Skip to main content

Table 3 Differences in symptomatology in function of the relationship status, sex and sexual orientation

From: Sexual attraction to men as a risk factor for eating disorders: the role of mating expectancies and drive for thinness

Symptomatology

Open to a relationship

Not open to a relationship

Differences between relationship status groups

N

Mean

SD

N

Mean

SD

F

dF

p value†

d

Gay men

 Drive for thinness

 

12.67

6.61

 

1.93

3.22

65.66

(1, 74)

< 0.001

1.92

 Body dissatisfaction

48

5.15

5.89

29

1.86

3.09

7.78

(1, 74)

0.021

0.65

 Bulimia

 

1.29

1.74

 

1.55

3.13

0.23

(1, 74)

1.00

− 0.11

Heterosexual men

 Drive for thinness

 

1.34

2.94

 

2.93

3.91

3.26

(1, 90)

0.222

− 0.46

 Body dissatisfaction

47

1.19

1.91

46

2.63

4.16

2.58

(1, 90)

0.336

− 0.44

 Bulimia

 

1.26

2.50

 

2.13

2.96

1.25

(1, 90)

0.801

− 0.32

Heterosexual women

 Drive for thinness

 

6.69

5.89

 

5.90

5.93

0.45

(1, 156)

1.00

0.13

 Body dissatisfaction

51

6.90

6.00

108

6.13

5.92

0.27

(1, 156)

1.00

0.13

 Bulimia

 

2.82

3.84

 

2.19

3.13

1.18

(1, 156)

0.837

0.19

Lesbian women

 Drive for thinness

 

1.95

4.18

 

3.29

4.34

1.79

(1, 66)

0.558

− 0.31

 Body dissatisfaction

41

1.10

2.44

28

4.64

6.67

9.44

(1, 66)

0.009

− 0.76

 Bulimia

 

0.34

0.94

 

0.82

2.02

1.61

(1, 66)

0.624

− 0.32

  1. †p values are adjusted for three comparisons by Bonferroni correction