Skip to main content

Table 2 Effect of cue valence, group and cue valence x group in ANCOVA models for autobiographical memory and episodic future thinking outcomes

From: Difficulties in retrieving specific details of autobiographical memories and imagining positive future events in individuals with acute but not remitted anorexia nervosa

 

Valence

Group

Valence × Group

F-value (df = 2,232)

p value (Cohen’s d)

F-value (df = 2,116)

p value (Cohen’s d)

F-value (df = 4,232)

p value (Cohen’s d)

Autobiographical memory task

Specificitya

0.62

0.542 (0.14)

3.59

0.031* (0.50)

1.68

0.155 (0.34)

Detailednessb

0.12

0.890 (0.06)

2.08

0.129 (0.38)

1.65

0.163 (0.34)

Difficulty to rememberb

0.33

0.720 (0.11)

4.55

0.013* (0.56)

1.94

0.104 (0.36)

Realisticb

0.65

0.524 (0.16)

1.91

0.153 (0.36)

1.09

0.360 (0.28)

Positivityb

4.48

0.012* (0.39)

6.44

0.002** (0.67)

2.02

0.093 (0.38)

Vividnessb

2.42

0.091 (0.29)

1.84

0.163 (0.36)

2.54

0.040* (0.42)

Episodic future thinking task

Specificitya

0.12

0.886 (0.06)

0.57

0.568 (0.20)

0.61

0.656 (0.20)

Detailednessb

0.08

0.926 (0.06)

0.73

0.485 (0.22)

2.38

0.053 (0.40)

Difficulty to imagineb

0.46

0.634 (0.13)

2.66

0.075 (0.43)

1.91

0.110 (0.36)

Realisticb

2.61

0.076 (0.30)

1.65

0.196 (0.34)

2.00

0.095 (0.37)

Positivityb

1.89

0.154 (0.26)

6.57

0.002** (0.67)

3.33

0.011** (0.48)

Vividnessb

0.64

0.478 (0.16)

2.14

0.123 (0.39)

0.95

0.413 (0.26)

  1. **Significant at p < 0.01, *significant at p < 0.05. All analyses were run with age and years of education as covariates
  2. aExperimenter rated, bParticipant rated