From: Test-retest reliability of the eating disorder examination-questionnaire (EDE-Q) in a college sample
Authors/study year | Study title | Sample | Test re-test time frame | Reliability statistics | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Luce & Crowther [5] | The Reliability of the Eating Disorder Examination--Self-Report Questionnaire Version | N = 139 female undergraduates at a large midwestern university | 14 days | Phi coefficient (items measuring key behavioral features of eating disorders) | Reliability of EDE-Q items measuring occurrence and frequency of behavioral features: |
18.5 years old on average (SD = 2.0) | |||||
-Occurrence (Phi coefficient) = Binge eating .62 Self-induced vomiting .66 | |||||
86% white, 8.4% African American, 2.0% Hispanic, 1.0% Native American, 2% other | |||||
Pearson r (test re-test reliability of items measuring frequency of behavioral features and EDE-Q subscales) | Laxative misuse .70 Diuretic misuse .57 | ||||
97% single, 2% married, 1% separated or divorced Avg. BMI = 22.5 (SD = 4.0) | -Frequency (Pearson r) = Binge eating .68 Self-induced vomiting .92 | ||||
Recruited through offering extra credit points toward research assignment in Introductory Psychology course; one additional extra credit point offered to participants willing to return for a second session (68% did) | |||||
Laxative misuse .65 Diuretic misuse = .54 -Cronbach’s alpha = | |||||
Cronbach’s alpha (internal consistency of subscales) | Restraint T1 .84/T2 .85 Shape Concern T1 .93/T2 .92 Weight concern T1 .89/T2 .89 | ||||
Eating concern T1 .78/T2 .81- test-retest reliability of EDE-Q subscales Pearson r: Restraint .81 Shape concern .94 Weight concern .92 Eating concern .87 | |||||
Mond, Hay et. al. [6] | Temporal Stability of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire | 802 women aged 18-45. Recruited in two phases: (1) selected at random from the national (Australia) electoral roll and sent an EDE-Q, self-report weight and height questionnaire and demographic form (2) Of those participants, all who completed the questionnaires, provided a phone number and indicated a willingness to be contacted by telephone at a later date were selected to participate in the second administration of the EDE-Q | 315 days | Kendall’s tau-b (frequency) | -Range of Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for individual subscales: |
Phi coefficient (occurrence) | |||||
-Eating Concern = .73 to Shape Concern = .87 | |||||
Cronbach’s alpha (internal consistency) | |||||
Global score = .93 | |||||
-Eating disorder behaviors occurrence/frequency test re-test correlations (Phi Coefficient and Kendall’s’ tau-b): | |||||
-Objective bulimic episodes: Occurrence (phi) .44 and Frequency (Kt-b) .44 | |||||
-Subjective bulimic episodes = Occurrence .24 and Frequency .28-Exercising for shape or weight = Occurrence .31 and Frequency .31 | |||||
Reas,Grilo, & Masheb [7] | Reliability of the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire in patients with binge eating disorder | N = 86 men and womenAvg. age = 23–59 (mean = 44.9, SD = 8.9) | Mean = 4.8 days Range = 1–14 days | Spearman’s rho (test retest reliability) | Overeating behaviors |
-OBEs = .84 | |||||
-SBEs = .51 | |||||
79.1% female, 20.9% male | -OOEs = .39 | ||||
82.6% Caucasian | Subscales | ||||
-Restraint = .77 | |||||
-Shape concern = .66 | |||||
66% married | -Weight concern = 71 | ||||
51.8% college graduates Mean BMI = 36.9 | -Eating concern = .72 | ||||
EDE-Q total score = .76 | |||||
Subscales at different time lag intervals | |||||
Participants recruited through print advertisements for treatment studies of BE at a university med school; pre-screening criteria included age 18–60, BMI > 27, likely BED diagnosis; exclusionary criteria included concurrent eating/weight/psychiatric treatment, medical conditions that influence weight | |||||
Overeating Behaviors:-OBEs = | |||||
.82 (0–1 days), .86 (2–14 days), .82 (7–14 days) | |||||
-SBEs = | |||||
.58 (0–1), .41 (2–14), .37 (7–14) | |||||
-OOEs = | |||||
.51 (0–1), .34 (2–14), .19 (7–14) | |||||
-Restraint = | |||||
.79 (0–1), .86 (2–14), .82 (7–14) | |||||
-Shape concern = | |||||
.79 (0–1), .75 (2–14), .66 (7–14)-Weight concern = | |||||
.76 (0–1), .70 (2–14), .71 (7–14) | |||||
-Eating concern = | |||||
.69 (0–1), .72 (2–14), .77 (7–14) | |||||
EDE-Q total score = | |||||
.79 (0–1), .74 (2–14), .72 (7–14) | |||||
Elder & Grilo [8] | The Spanish language version of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire: Comparison with the Spanish language version of the eating disorder examination and test-retest reliability | N = 77 Latina women (monolingual Spanish-speakers) recruited through print advertisements | Mean = 8.9 days (SD = 2.5, range = 5–14 days) | Spearman’s rho (test re-test reliability) | Subscales |
