Study characteristics | Study purpose | Participant characteristics | Measurement | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|
Wang et al. 48 Case–control | Compare the brain dopamine responses to food stimuli between binge eaters and non-binge eaters | 10 BED patients (8 female, 2 male; age: 38.5 ± 13.3; BMI: 43.4 ± 13.5) 8 obese controls (five female, 3 male; age: 41.8 ± 8.9; BMI: 36.5 ± 9.4) Exclusion: history of medical treatment for weight control, alcohol or drug abuse, neurological or psychiatric disorder, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, head trauma | PET and [11C]raclopride PET scanning was conducted in different conditions: placebo and methylphenidate under food intervention (view, smell, taste) or neutral intervention (pictures, toys, and clothing items) | Binge eaters had significantly more dopamine release than non-binge eater in caudate after methylphenidate under food intervention. However, the differences in putamen or in ventral striatum were not significant The increases of dopamine release across all subjects in caudate were correlated with binge eating severity |
Nasser et al. 78 Cross-sectional | Assess dopamine response to oral food stimulation using electroretinographic Correlate dopamine response under placebo, methylphenidate and food stimuli with Binge Eating Scale and the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire | 9 healthy, eating disorder-free adults (5 female, 4 male; age: 39 ± 10; BMI: 32 ± 5) Exclusion: diabetes, thyroid or renal disease, neurological disorders, Tourette’s syndrome, schizophrenia, bipolar disease, current major or situational depression, current or history of anorexia nervosa or bulimia nervosa, current use of any prescription medication, pregnancy, use of tobacco products or recreational drugs | Dopamine responses were assessed under four conditions: placebo (water), 10 mg methylpheidate, 20 mg methylphenidate, food stimulus | A significant increase in b-wave amplitude in response to the 20 mg methylphenidate dose and food stimuli Significant correlations between b-wave amplitude under the food stimulus condition and the Binge Eating Scale score |
Davis et al. 58 Case–control | Compared five polymorphisms known to influence the function of the striatal dopamine D2 receptor between BED and controls The five polymorphisms: rs1800497[Taq1A], rs1799732 [− 141C ins/del], rs6277 [C957T], rs2283265, and rs12364283 | 79 BED obese adults (67 female; 12 male; age: 34.8 ± 6.5; BMI: 38.6 ± 7.2) 151 obese adults (104 female; 47 male; age: 35.6 ± 7.2; BMI: 38.7 ± 7.1) Exclusion: a current diagnosis of any psychotic disorder, substance abuse, alcoholism, or a serious medical/physical illness such as cancer | Non-enzymatic, high salt procedure was used to extract DNA from the whole blood | Compared to weight-matched controls, BED was significantly related to the rs1800497 and rs6277 genotypes that reflect enhanced striatal dopamine neurotransmission BED is distinguished by a greater density of D2 receptors and higher D2 binding potential compared to the obese controls The multi-locus D2 genetic profile observed in BED participants suggests enhanced dopamine signaling, and thereby increased striatal reactivity, compared to obese adults without binge eating |
Davis et al. 59 Cross-sectional | Examine the associations between a multilocus genetic profile score and binge eating Multilocus genetic profile: Taq1A C/T, C957T, − 141 Ins/Del, DAT1, Val158Met | 120 adults (82 female, 38 male), 24% of participants met the diagnostic criteria for BED Exclusion: a current diagnosis of any psychotic disorder, substance abuse, or a serious medical/physical illness such as cancer or heart disease | Non-enzymatic, high salt procedure was used to extract DNA from the whole blood Binge eating questionnaire | Higher multilocus genetic profile score (enhanced ventral striatum striatal dopamine-signaling) was associated with more bingeing |
