Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparing ED males versus HC males, and ED males versus ED females

From: What about males? Exploring sex differences in the relationship between emotion difficulties and eating disorders

 

Part 1:

Part 2:

ED males versus HC males

ED males versus ED females

F

p

η2

F

p

η2

TAS

DIF

96.5

< .001*

.13

4.3

.039

.02

8.5

.004*

.01

1.2

.278

.04

DDF

58.3

< .001*

.09

4.9

.027

.02

2.7

.103

.00

1.9

.172

.01

EOT

39.7

< .001*

.06

18.9

< .001*

.06

5.3

.021

.01

16.1

< .001*

.05

DERS

Strategies

111.6

< .001*

.15

10.4

.001*

.04

19.6

< .001*

.03

6.3

.012

.02

Non-acceptance

80.5

< .001*

.11

2.4

.119

.01

8.5

.004*

.01

0.5

.501

.00

Impulse

132.5

< .001*

.17

10.4

.001*

.03

39.4

< .001*

.06

6.5

.011

.02

Goals

29.7

< .001*

.04

1.2

.272

.00

0.1

.826

.00

0.1

.771

.00

Awareness

4.1

.043

.01

0.00

.985

.00

0.4

.526

.00

0.0

.834

.00

Clarity

73.8

< .001*

.11

3.7

.056

.01

7.5

.006

.01

1.2

.279

.00

ERQ

Reappraisal

6.3

.013

.01

8.9

.003*

.03

0.1

.704

.00

10.0

.002*

.03

Suppression

8.3

.004*

.01

11.9

< .001*

.04

0.6

.429

.00

8.7

.003*

.03

  1. Group differences between ED males and HC males (left, Part 1) and between ED males and ED females (right, Part 2) on the three subscales of the TAS, six subscales of the DERS, and two subscales of the ERQ, also controlling for severity and length of illness (Part 2 only). The first row reports the results without controlling for general distress, the second row in italics reports results when controlling for it. *p values significant after Bonferroni correction
Back to article page

Journal of Eating Disorders

ISSN: 2050-2974