Skip to main content

Table 3 Principal component analysis and construct validation of the FABIANA-checklist (18 items)

From: The development and psychometric evaluation of FABIANA-checklist: a scale to assess factors influencing treatment initiation in anorexia nervosa

Components (Eigenvalue)

Items (Nr.)

Principal Components Analysis

Construct validity

1

2

3

4

5

6

rit

α

Assumptions

r, p

1 Primary care perceived as supportive and competent (4.20)

I had a doctor2 I trusted. (13)

.84

     

.61

.75

PACIC-5A

.59***

I had a doctor2 with a great competence in the field of eating disorders. (14)

.78

     

.59

.75

PACIC-5A

.42***

I had a doctor2 who cooperated well with my other practitioners. (15)

.61

   

.31

 

.50

.77

PACIC-5A

.29*

After my anorexia was diagnosed, I had regular appointments with a doctor2. (12)

.51

   

.38

 

.41

.78

PACIC-5A

.42***

I had a doctor2 who arranged that I received appropriate treatment. (8)

.49

.35

  

.26

 

.51

.76

PACIC-5A

.24*

I had a doctor2 who recognized my anorexia at an early stage of the illness. (9)

.46

.27

.58

   

.54

.76

PACIC-5A

.32**

I had a doctor2 who dealt badly with my difficulties concerning food, body-shape or weight (e.g. did not take my complaints seriously or trivialized them).1 (11)

.45

  

 − .47

  

.35

.79

PACIC-5A

.35**

I had a doctor2 who told me unambiguously that I had anorexia. (10)

.43

 

.35

  

.33

.48

.77

PACIC-5A

.34**

2 Emotional and practical support from the social environment/ relatives (1.80)

My social environment encouraged me to take up treatment. (6)

 

.82

    

.60

.45

F-SozU

.21*

My social environment often expressed concern about my anorexia. (4)

.25

.72

    

.43

.64

F-SozU

.43***

At least one person from my social environment supported me practically in treatment initiation (e.g. arranged or accompanied me to medical appointments). (5)

 

.71

    

.46

.64

F-SozU

.14

3 Need and Searching for Orientation and Help (1.60)

It was difficult for me and/ or my relatives or persons I relate to closely to find out whom I could consult best to get help.1 (16)

  

.75

.24

  

 − .16

 

PACIC-5A

.14

It helped me to look at or read articles regarding the successful treatment of anorexia or the recovery of other people with anorexia (e.g. in books, reports, social media). (3)

.36

 

− .57

   

 − .16

 

BIPQ: Personal control3

 − .26*

BIPQ: Treatment control4

.23*

BIPQ: Comprehensibility5

.09

4 Social environment recognizing AN and need for help (1.39)

People from my social environment have never addressed my anorexia, or have done so too late.1 (1)

   

.76

  

.34

.20

F-SozU

.15

There was at least one person in my social environment who understood at an early stage of the illness that I needed professional help. (2)

   

.43

.40

.32

.22

.40

F-SozU

.22*

I believed that undergoing psychotherapy was a sign of weakness.1 (17)

.36

  

.61

.28

.29

.22

.38

BIPQ: Personal control3

.14

BIPQ: Treatment control4

.16

BIPQ: Comprehensibility5

.20*

5 Informed relatives (1.22)

My relatives or persons I relate to closely informed themselves on the subject of anorexia (e.g. read books, researched on the internet, visited a counselling center or a doctor2). (7)

    

.82

   

F-SozU

.05

6 Absence of negative media influence (1.05)

By comparing with girls or women in the media (e.g. television, internet, social media) I considered a certain diet (e.g. a very restricted diet), a very slim figure or a very low weight to be normal so that I didn’t feel the need for treatment.1 (18)

     

.85

  

BIPQ: Comprehensibility5

.20*

BIPQ: Causal representation “Media” 6 ( −)

 − .31**

Variance explained (%)

 

23.33

9.98

8.86

7.71

6.76

5.82

    

Cronbach’s alpha

 

.79

.67

 − .38

.42

      
  1. 1The polarity of item 1, 11, 16, 17 and 18 was inverted
  2. 2Patients are asked in the introduction of the questionnaire, to refer to the physicians they consulted before being referred to specialized care
  3. 3BIPQ item 3 with 0 = absolutely no personal control and 10 = extreme personal control
  4. 4BIPQ item 4 with 0 = perception that treatment is not helpful at all and 10 = perception of treatment as extremely helpful
  5. 5BIPQ item 7 with 0 = no illness perception and 10 = very clear illness perception
  6. 6BIPQ Item 9, open item asking for the tree major subjective causes for the illness
  7. All illness causes related to influences of media were considered. rif = item-factor correlation, α = Cronbach’s alpha of the component if the item is deleted, (−) negative correlation expected, *p < .05, **p < .01; ***p < .001 (one-sided)