Childhood hyperactivity, eating behaviours, and executive functions: Their association with the development of eating-disorder symptoms in adolescence

Table 1 Results from the Measurement Invariance Models

Model	χ² (df)	CFI	TLI	RMSEA	90% CI	CM	ΔCFI	ΔTLI	ΔRMSEA	Δχ² (df)
Measurement models
1. Total/configural	562.107 (368)*	0.973	0.966	0.019	0.016; 0.022	–	–	–	–	–
2. Strong	600.847 (337)*	0.969	0.963	0.020	0.017; 0.022	1	− 0.004	− 0.003	+ 0.001	37.401 (9)*
3. Strict	995.875 (352)*	0.925	0.914	0.030	0.028; 0.032	2	− 0.044	− 0.049	+ 0.010	382.381 (15)*
3a. Partial strict	683.375 (351)*	0.961	0.955	0.022	0.019; 0.024	2	− 0.008	− 0.008	+ 0.002	83.117 (14)*
4. Latent variance	718.804 (354)*	0.958	0.951	0.023	0.020; 0.025	3a	− 0.003	− 0.004	+ 0.001	27.705 (3)*
5. Latent means	1035.677 (357)*	0.921	0.910	0.031	0.029; 0.033	4	− 0.037	− 0.041	+ 0.008	325.984 (3)*
Latent curve models
L1. Linear	542.205 (162)*	0.911	0.896	0.038	0.034; 0.041	–	–	–	–	–
L2. Quadratic	361.787 (158)*	0.953	0.943	0.028	0.024; 0.032	L1	+ 0.042	+ 0.047	− 0.010	136.390 (4)*
Predictive latent curve models
P1. Full Med	779.885 (404)*	0.957	0.950	0.022	0.019; 0.024	–	–	–	–	–
P2. Partial Med	777.268 (401)*	0.957	0.950	0.022	0.019; 0.024	P1	0.000	0.000	0.000	6.314 (3)

^* p ≤ .01; χ² = chi-square test of exact fit; df = degrees of freedom; CFI = comparative fit index; TLI = Tucker-Lewis index; RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation; 90% CI: 90% confidence interval for the RMSEA; CM = comparison model; Δ = change in model fit relative to the CM

ISSN: 2050-2974