo

1 yr

2 yr

At 1 yr FU, mean improvement in weight and ED psychopathology (EDI-2, MRAOS) across treatment groups, with no statistically significant differences between them. At 2 yr FU, further improvement in outcome for all groups, with no statistically significant differences between them

Faira

Gowers et al. (2010) [32]

Secondary analysis of

RCT data (Gowers et al., 2007; [82])

AN

14.9 [12–18]

CBT w/parent counseling, dietary therapy (55) versus multi-disciplinary inpatient treatment (57) versus general community care (55)

CBT: 25.5

Inpatient: 50.9

General community care: 30.9

CBT: 6 mo

Inpatient: 6 wks

General community

care: 6 mo

1 yr

2 yr

5 yr

At 5 yr FU, trend of improvement across treatment groups in ED outcome (MRAOS), and no statistically significant differences between groups in % weight for height, diagnostic outcome, or ED psychopathology (EDI-2, MRAOS). No significant differences in total cost of hospital use across treatment groups at 5 yr FU. No statistically significant differences between groups in parental expectations of treatment (at 1 yr FU, self-reported rating of prior expectation of treatment received on 7-point Likert scale), but adolescents’ expectations of general outpatient care were lower than of CBT outpatient care. At 1 yr FU, parents reported satisfaction across treatments (rated on 7-point Likert scale), but were significantly more satisfied with CBT outpatient care compared to general community care. Adolescents had significantly lower satisfaction with care across treatments compared to parents, though a non-significant trend favored adolescent satisfaction with CBT outpatient care compared to general community care

Faira

Hilbert et al. (2020) [47]

RCT

BED

15.3 [12–20]

CBT (32) vs WLC (36)

32

20 sessions over 4 mo

6 mo

12 mo

24 mo

Compared to WLC group, CBT group had significantly higher rates of abstinence from binge eating (51% vs. 33%) and remission from BED (57% vs. 33%) and significantly less ED psychopathology at EOT (EDE). CBT group maintained its advantage relative to WLC in in ED behaviors and psychopathology at all FU timepoints

Gooda

Hurst et al. (2017) [83]

Case study

BN

15 [15–15]

FBT-BN (1) versus FBT-BN + CBT (1)

0

Not reported

None

Participants in both treatments achieved full remission at EOT (EDE global score within 1 SD of community norms). Participant 1 reduced binge and purge episodes from an average of 12 per week at BL, to 100% abstinence at EOT. Participant 2 reduced binge and purge episodes from an average of ten per week at BL, to 100% abstinence at EOT

Includeb

Hurst and Zimmer-Gembeck (2019) [36]

Cohort study

AN

14.9 [12–17]

FBT + CBT-P (21)

9

Varied (M = 32 wks; 23 FBT sessions and 9 CBT sessions) (≈ 7 mo)

None

Over half (57%; n = 12) of adolescents achieved full remission by EOT, defined as a minimum of 95% of EBW and global EDE-Q score within community norms. Two participants demonstrated increased ED symptoms at EOT

Gooda

Jaite et al. (2018) [33]

RCT

AN

16.9 [12–21]

CBT (24) vs DBT (26)

Not reported

25 wks (wkly individual and group sessions) (≈6 mo)

None

ED symptoms (EDI-2) decreased and BMI increased significantly from BL to EOT in both treatments (CBT: EDI-2 d = -0.61, BMI d = 1.04; DBT: EDI-2 d = -0.55, BMI d = 0.7). Treatment assignment (CBT vs DBT) did not predict treatment satisfaction. Significant correlation between therapist and parent level of satisfaction of treatment (Questionnaire for the Evaluation of Treatment). Agreement was not observed between adolescent and therapist, nor adolescent and parent level of satisfaction in treatment

Faira

Le Grange et al. (2015) [44]

RCT

BN, BN-type

EDNOS (DSM-IV)

15.8 [12–18]

FBT-BN (52) versus CBT-A (58)

