Skip to main content
Fig. 5 | Journal of Eating Disorders

Fig. 5

From: How evaluative pairings improve body dissatisfaction in adult women: evidence from a randomized-controlled online study

Fig. 5

Johnson–Neyman Significance Regions for the Conditional Effects of Contingency Learning on State Body Dissatisfaction at Different Values of the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire short version (EDE-Q8). The effect is significant at EDE-Q8 values above the dotted, vertical line. LL = lower level, UL = upper level, CI = confidence interval

Back to article page

Journal of Eating Disorders

ISSN: 2050-2974