Skip to main content

Table 4 Hierarchical Regression Analysis Predicting body appreciation

From: Hiking, indoor biking, and body liking: a cross-sectional study examining the link between physical activity arenas and adults’ body appreciation

  

B

Std. E

ß

p

R2

Step 1

(Constant)

3.11

0.13

 

< 0.001

0.06*

 

Age

0.01

0.00

0.24

< 0.001

 
 

Gender

0.09

0.09

0.06

0.285

 

Step 2

(Constant)

1.47

0.19

 

< 0.001

0.30*

 

Age

0.00

0.00

0.06

0.206

 
 

Gender

0.07

0.07

0.04

0.367

 
 

SCS

0.04

0.00

0.53

< 0.001

 
 

CNS

0.13

0.04

0.13

0.004

 

Step 3

(Constant)

1.19

0.20

 

< 0.001

0.03*

 

Age

0.00

0.00

0.06

0.224

 
 

Gender

0.08

0.07

0.05

0.257

 
 

SCS

0.04

0.00

0.51

< 0.001

 
 

CNS

0.12

0.05

0.12

0.007

 
 

PA h/week

0.00

0.01

0.02

0.622

 
 

Fitness centers

0.04

0.02

0.11

0.010

 
 

Nature

0.05

0.02

0.10

0.049

 
  1. B Unstandardized beta coefficient; Std. E Standard error; ß Standardized beta coefficients; R2 R square change; BAS-2 Body appreciation scale-2; CNS Connectedness with nature scale; SCS Self-compassion scale, short-form. Fitness center = frequency in which fitness center is used to be physically active. Nature = frequency in which the nature is used to be physically active. *Correlations are set as statistically significant at a p-value of ≤ 0.05. Statistically significant p values are presented in bold