Diet and behavioral habits related to oral health in eating disorder patients: a matched case-control study

Table 7 Conditional logistic regression. Final model, stepwise forward entry method

	P	OR	95% CI for OR
Model A: ED relatively good vs. controls (ref category: ED-good)
Regular soft drinks	0.03	0.57	0.35–0.94
Caffeine-containing drinks	0.005	1.34	1.10–1.64
Model B: ED-bad disease state vs. controls (ref category: ED-bad)
Lunch	0.01	0.59	0.39–0.88
Sweet biscuits	0.001	0.15	0.05–0.48
Model C: ED-good vs. bad (ref category: ED-good)
Lunch	0.03	1.73	1.05–2.89

Included independent variables:
Model A: relatively good disease state vs. controls. Included independent variables – Consumption of Cola light, Cola regular, total carbonated regular soft drinks, total caffeine-containing drinks (L/week), apples (no/week), sweet biscuits (never/seldom or > one intake per month)
Model B: bad disease state vs. controls. Included independent variables – Cola regular, total carbonated regular soft drinks, milk (L/week), lunch (no/week), sweet biscuits, hard cheese (never/seldom or > one intake per month)
Model C: relatively good vs. bad disease state. Included independent variables – Nutrition drinks (L/week), breakfast, lunch, dinner, in-between meals (no/week), sweet biscuits (never/seldom or > one intake per month)
Model A: Nagelkerke R² = 0.42. Model B: Nagelkerke R² = 0.65. Model C: Nagelkerke R² = 0.45

ISSN: 2050-2974