Skip to main content

Table 2 Simple mediation models examining the hypothesized model and an alternative model in EDs without OBE (n = 439) and EDs with OBE (n = 560), using standardized variables and 99% CI:s using 10,000 bootstrap samples. All models adjusted for age and BMI

From: Self-directed behaviors differentially explain associations between emotion dysregulation and eating disorder psychopathology in patients with or without objective binge-eating

Group

Path a

Path b

Total effect (c)

Indirect effect (ab)

99% CI

Direct effect (cÂŽ)

Model R2

Hypothesized direction (DERS Total - > SASB Affiliation - > EDE-Q Global)

 Non-OBE EDs

−.718***

−.631***

.451***

.453

.351–.564

−.002 (n.s.)

.414***

 OBE EDs

−.654***

−.479***

.417***

.313

.221–.419

.104*

.304***

Alternative direction (SASB Affiliation - > DERS Total - > EDE-Q Global)

 Non-OBE EDs

−.709***

−.002 (n.s.)

−.630***

.002

−.089–.095

−.631***

.414***

 OBE EDs

−.652***

.104*

−.547***

−.068

−.152–.013

−.479***

.304***

  1. BMI body mass index, DERS Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale, CI confidence interval, ED eating disorder; EDE-Q Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire, OBE objective binge-eating episode, SASB Structural Analysis of Social Behavior
  2. *p < .05; ***p < .001