Skip to main content

Table 3 ProYouth OZ Usage (i.e., logins, page hits, monitoring assessments)

From: Recruitment, adherence and attrition challenges in internet-based indicated prevention programs for eating disorders: lessons learned from a randomised controlled trial of ProYouth OZ

 

Total (n = 23)

ProYouth OZ Peers (n = 11)

ProYouth OZ (n = 10)

Control group# (n = 2)

Logins

    

 N (%)

97

61 (62.9%)

32 (33.0%)

4 (4.1%)

 M (SD)

4.22 (4.13)

5.55 (4.61)

3.20 (3.68)

2.00 (1.41)

 Md (IQR)

3 (5)

5 (5)

2 (3)

2

Page hits

    

 N (%)

403

208 (51.6%)

176 (43.7%)

19 (4.7%)

 M (SD)

17.52 (18.57)

18.91 (15.35)

17.60 (23.71)

9.5 (4.95)

 Md (IQR)

13 (11)

18 (18)

11.5 (15)

9.5

 

Total

ProYouth OZ Peers

ProYouth OZ

Control group

 

(n = 29)

(n = 11)

(n = 14)

(n = 4)

Monitoring

    

 M, SD

2.55 (1.88)

1.82 (1.54)

3.07 (1.77)

2.75 (2.87)

 Md, IQR

2 (3)

1 (1)

3 (4)

1.5 (5)

  1. Logins = number of logins to ProYouth OZ, Page hits = number of pages accessed in the participation area (i.e., after login), Monitoring = number of completed monitoring assessments, IQR = inter quartile range
  2. #Control group participants were waitlisted to receive the intervention after the pre, post, and 3-month follow-up assessments
Back to article page

Journal of Eating Disorders

ISSN: 2050-2974