Donofry et al. 65 Cross-sectional | Test whether the COMT met allele increased risk for, and severity of, eating disorder symptomatology in community volunteers | 1003 community-based Caucasian adults (female: 51.2%; age: 44.6 ± 6.8; BMI: 27.0 ± 5.4) Exclusion: a clinical history of neurologic illness, cardiovascular disease, cancer treatment within the previous year, schizophrenia, or other psychoses | DNA was isolated from white blood cells using the PureGene kit COMT val/met SNP was genotyped using florescence polarization Eating disorders inventory | Individuals carrying the met allele of the COMT val158met were 87% more likely than individuals with the val/val genotype to report symptoms on the Bulimia subscale It is possible that met allele carriers have greater difficulty exerting top-down control of behavior driven by midbrain dopamine activation |
Gervasini et al. 62 Case–control | Determine dopamine Receptor D4 gene on general psychopathological symptoms in eating disorder patients | 74 female with BN (age: 20.9 ± 8.1; BMI: 24.6 ± 6.9) 199 female with AN Exclusion: dementia, mental retardation, schizophrenia, Turner's syndrome, other neurological disorders and underlying endocrine pathologies | Genomic DNA purification was performed with a Qiagen blood midi kit Symptom Checklist 90 Revised | General psychopathological features such as somatization, obsessive–compulsive, anxiety, phobic anxiety, and paranoid ideation were significantly higher in BN women who carried haplotype DRD4*2 (non7R-L-C–C) DRD4 haplotypes may contribute to individual variance in personality features that predispose to disordered eating |
Gonzalez et al. 60 Cross-sectional | Analyze the association between three common polymorphisms in the dopaminergic pathways with eating disorder symptoms in patients with BN or BED Three polymorphisms: DAT1 VNTR 10R/9R, DRD2 A2/A1 and DRD3 Ser9Gly | 80 female with BN (BMI: 25.6 ± 8.9) 34 female with BED (BMI: 35.4 ± 11.5) Exclusion: neurological disorders (such as mental retardation, dementia or Turner syndrome) and underlying endocrine pathologies | Genomic DNA was isolated from whole blood samples using a standard phenol–chloroform extraction method Eating Disorders Inventory Test-2 (EDI-2) Revised Symptom Checklist 90 questionnaire | BED patients with the Ser9Gly variant showed higher EDI-2 scores than Ser9Ser carriers No associations were found for the BN group |
Suarez-Ortiz et al. 83 Animal study | Determine the effect of D2 receptor antagonist on binge eating | Female Sprague Dawley rats Binge eating rats were induced by intermittent access to a sucrose solution Rats were divided into three groups: no access (control, n = 14), 2-h daily access (intermittent, n = 16), and 24-h daily access (ad libitum, n = 13) during 28 days Rats in the intermittent access group were randomly assigned to receive injections of vehicle or raclopride (n = 8) | Raclopride tartrate salt (Sigma Chemical Co., Toluca, Mexico) was dissolved in 0.9% saline solution, and was injected into nucleus accumbens | Blockade of dopamine D2 receptors in the nucleus accumbens prevented the effects of the intermittent access to the sucrose solution on meal frequency and duration Blockade of dopamine D2 receptors specifically decreased the sucrose solution intake |
Mineo et al. 75 Animal study | Test whether dopamine manipulation using 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) and L-dopa will influence binge-like eating behavior | Male Wistar rats (n = 45) Sham-operated + saline (Sham; n = 15), parkinsonian 6-OHDA + saline (6-OHDA; n = 15), and 6-OHDA + L-dopa (L-dopa; n = 15) rats were randomly allotted into three groups: control group (standard chow), low restriction group, and high restriction group | L-dopa, 6–12 mg/kg plus 12 mg/kg of benserazide intraperitoneally once a day for 7 weeks | Sham-operated animals with intact nucleus accumbens core plasticity reliably developed food-addiction–like behavior when exposed to intermittent access to a highly palatable food 6-OHDA–lesioned animals displayed no increasing interest about the chocolate, but the unresponsiveness was rescued by L-dopa Food-addiction–like behavior relies on an intact ventral striatum core |