Table 1 Papers meeting the inclusion criteria
From: A review of feeding methods used in the treatment of anorexia nervosa
Author | Study design | Method | Sample size | Age (years) | Admission BMI (kg/m2) | Discharge BMI (kg/m2) | Change in weight (kg) | Length of stay (days) | Prescribed energy intake (kCal) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N = 26 | n = 26 | n = 37 | n = 37 | n = 31 | n = 31 | n = 24 | n = 31 | n = 27 | n = 16 |
Castro-Fornieles, [10] | Observational | Food | 49 | 14.4 | 15.5 | 18.4 | 8.7 | 29.8 | - |
Castro, [17] | Observational | Food | 101 | 14.9 | 15.9 | - | 6.3 | 31.2 | - |
Courterier, [18] | Chart review | NG + food | 12 | 15.7 | - | - | 5.5 | 78.0 | - |
Dalle Grave, [19] | Chart review | Food | 35 | 22.3 | 12.6 | - | 10.1 | 92.4 | - |
Diamanti, [8] | Chart review | PN + food | 104 | 14.9 | 14.3 | 15.6 | 3.1 | 30.7 | 2175 |
Food | 94 | 15.2 | 16.0 | 16.3 | 1.2 | 15.6 | 2078 | ||
Garber, [20] | Observational | SUP + food | 35 | 16.2 | 16.3 | - | 2.4 | 16.7 | 2668 |
Gentile, [21] | Observational | NG + food | 33 | 22.8 | 11.3 | 13.5 | 5.4 | - | 1736 |
Gentile, [22] | Chart review | NG + food | 75 | 16.8 | 12.6 | 18.3 | 14.9 | - | - |
Hart, [23] | Observational | SUP + food | 96 | - | 15.1 | 16.9 | 4.2 | 48.7 | 2520 |
Food | 318 | - | 16.6 | 17.8 | 3.3 | 38.0 | 1980 | ||
Imbierowicz, [7] | Chart review | SUP + food | 42 | 24.8 | 15.2 | - | 5.2 | 72.8 | - |
Food | 42 | 23.7 | 15.3 | - | 3.5 | 82.6 | - | ||
Krahn, [24] | Observational | Food | 10 | - | 15.4 | 19.4 | 10.4 | - | 3600 |
Lay, [25] | Chart review | Food | 40 | 15.2 | 13.6 | 17.2 | 9.4 | 141.0 | - |
Lund, [26] | Prospective | NG + food | 79 | 21.6 | 16.3 | 20.8 | 12.2 | 103.4 | - |
Neiderman, [27] | Survey | NG + food | 19 | 13.6 | 15.4 | 17.5 | - | - | - |
Okamoto, [28] | Observational | SUP + food | 21 | 20.5 | 13.5 | 16.7 | - | 108.9 | - |
Food 1 | 7 | 18.4 | 12.9 | 15.7 | - | 149.0 | - | ||
Food 2 | 7 | 18.2 | 14.5 | 16.0 | - | 70.4 | - | ||
Ornstein, [29] | Chart review | NG + food | 69 | 15.5 | 15.0 | 16.9 | 4.9 | 25.6 | - |
Ostuzzi, [30] | Observational | SUP + food | 53 | 24.7 | - | - | 6.2 | 101.9 | - |
Pertushuk, [31] | Chart review | PN + food | 23 | 25.4 | - | - | 2.5 | 62.6 | - |
Food | 136 | 23.8 | - | - | 1.1 | 29.6 | - | ||
Rigaud, [32] | RCT | NG + food | 19 | - | 15.8 | 17.4 | - | - | 1832 |
Food | 17 | - | 16.2 | 16.6 | - | - | 1642 | ||
Rigaud, [9] | RCT | NG + food | 41 | 22.5 | 12.1 | 17.9 | 9.6 | - | - |
Food | 40 | 24.2 | 12.8 | 15.9 | 5.0 | - | - | ||
Robb, [33] | Chart review | NG + food | 52 | 14.8 | 15.5 | 17.5 | 5.4 | 22.3 | 3255 |
Food | 48 | 15.0 | 16.0 | 16.8 | 2.4 | 22.1 | 2508 | ||
Silber, [34] | Chart review | NG + food | 6 | 13.8 | 15.3 | 19.1 | 10.9 | 36.0 | 4350 |
Food | 8 | 14.9 | 17.4 | 18.5 | 3.8 | 39.9 | 3400 | ||
Stordy, [35] | Observational | Food | 11 | 19.9 | - | - | 12.8 | - | 2800 |
Tonoike, [36] | Chart review | PN + food | 46 | 21.0 | 12.7 | 17.2 | 11.1 | 63.5 | - |
Walker, [37] | Observational | SUP + food | 29 | - | - | - | 8.4 | - | - |
Zeurcher, [38] | Chart review | NG + food | 155 | 25.7 | 14.2 | - | 8.1 | 61.0 | 3035 |
| Â | Â | Food | 226 | 25.2 | 15.7 | - | 5.7 | 48.3 | 2815 |