10

Varied (FBT-BN M = 13.6 wks; CBT-A M = 14.7 wks) (both ≈ 3 mo)

6 mo

12 mo

Abstinence from binge eating and purging was significantly higher in FBT-BN than CBT-A at EOT and 6mo FU. Abstinence from these behaviors was no longer significantly different between the groups at 12mo FU. No significant differences between groups in %EBW, EDE global score, YBC-EDS total score

Gooda

Le Grange et al. (2020) [49]

Cohort study

Any

DSM-5

ED diagnosis, excluding ARFID

14.6 [12–19]

FBT (51) versus CBT-E (46)

FBT: 35

CBT: 37

FBT: 20 sessions over 6 mo

CBT: 40 sessions over 9–12 mo for lower weight pts; 20 sessions over 6 mo for higher weight pts

6 mo

12 mo

Rate of weight gain was faster in FBT than CBT by EOT, though differences in weight gain were no longer significant at 6 and 12mo FUs. There were no differences in ED psychopathology (EDE global score) between the treatments at any time point

Gooda

Lock (2005) [43]

Cohort study

BN

15.8 [12–18]

CBT (34)

18

Varied (M = 15.8 sessions) (≈ 4mo)

None

Majority of patients (82%, n = 28) completed at least 10 weeks of treatment. The mean rate of binge eating and purging reduced from 15.8 episodes/wk (range: [2–21]) at BL to 3.4 episodes/wk (range: [0–21]) at EOT. Over half of participants (56%, n = 19) were abstinent from binge eating and purging at EOT

Faira

Matheson et al. (2020) [84]

Secondary analysis of RCT data (Le Grange et al., 2015; [44])

BN, BN-type

EDNOS (DSM-IV)

15.7 [12–18]

CBT-A (26) vs FBT-BN (30) vs SPT (15)

See Le Grange et al. (2015)

Varied (M = 14 sessions) (≈ 3 mo)

6 mo

12 mo

Reducing purge episodes by ≥ 96.8% by session 2 and reducing binge eating episodes by ≥ 96.4% by session 4 predicted abstinence in these behaviors at EOT, regardless of treatment type. Reducing binge eating episodes by ≥ 96.4% by session 8, and purge episodes by ≥ 94.4% by session 9 predicted abstinence at 6mo FU, and reductions in binge eating by ≥ 96.4% at session 9 predicted abstinence at 12mo FU, regardless of treatment type

Gooda

Ohmann et al. (2013) [85]

Cohort study

AN

14.3 [13–17]

Group CBT (29)

28

40 wkly group sessions + monthly family sessions (≈ 9 mo)

1 yr

Over half of patients (55%, n = 16) achieved good outcome, defined as reaching the 25th age-related BMI percentile, and absence of restriction or bulimic behaviors. At EOT, weight and BMI improved significantly in patients with good outcome and remained stable at 1 yr FU. There was little to no improvement in weight in patients with poor outcome or who dropped out of treatment (44.8%, n = 13). Patients who achieved good outcome also demonstrated statistically significant improvement in ED psychopathology, per EDE dietary restraint, eating concern and weight concern subscales, though improvements were not observed in the EDE shape concern subscale

Faira

Puls et al. (2019) [46]

Secondary analysis of RCT data (Hilbert et al., 2020; [47])

BED

14.17 [12–20]

CBT (64)

32

20 wkly sessions (≈ 5 mo)

None

High levels of therapist treatment adherence (ACF) and therapeutic alliance (WAI-OS) observed across all sessions. Decreased adherence was associated with higher patient treatment expectation (VAS rating of expectation of treatment success). No association was observed between treatment adherence and ED outcomes (# OBE and SBE episodes, EDE global score). Alliance was negatively associated with # OBE and SBE episodes, and positively associated with treatment adherence. There was no association between alliance and general ED psychopathology (EDE) or patient treatment expectation

Gooda

Schapman-Williams et al. (2006) [42]

