Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of the ANOVAS

From: Functionality appreciation is associated with improvements in positive and negative body image in patients with an eating disorder and following recovery

Variable

df

f

p

ηp2

Appearance Evaluation

FAS

1, 498

42.464

 < .001

.08

Group

2, 498

33.425

 < .001

.12

FAS:Group

2, 498

13.850

 < .001

.05

Appearance Orientation

FAS

1, 498

10.130

.002

.02

Group

2, 498

7.192

 < .001

.03

FAS:Group

2, 498

0.186

.830

.00

Overweight Preoccupation

FAS

1, 498

49.64

 < .001

.09

Group

2, 498

59.44

 < .001

.19

FAS:Group

2, 498

4.95

.007

.02

Body area Satisfaction

FAS

1, 498

148.578

 < .001

.23

Group

2, 498

48.539

 < .001

.16

FAS:Group

2, 498

3.534

.030

.01

Body Appreciation Scale-2

FAS

1, 498

309.808

 < .001

.38

Group

2, 498

101.327

 < .001

.29

FAS:Group

2, 498

10.121

 < .001

.04

  1. FAS = Functionality Appreciation Scale [21]