Skip to main content

Table 4 Group comparisons

From: Orthorexic tendencies are linked with difficulties with emotion identification and regulation

 

ORTO-7CS

TAS Tot

TAS DIF

TAS DDF

TAS EOT

DERS Tot

DERS C

DERS G

DERS I

DERS NA

TAS Tot

−.15

1

        

TAS DIF

−.23*

.87*

1

       

TAS DDF

−.07

.86*

.66*

1

      

TAS EOT

−.02

.68*

.34*

.44*

1

     

DERS Tot

−.33*

.56*

.60*

.50*

.19

1

    

DERS C

−.18

.69*

.72*

.62*

.27*

.63*

1

   

DERS G

−.27*

.36*

.41*

.35*

.07

.89*

.46*

1

  

DERS I

−.33*

.52*

.55*

.44*

.22*

.87*

.53*

.73*

1

 

DERS NA

−.29*

.52*

.54*

.48*

.21*

.88*

.50*

.69*

.69*

1

DERS S

−.32*

.46*

.52*

.41*

.12

.95*

.49*

.84*

.77*

.80*

  1. Legend: Correlation table for all the TAS-20 subscales measuring alexithymia (Tot for the total score; DIF: difficulties identifying feelings; DDF: difficulties describing feelings; EOT: externally oriented thinking) and the DERS-16 subscales measuring emotion regulation difficulties (Tot: total score; C: lack of emotional clarity; G: difficulties engaging in goal-directed behaviours; I: impulse control difficulties; S: limited access to effective emotion regulation strategies; NA: non-acceptance of emotional response)
  2. Note: * for comparisons significant at the adjusted p < .005 level (for 11 correlations)
Back to article page

Journal of Eating Disorders

ISSN: 2050-2974