Cohort study

BN, BN-type EDNOS

16.3 [range not reported]

CBT (7)

0

Varied (M = 15.3 sessions over 5.4 mo; range: [10–20 sessions over 4–8 mo])

None

At EOT, significant reduction in ED psychopathology (EDE), and mean # binge episodes/wk. Reduction in mean # purge episodes/wk approached statistical significance at EOT, and 57% (n = 4) were abstinent from both binge eating and purging

Faira

Schapman-Williams and Lock (2007) [86]

Case study

BN

16

CBT (1)

N/A

20 sessions (≈ 5 mo)

None

Consistent normalization of eating patterns by session six (assessed via daily food records). Abstinence from binge and purge episodes maintained throughout treatment, aside from one episode in week 13 (a reduction from > 20 binge and purge episodes/wk pre-treatment). Distress while eating reduced from 60% at session one to 0% by session nine. ED psychopathology (EDE) reduced substantially by mid-treatment, which was maintained at EOT

Includeb

Stefini et al. (2017) [39]

RCT

BN, BN-type EDNOS (DSM-IV)

18.7 [14–20]

CBT (39) versus PDT (42)

38.5 (CBT)

21.4 (PDT)

Varied (M = 36.6 sessions or ≈ 8 mo; up to 60 sessions over 1 yr)

12 mo

No significant differences in attrition, diagnostic changes or reduction in ED psychopathology at EOT or 12mo FU between groups. Significant reductions in binge and purge frequency, and ED symptoms (EDE, EDE-Q) in both groups at EOT, which were maintained at 12mo FU. CBT showed a small advantage over PDT in reduced frequency of binge eating (d = 0.23) and purging (d = 0.26) at EOT (EDE-Q), while PDT showed a small advantage over CBT in eating concern (d = -0.35) at EOT (EDE)

Faira

Sysko and Hildebrandt (2011) [87]

Case study

BN-type

EDNOS

16 [N/A]

CBT-E (1)

N/A

29 sessions over 9 mo

None

Clinically significant decrease in SBEs and purging in first 4 weeks. Abstinence from SBEs and purging achieved by session 22. Residual concerns around shape and weight still present at EOT

Includeb

Thompson-Brenner et al. (2010) [50]

Observational cross-sectional study

AN, BN, EDNOS

16.4 [15–18]

CBT, dynamic therapy, family intervention, emotion regulation, trauma therapy or conjoint therapy (120; n per treatment type not reported

N/A

Varied (M = 8 mo, range: [6 h–1 yr])

None

Dynamic therapy was most strongly associated with better global outcome for the entire sample, though CBT was most strongly associated with better outcome for a subsample of participants with poor relational/personality functioning (assessed via clinician rated psychotherapy effectiveness form)

Gooda

Valenzuela et al. (2018) [45]

Secondary analysis of RCT data (Le Grange et al., 2015; [44])

BN, BN-type

EDNOS (DSM-IV)

15.8 [12–18]

FBT-BN (52) versus CBT-A (58)

10

Varied (FBT-BN M = 13.6 wks; CBT-A M = 14.7 wks) or (both ≈ 3 mo)

6 mo

12 mo

Statistically significant and clinically meaningful reduction in symptoms of depression (BDI) and self-esteem (RSE) at FU in both treatments, with no statistically significant differences between them

Gooda

CBT guided self-help

Perkins et al.(2005) [54]

Secondary analysis of RCT data (Schmidt et al., 2007; [51])

BN, BN-type

EDNOS

17.9 [13–20]

CBT guided self-care or Family therapy adapted from FBT (85)

Not reported

Not reported

None

Both treatment groups included opportunities for parental involvement; for present analyses, total sample grouped into “No Parent Involvement” (n = 23) vs “Parent Involvement” (n = 62). Most common reasons participants reported choosing to exclude parents from treatment were lack of comfort discussing personal issues in their presence, feeling that the ED was “their problem” and parents didn’t need to be involved, or another personal factor unique to the adolescent (e.g., parents not thinking the adolescent had a problem). The most common reasons adolescents reported wanting parents to be involved in treatment included that the parent was viewed as supportive, had time for the patient, was interested in the patient and wanted to be involved, and the patient wanted them to learn more about the ED

