Skip to main content

Table 3 Relationship between starting on a high calorie nutritional rehabilitation protocol and inpatient outcomes: Change in %EBW, Change in Calories, Rate of Change in %EBW, Rate of Change in Calories, Length of Stay, Change in Weight, and Change in Heart Rate

From: Outcomes of an inpatient refeeding protocol in youth with anorexia nervosa: Rady Children’s Hospital San Diego/University of California, San Diego

 

Change in %EBW

Change in Calories (kcals)

Rate of Change in %EBW

Rate of Change in Calories (kcals)

Estimate (S.E.)

p-value

Estimate (S.E.)

p-value

Estimate (S.E.)

p-value

Estimate (S.E.)

p-value

Higher Calorie Refeeding Diet

−1.07 (1.04)

0.31

−526.5 (208.6)

0.01

0.01 (0.08)

0.88

−13.2 (12.4)

0.29

%EBW on admission

−0.22 (0.04)

<0.0001

−12.6 (8.9)

0.16

−0.01 (0.00)

0.03

1.7 (0.5)

0.002

Age

−0.14 (0.20)

0.49

86.8 (39.9)

0.03

−0.00 (0.02)

0.99

3.6 (2.4)

0.13

Race/Ethnicity

 Caucasian (reference)

0.0

 

0.0

 

0.0

 

0.0

 

 Latino

1.19 (1.36)

0.38

−47.2 (272.3)

0.86

0.11 (0.10)

0.29

4.2 (16.2)

0.80

 African American

−5.68 (4.08)

0.17

−1352.1 (815.1)

0.10

−0.28 (0.32)

0.38

−55.3 (48.6)

0.26

 Asian

3.02 (1.43)

0.04

−19.7 (287.3)

0.94

0.36 (0.11)

0.002

−23.2 (17.1)

0.18

 Mixed/Other

1.23 (1.47)

0.41

154.2 (294.8)

0.60

0.14 (0.11)

0.22

−12.3 (17.6)

0.49

Insurance Status (Public)

2.28 (1.03)

0.03

174.6 (207.0)

0.40

0.10 (0.08)

0.23

−26.8 (12.3)

0.03

Diagnosis

 Anorexia-restrict (reference)

0.0

 

0.0

 

0.0

 

0.0

 

 Anorexia-binge/purge

−0.26 (1.27)

0.84

−277.8 (254.9)

0.28

−0.09 (0.10)

0.43

−30.4 (15.2)

0.05

 Other Specified Eating Disorder

0.67 (1.85)

0.72

−337.3 (370.8)

0.37

0.05 (0.14)

0.72

0.3 (22.1)

0.99

 ARFID

−1.11 (1.38)

0.42

−198.0 (276.7)

0.48

−0.07 (0.11)

0.52

−36.9 (16.5)

0.03

NG/NJ tube

1.59 (1.20)

0.19

−171.2 (240.1)

0.48

0.01 (0.09)

0.89

−48.1 (14.3)

0.001

 

Length of Stay (days)

Change in Weight (kg)

Change in Heart Rate (bpm)

Estimate (S.E.)

p-value

Estimate (S.E.)

p-value

Estimate (S.E.)

p-value

Higher Calorie Refeeding Diet

−3.2 (2.3)

0.18

−0.52 (0.51)

0.32

−6.3 (2.9)

0.03

%EBW on admission

−0.4 (0.1)

<0.001

−0.09 (0.02)

<0.0001

−0.4 (0.1)

0.001

Age

0.4 (0.4)

0.35

0.15 (0.10)

0.12

−0.3 (0.5)

0.53

Race/Ethnicity

 Caucasian (reference)

0.0

 

0.0

 

0.0

 

 Latino

−0.5 (3.1)

0.86

0.66 (0.67)

0.33

0.6 (3.8)

0.87

 African American

6.3 (9.2)

0.50

−1.79 (2.01)

0.38

−1.4 (11.0)

0.90

 Asian

0.6 (3.2)

0.85

0.49 (0.71)

0.49

−5.4 (3.9)

0.16

 Mixed/Other

0.9 (3.3)

0.80

0.42 (0.73)

0.56

−1.1 (4.0)

0.78

Insurance Status (Public)

4.6 (2.3)

0.05

0.76 (0.51)

0.14

4.1 (2.8)

0.15

Diagnosis

 Anorexia-restrict (reference)

0.0

 

0.0

 

0.0

 

 Anorexia-binge/purge

1.2 (2.9)

0.67

−0.04 (0.63)

0.95

0.1 (3.5)

0.98

 Other Specified Eating Disorder

−1.0 (4.2)

0.82

−0.32 (0.91)

0.72

1.5 (5.0)

0.76

 ARFID

0.4 (3.1)

0.89

−0.54 (0.68)

0.43

1.0 (3.8)

0.80

NG/NJ tube

7.2 (2.7)

0.009

0.74 (0.59)

0.22

0.1 (3.3)

0.96

  1. Multivariable linear regression models were created to examine the relationship between starting on a high calorie nutritional rehabilitation protocol and several outcomes. All models controlled for age of patient, % expected body weight on admission, race/ethnicity, insurance status, diagnosis, and whether an NG/NJ tube was used during the admission. Adjusted estimates with standard errors and p-values are shown for each model