-Restraint: Spearman rho = .59 | |||||
-Eating concern: .81 | |||||
Avg. age 41.5 (sd = 13.6 -Mean BMI = 29.1 (sd = 5.9; range 19.8-43.0) | -Weight concern: .71 | ||||
-Shape concern: .81 | |||||
-Global score: .85 | |||||
Bardone-Cone & Boyd [9] | Psychometric Properties of the Eating Disorder instruments in Black and White young women: Internal consistency, temporal stability, and validity | N = 97 Black and N = 179 White female undergraduates. | Mean = 5.24 months | Cronbach’s alpha | Cronbach’s alpha range: .81 (Restraint) to .89 (Shape Concern) for Black women and .84 (Restraint and Weight Concern) to .91 (Shape Concern) for White women |
Pearson r (test retest reliability) | |||||
Oversampled for Black women. Recruited through introductory psychology classes and campus wide e-mail, flyers. Mean age black women = 19.0 (sd = 1.59); White women 18.6 (sd = 1.06) | |||||
Phi coefficient (occurrence) | |||||
Test-retest reliability | |||||
Black women: | |||||
Restraint = .57; Eating Concern = .79; Weight Concern = .81; Shape Concern = .82; | |||||
N = 70 Black women and N = 156 White women with data at Time 2 | |||||
OBE = .57; SBE = .19; Exercise = .31 | |||||
Test-retest reliability | |||||
White women: | |||||
Restraint = .71; Eating Concern = .81; Weight Concern = .81; Shape Concern = .80 OBE = .53; SBE = .40; Exercise = .39 | |||||
Becker et al. [10] | Validity and Reliability of a Fijian Translation and Adaptation of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire | N = 523 school-going adolescent Fijian females | Approximately 1 week | Intraclass correlation coefficient (subscales) | -ICC (English) = .79 (global); .75 (restraint) .55; (eating concern), .70 (shape concern), .78 (weight concern) -ICC (Fijian) .70 (global), .60 (restraint), .50 (eatingconcern), .63 (shape concern), .56 (weight concern |
N = 81 subjects who re-took the EDE-Q within ~1 wk; 21 retook EDE-Q in English, 60 in Fijian | |||||
Ages 15–20 from 12 secondary schools registered in one administrative sector in the Fiji Ministry of Education as of October 2006 | |||||
-Kappa (English) .81 (any purging), .39 (vomiting), .48 | |||||
(laxative misuse), .51 (herbal purgative use), .53 (driven exercise), .68 (fasting), .55 (binge eating) | |||||
-Kappa (Fijian) = .62 (any purging), .66 (vomiting), .13 | |||||
(laxative misuse), .63 (herbal purgative use), .46 (driven exercise), .61 (fasting), .60 (binge eating) | |||||
Kappa (behaviors) | |||||
Ro, Reas, & Lask [11] | Norms for the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire among female university students in Norway | N = 671 women | -Mean = 8.3 days -SD = 2.8 days | Spearman’s rho (test retest reliability) | -Spearman rho = .93 (global EDE-Q score) |
Ages 18–66 (mean = 24.8, SD = 6.9) | |||||
.90 (restraint) | |||||
.82 (eating concern) | |||||
.91 (shape concern) | |||||
.86 (weight concern) | |||||
.83 OBEs | |||||
.73 (self-induced vomiting) | |||||
.81 (laxative misuse) | |||||
.71 (excessive exercise) | |||||
Self-reported avg. BMI was 22.3, SD =3.4 (range = 11.9-45.0) | |||||
Cronbach’s alpha (internal consistency) | |||||
61% unmarried and 29% cohabiting or unmarried | |||||
10.1% of students had immigrated to Norway and 37% originally from country outside of Europe | |||||
Recruited from five different departments in two university settings in Norway; given lottery ticket as compensation | |||||
-Cronbach’s alpha = .94 (global) | |||||
.75 (restraint) | |||||
.78 (eating concern) | |||||
.90 (shape concern) | |||||
.81 (weight concern) | |||||
Yucel et al. [12] | The Turkish version of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire: Reliability and validity in adolescents | N = 925 primary and high school students 626 girls and 299 boys | -15 days or less | (test retest reliability) | -Pearson r = .91 (global score) |
Cronbach’s alpha (internal consistency) | |||||
Mean age = 15.52 years (SD = 1.88, range = 12-18) | .43 (binge eating) | ||||
(mean not specified) | .89 (weight concern | ||||
Test retest reliability carried out on 52 girls and 26 boys | |||||
.79 (restraint) | |||||
.83 (eating concern) | |||||
.89 (shape concern) | |||||
Pliatskidou et al. [13] | Reliability of the Greek version of the eating disorder examination questionnaire (EDE-Q) in a sample of adolescent students | N = 257 secondary school students 133 girls, 124 boys | Mean = 34 days | -Intraclass and Pearson r | -Cronbach’s alpha range .71 - .91 |
(test-retest reliability for subscales and global score) | -Intraclass correlation coefficients = range .55 - .70 | ||||
Avg age = 16.1 (sd = 1.4) | -Pearson r range .58 - .73 | ||||
-Kendall’s tau-b (behavioral features) | -Kendall’s tau-b range .22 - .57 |