Faira

Pretorius et al. (2009) [52]

Cohort study

BN, BN-type

EDNOS

18.8 [13–20]

Online CBT guided self-care (101)

17

8 web-based sessions, encouraged to complete wkly

3 mo

6 mo

Significant improvements in bulimic behaviors and cognitions at 3mo and 6mo FUs (EDE, EDE-Q) although most remained symptomatic; of treatment completers, 10% (n = 5) were abstinent from bulimic behaviors at 3mo FU, and 17% (n = 11) were abstinent from bulimic behaviors at 6mo FU. High patient satisfaction with treatment convenience, acceptability, and confidentiality (assessed via questionnaire designed by research team)

Gooda

Pretorius et al. (2010) [53]

Secondary analysis of cohort study data (Pretorius et al., 2009; [52])

BN, BN-type

EDNOS

M not reported; 16–19: n = 44; 20 years: N n = 7 [16–20]

Online CBT guided self-care (11)

N/A

8 web-based sessions. At time of interview, # sessions completed ranged from one to eight

None

Results included qualitative data regarding liked and disliked components of the web-based, guided self-care program. Participants found the layout and presentation of the program components to be user-friendly, and reported their choice of using a web-based program was influenced by accessibility, flexibility, sense of control over treatment, anonymity, non-judgmental nature, privacy, and convenience. Most participants felt that the program offered sufficient support, felt motivation to change at the start of treatment, motivation difficulties toward the end, and described improvement in ED symptoms that they attributed to the program

Gooda

Schmidt et al. (2007) [51]

RCT

BN, BN-type

EDNOS

17.7 [13–20]

CBT guided self-care (44) vs Family therapy adapted from FBT (41)

30

CBT: 22 sessions, Family therapy: 24 sessions (both ≈ 5 mo)

6 mo

12 mo

Both interventions demonstrated significant improvements in binge eating and purging behaviors (EATATE interview) across time. A significantly higher proportion of participants were abstinent from binge eating at 6mo FU in the CBT guided self-care group compared to the family therapy group. These differences were no longer significant at 12mo FU. There were no significant differences in change in purging behaviors between the two groups at 6mo or 12mo FU. Mean cost of treatment significantly lower for CBT guided self-care than family therapy (Client Service Receipt Inventory)

Faira

Wagner et al. (2013) [55]

RCT

BN

19.3 [16–21]

Online CBT-based guided self-help (18) versus guided self-help biblio-therapy (11)

31

Varied (M not reported; range: [4–7 mo])

4 mo

7 mo

18 mo

No differences in outcome between treatment groups; outcomes reported combines data from the two groups. Significant improvement over time in monthly binge eating, vomiting and fasting. At 7mo and 18mo FU, about half of adolescents (44%, n = 8 and 55%, n = 11, respectively) were abstinent from ED behaviors or achieved remission, with outcomes comparable to an adult sample receiving the same treatments. There were no significant improvements in the EDI-2 perfectionism scale, and asceticism EDI-2 subscale scores increased slightly between 4- and 7mo FU. All other EDI-2 subscales demonstrated improvement over time, with the highest decrease in scores within the first 4 mo of therapy

Poora

CBT-based inpatient care

Calugi and Dalle Grave (2019) [56]

Cohort study

AN

16.4 [13–18]

CBT-E (62)

9.7

20 wks (≈ 5 mo)

6 mo 12 mo

Significant mean reduction in body image concerns (EDE), and nearly all treatment completers (96.4%) reached a normative BMI percentile at EOT (corresponding to adult BMI ≥ 18.5 kg/m2). At 6mo and 12mo FU, 78.7% and 80.4% of treatment completers maintained a normative BMI, respectively

