Skip to main content

Table 5 Proportions of latent subgroups by diagnosis

From: Adverse childhood experiences among adults with eating disorders: comparison to a nationally representative sample and identification of trauma profiles

Class Name, N (%)

AN-R‡ N (%)

AN-BP N (%)

BN N (%)

ARFID N (%)

BED N (%)

OSFED N (%)

“Low ACEs” † 503 (47%)

145† (52%)

147† (49%)

62† (46%)

68† (46%)

29† (37%)

52† (41%)

“Household ACEs” 347 (33%)

81‡ (29%)

99 (33%)

47 (35%)

48 (33%)

24 (31%)

48 (38%)

“Abuse ACEs” 99 (9%)

25‡ (9%)

20 (7%)

10 (7%)

17 (12%)

14 (18%)

13 (10%)

“All ACEs” 112 (10%)

27‡ (10%)

32 (11%)

15 (11%)

13 (9%)

11 (14%)

14 (11%)

  1. †Reference group of “Low ACEs” latent subgroup in categorical outcome of the multinomial logistic regression. ‡Reference group of patients with AN-R in the categorical predictor of the multinomial logistic regression. Bolded numbers represent a significant increase in the risk ratio of being in the identified latent subgroup row (vs. the “Low ACEs” subgroup) for patients with the identified diagnosis column (vs. patients with AN-R)—a comparison across four total prevalence rates. No inferential comparisons have been made between any two prevalence rates. Latent subgroup row percentages add up to 100% down each diagnosis column. Analysis was multinomial logistic regression
Back to article page

Journal of Eating Disorders

ISSN: 2050-2974