Skip to main content

Table 4 Cross-sectional correlations of CBIQA domains with key body image constructs (N = 380)

From: Psychometric properties of the contextual body image questionnaire for athletes: a replication and extension study in female collegiate athletes

 

Daily Life

Sport

Appearance

Muscularity

Thin-fat self

Thin-fat other

Appearance

Muscularity

Thin-fat self

Thin-fat other

EDEQ Res

−.232**

.023

.443**

.226**

−.246**

.027

.391**

.276**

EDEQ EC

−.260**

.059

.401**

.280**

−.294**

.015

.369**

.339**

EDEQ WC

−.375**

.016

.620**

.387**

−.383**

.014

.568**

.428**

EDEQ SC

−.391**

−.021

.594**

.385**

−.407**

−.029

.559**

.422**

EDEQ Global

−.354**

.017

.581**

.358**

−.371**

.006

.533**

.408**

IBSSR

.059

−.082

.053

−.086

−.023

−.143**

.048

−.044

PANAS

−.224**

−.125

.222**

.130

−.250**

−.188**

.226**

.163**

  1. Note: ** = p < .01; CBIQA Contextual Body Image Questionnaire for Athletes; EDE-Q Eating Disorders Examination – Questionnaire; EDE-Q Res Restraint subscale; EDE-Q EC Eating concerns subscale; EDE-Q WC Weight concerns subscale; EDE-Q SC Shape concerns subscale; EDE-Q Global EDE-Q global score; IBSS-R Ideal Body Stereotype Scale – Revised; PANAS Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, negative affect subscale
  2. Note: appearance lower scores = “too ugly;” muscularity lower scores = “too unmuscular;” thin/fat both dimensions higher = “too fat”