Gooda

Dalle Grave et al. (2014) [57]

Cohort study

AN

16.0 [13–17]

CBT-E (27)

3.7

20 wks (≈ 5 mo)

6 mo 12 mo

Treatment was well-accepted by patients, demonstrated by low attrition. Nearly all treatment completers (96.2%, n = 25) reached a normative BMI (corresponding to a BMI percentile ≥ 18.5) by EOT. Statistically significant decrease in ED psychopathology (EDE) by EOT, and 38.5% (n = 10) had minimal residual ED psychopathology (EDE global score below 1 SD above community norms). Changes were maintained at 6mo and 12mo FU

Gooda

Fennig et al. (2017) [58]

Cohort study

AN

14.8 [11–18]

Multimodal IP program, with CBT component (44)

29.5

Varied (M ≈ 4 mo, range [12 days–≈ 9 mo])

None

BMI significantly increased from admission to discharge, with 70% achieving 100% IBW at discharge, and 25% achieving 90% IBW. Significant improvement in general ED psychopathology severity (EDI-2 total score) and restraint and eating concern subscales, but no significant change in body dissatisfaction, weight concern, drive for thinness, or shape concern subscales

Faira

Naab et al. (2013) [59]

Cohort study

AN

16.4 [13–17]

Multimodal IP program, with CBT component (177)

30.5

Varied (M = 77.9 days) (≈ 3 mo

None

Significant mean increases in BMI and decrease in global ED psychopathology (SIAB-S global score) from admission to discharge. Compared to a sample of adults receiving the same treatment, differences in outcome were only found in the bulimic symptoms and atypical binge subscales of the SIAB-S, with adults showing greater severity at admission, and greater improvement upon discharge

Faira

Schlegl et al. (2016) [60]

Cohort study

AN

15.7 [13–17]

Multimodal IP program, with CBT component (238)

19.8

Varied (M = 81.9 days) (≈ 3 mo)

None

Significant increases in BMI from admission to discharge (d = 2.1), and improvement in ED psychopathology (EDI-2) at discharge (d = 0.8), with 44.7% demonstrating a clinically significant improvement, though 3.7% deteriorated

Gooda

  1. The quality appraisal tools are denoted with a superscript (aNIH Quality Assessment Tools and bJoanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Reports)
  2. ABOS = Anorectic Behavior Observation Scale; ACF = Adherence Control Form; AN = anorexia nervosa; ARFID = avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder; BDI = Beck Depression Inventory; BED = binge eating disorder; BL = baseline; BMI = body mass index; BN = bulimia nervosa; CBT = cognitive behavioral therapy; CBT-A = CBT adapted for adolescents; CBT-ED = CBT for eating disorders; CBT-E = Enhanced CBT; CBT-P = CBT Perfectionism modules; CBT-T = ten session CBT; DBT = dialectical behavior therapy; DSM = Diagnostic and Statistic Manual of Mental Disorders; Dx = Diagnosis; EBW = expected body weight; ED = eating disorder; EDE = Eating Disorder Examination; EDE-Q = Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire; EDI = Eating Disorder Inventory; EDNOS = eating disorder not otherwise specified; EOT = end of treatment; FBT = family-based treatment; FU = follow-up; IBW = ideal body weight; IP = inpatient; mo = month; MRAOS = Morgan Russell Average Outcome Scale; N/A = not applicable; OBE = objective binge episode; PDT = psychodynamic therapy; RCT = randomized controlled trial; RSE = Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale; SBE = subjective binge episode; SIAB-S = Structured Interview for Anorexic and Bulimic Syndromes; SPT = supportive psychotherapy; TAU = treatment as usual; Tx = treatment; VAS = visual analogue scale; WAI-OS = Working Alliance Inventory-shortened, observer-rated version; wk = week; WLC = wait list control; YBC-EDS = Yale-Brown-Cornell Eating Disorder Scale; yr = year
  3. Secondary analysis paper, using data from an original trial represented in the review