Author | Objective | Location | Sample | Study design | Key findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wales et al. [49] | To assess the relative importance of qualitative statements about the transition from CAMHS to AMHS for EDs | BEAT, First Steps, Eating Disorders and Carers UK, United Kingdom | Patients, caregivers, providers (n = 28) | Prospective cross-sectional study, using a Q-methodology sort task, with a normal distribution pattern scale | Important factors: involving parents and caregivers in the transition process, facilitating effective transitions between services, supporting patients through transitions, and ensuring timely, patient-centered care |
Winston et al. [51] | To establish how well recommendations for managing transitions from CAMHS to AMHS for EDs are being met | RCPsych National Training Days, England | Service teams (n = 38) | Prospective cross-sectional survey of CEDS-CYP teams, based on RCPsych guidance for ED transitions | Most teams compliant in providing transition protocols (52.6%), individual transition plans (78.9%), joint care with adult services (89.5%), and support to families (73.7%); yet few referred ED patients to specialist AMHS (15.8%) |