Skip to main content

Table 3 Outcome characteristics of each latent class

From: Early weight gain trajectories in first episode anorexia: predictors of outcome for emerging adults in outpatient treatment

Variable

Class1, n = 12

(high, stable)

Class2, n = 41

(high, moderate)

Class3, n = 20

(low, rapid)

Class4, n = 34

(medium, stable)

Group comparison

Follow-Up BMI

17.56 (1.69) 1

19.32 (1.73) 2

18.03 (2.95)

18.17 (1.49)

F(3,87) = 3.44, p = 0.02 a

Follow-Up BMI > 18.5

4 /11 (36.4%)

20/32 (62.3%)

7/16 (43.8%)

15/32 (46.9%)

X2 (3) = 3.18, p = 0.39

BMI change

0.38 (1.68) 1

1.57 (1.80) 1

3.40 (2.95) 2

1.95 (1.55)

F(3,87) = 5.66, p < 0.001

Follow-Up EDE-Q

2.50 (1.48)

2.64 (1.88)

2.28 (1.80)

1.91 (1.41)

F(3,77) = 0.96, p = 0.42

Follow-Up EDE-Q < 2.8

6/10 (60.0%)

19/29 (65.5%)

9/14 (64.3%)

23/29 (79.3%)

X2 (3) = 2.14, p = 0.59

EDE-Q change

−1.75 (1.31)

−1.51 (1.67)

− 1.30 (1.75)

−1.44 (1.24)

F(3,69) = 0.19, p = 0.90

Completed treatment

11/12 (91.7%)

28/41 (68.3%)

13/20 (65.0%)

29/34 (85.3%)

Fisher’s Exact = 5.61, p = 0.14

Intensive treatment b

–

2/41 (4.9%)

4/20 (20.0%)

3/34 (8.8%)

Fisher’s Exact = 0.18, p = 0.15

Remission at Follow-up

1/10 (10.0%)

13/30 (43.3%)

5/16 (31.3%)

10/30 (33.3%)

Fisher’s Exact = 3.84, p = 0.28

  1. BMI Body mass index, in kg/m2, EDE-Q Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire
  2. 1,2,3Different superscripts indicate significant differences between the classes. For example, Class 1 and Class 2 have significantly different follow-up BMI
  3. aNon-significant with Bonferroni correction; b Intensive treatment refers to stepped up care into day or inpatient during the 12-month follow-up period