Skip to main content

Table 2 Parent focused FBT compared to standard FBT for children and adolescents with anorexia nervosa

From: Canadian practice guidelines for the treatment of children and adolescents with eating disorders

Certainty assessment

Impact

Certainty

Importance

№ of studies

Study design

Risk of bias

Inconsistency

Indirectness

Imprecision

Other considerations

Remission (assessed with: Weight greater than 95% and EDE score within 1 SD), Weight (kg), Psychological symptoms (EDI score)

 3

Randomized Trials

not serious

not serious

not serious

not serious

none

one RCT (n = 107) adolescents aged 12–18. Remission higher in Separated FBT (43% vs. 22%) compared to Standard FBT at end of treatment.

HIGH

CRITICAL

not serious

not serious

not serious

not serious

none

one RCT (n = 40), found no differences in weight outcome at end of treatment, except when subgroups analyzed. Those with high expressed emotion did better in separated family therapy in terms of weight gain.

One pilot RCT (n = 18) found no differences in weight outcome at the end of treatment; both groups improved.

HIGH

CRITICAL

not serious

not serious

not serious

not serious

none

Improvement in EDI score was greater in the standard FBT group compared to the separated group.

One pilot RCT (n = 18) found both groups improved in EAT scores with no difference between groups.

HIGH

CRITICAL

  1. Bibliography:
  2. RCTs - Eisler 2000 [45], Le Grange 1992 [47], Le Grange 2016 [46]