Skip to main content

Table 52 Inpatient and day treatment in combination for children and adolescents with anorexia nervosa

From: Canadian practice guidelines for the treatment of children and adolescents with eating disorders

Certainty assessment

Impact

Certainty

Importance

№ of studies

Study design

Risk of bias

Inconsistency

Indirectness

Imprecision

Other considerations

Weight Change (assessed with: Change in weight during treatment)

 5

Case Control and Case Series

very serious a

not serious

not serious

not serious

none

265 patients over 5 studies, all with AN. All studies treated patients as inpatients and then transferred to day treatment once medically stable. Details regarding the number of hours/days spent in day treatment not completely reported. Mean LOS were 3.9 months, 15.1 weeks and 7.9 weeks. Patients gained weight as described by BMI in 3 studies where BMI increase from 12.1 (SD1.1) to 18.6 (SD 0.42) in one study, 15.7 (SD1.2) to 18.0 (SD 1.0) in the second study and 15.19 (+/−  1.54) to 17.56 (+/−  1.07) in the third study. The second study also reported weight as %TGW which rose from 77.6% at admission to inpt to 88.5% at end of day treatment. In 2 studies weight change was described using BMI centiles and weight rose from a mean BMI centile of 2.7 (+/− 4.2) to 34.2 (+/− 15.7) in one study and 1.6 (+/− 5.1) to 49.4 (+/−  3.9) in the second study. 5/40 patients eligible for one study left treatment AMA and were not included in analysis.

VERY LOW

CRITICAL

Eating Disorder Inventory - 2 Score at discharge (assessed with: Rating Scale)

 1

Case Series

very serious a,b

not serious

not serious

not serious

none

35 patients completed inpt, day treatment and measures. Mean LOS 15.1 weeks. Change in ED1–2 total, drive for thinness and body dissatisfaction not significantly different between admission and discharge.

VERY LOW

IMPORTANT

Anorexia Nervosa Stages of Change Questionnaire (assessed with: Rating Scale)

 1

Case Series

very serious a,c

not serious

not serious

serious d

all plausible residual confounding would reduce the demonstrated effect

35 patients completed ANSOCQ at admission and d/c (ie after 15.1 weeks of inpatient + day treatment). Overall score increased a mean of 21.7 points which would signify moving from contemplation to preparation phases. Overall 29.4% (up from 0% at admission) of patients were classified as in “maintenance phase” and 26.5% (up from 15% at admission) in “action phase” at time of discharge.

VERY LOW

IMPORTANT

Overall Outcome (assessed with: Rating combining weight + compensatory symptoms)

 1

Case series

very serious a,e

not serious

not serious

not serious

all plausible residual confounding would reduce the demonstrated effect

One study which included 71 patients who completed 7.9 weeks of combined inpatient and DTP (33 days inpatient and 22 days DTP). At end of DTP 35.2% were deemed to have an excellent outcome (> 90% ideal BMI, maintaining weight and no use of compensatory symptoms in last week of program), 26.8% were deemed good outcome (85–90% ideal BMI, maintaining weight and no use of compensatory symptoms in last week of treatment), 14.1% deemed below average outcome (80–85% ideal BMI and maintaining weight OR > 85% ideal BMI, but losing 0.15–0.45 kg/week with no compensatory symptoms in the last week of treatment) and 23.9% were deemed to have a poor outcome (either < 80% ideal BMI OR < 85% ideal BMI and losing > 0.15 kg/week OR readmitted to inpatient unit OR use of compensatory symptoms in the last week of treatment).

VERY LOW

IMPORTANT

Eating Disorder Symptomatology (assessed with: Pre-post EDE-Q)

 1

Case series

very serious a

not serious

not serious

serious d

none

One study, including n = 26 adolescents. Patients received 13 weeks of inpatient treatment based on CBT-E model followed by 7 weeks of DTP. EDE scores decreased significantly pre-post for global and all subscales other than Shape Concern. Global EDE at admission 3.7 (+/− 1.3) to d/c 2.0 (+/− 1.1), % of patients with Global EDE < 1 SD above the community mean at admission 2% (+/− 7.7) and at d/c 10% (+/− 38.5). Dietary restraint at admission 4.1 (+/− 1.2) and at d/c 1.1 (+/− 1.0), Eating Concern (3.3 (+/− 1.4) and at d/c 1.5 (+/− 1.4), Shape Concern (3.8 (+/− 1.8) and at d/c 3.2 (+/− 1.4), Weight Concern at admission 3.5 (+/− 1.9) and at d/c 2.3 (+/− 1.4).

VERY LOW

IMPORTANT

Change in Frequency of Eating Disorder Symptoms (assessed with: Pre-post ED symptom frequency)

 1

Case series

very serious a

not serious

not serious

serious d

none

One study, including n = 26 adolescents. Patients received 13 weeks of inpatient treatment based on CBT-E model followed by 7 weeks of DTP. Binge eating was present in 8 patients (30%) at admission and only 2 patients (7.7%) at discharge. Median frequency of bingeing in previous 28 days was 17 (range 2–148) at admission and 8 (range 1–15) at discharge. Purging by vomiting was present at admission for 10 patients (28.5%) and at d/c for 4 patients (15.1%). Frequency of vomiting in previous 28 days was 25 (range 1–196) at admission and 10.5 (range 0–30) at dscharge. Laxative misuse was present for 3 patients at admission and none at discharge. Frequency of laxative abuse in previous 28 days was 1 (range 1–20) at admission and nil at d/c.

VERY LOW

CRITICAL

  1. Explanations
  2. aObservational study with no comparison/control
  3. bSelf-rating scale (EDI-2)
  4. cSelf-rating scale (ANSOCQ)
  5. dLower end of confidence interval overlaps with score that would signify no change
  6. eInformation on compensatory symptoms was taken only from clinician notes
  7. Bibliography:
  8. Case control - El Ghoch 2015 [250], Strober 2006 [248]
  9. Case series - Delle Grave 2014 [249], Hillen 2015 [251], Treat 2008 [200]