Skip to main content

Table 5 All predictors of remission at follow-up in the whole sample and significant values

From: The outcome at follow-up after inpatient eating disorder treatment: a naturalistic study

Covariates

Logistic regression multivariate model

OR

95% CI

z-value

p-value

Age (years) at admission

0.92

0.76; 1.11

−0.92

0.36

Duration of illness (years)

1.04

0.85; 1.29

0.38

0.70

Follow-up period (months)

1.02

0.99; 1.04

1.20

0.23

Inpatient stay (days)

NAª

BMI (A)

1.16

0.99; 1.35

1.85

0.07

Diff BMI (A–D)

1.40

1.03; 1.89

2.31

< 0.05

EDI-2 symptom scale (A)

0.94

0.89; 0.99

−2.26

< 0.05

Diff EDI-2-symptom scale (A–D)

0.93

0.89; 0.99

−2.61

< 0.01

EDI-2 psychological scale (A)

NAª

Diff EDI-2 psychological scale (A–D)

1.01

0.99; 1.04

0.96

0.38

BDI-II sum score (A)

1.02

0.92; 1.12

0.32

0.75

Diff BDI-II (A–D)

1.04

0.96; 1.12

0.90

0.37

SCL-90-R mean score (A)

0.63

0.11; 3.63

−0.52

0.60

Diff SCL-90-R (A–D)

0.24

0.05; 1.24

−1.70

0.09

CIP mean score (A)

0.84

0.23; 3.03

−0.27

0.79

Diff CIP (A–D)

NAb

  1. Note: Duration of illness was self-reported
  2. Abbreviations: OR odds ratio, AN anorexia nervosa, Diff difference, BMI body mass index, EDE-Q Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire, EDI Eating Disorder Inventory, BDI Beck Depression Inventory, SCL Symptom Checklist, CIP Circumplex Interpersonal Problems, CI confidence interval, NA not available, A admission, D discharge
  3. ªThe odds ratio = 1 in the initial multivariate model; removed from the final model
  4. bRemoved from the final multivariate model due to strong correlation with CIP scores at admission that created issues of collinearity in the multivariate model