Skip to main content

Table 4 Self-report questionnaire scores and BMI in complete cases from admission to follow-up

From: The outcome at follow-up after inpatient eating disorder treatment: a naturalistic study

Values

Admission

Discharge

Follow-up

Differences A–F

Effect size A–F

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

t-valuea; p-valueb

Cohen’s d

EDI-2 symptom scale

A–F (n = 133)

39.7 (13.4)

30.9 (14.8)

28.5 (17.3)

7.06***

0.67

EDI-2 psychological scale

A–F (n = 133)

72.5 (31.5)

52.0 (32.1)

50.3 (32.5)

7.13***

0.65

BDI II sum score

A–F (n = 133)

31.6 (11.1)

19.6 (12.9)

19.7 (14.2)

9.89***

0.92

SCL-90-R mean score

A–F (n = 142)

1.7 (0.7)

1.1 (0.7)

1.1 (0.8)

8.46***

0.75

CIP mean score

A–F (n = 141)

1.6 (0.6)

1.3 (0.6)

1.3 (0.7)

5.64***

0.46

BMIͨͨ AN patientsc

A–F (n = 96)

15.7 (1.6)

19.6 (1.9)

19.6 (2.8)

13.62***

1.76

  1. Notes:
  2. Abbreviations: EDE-Q Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire, EDI Eating Disorder Inventory, BDI Beck Depression Inventory, SCL Symptom Checklist, CIP Circumplex Interpersonal Problems
  3. aPaired sample t-test from admission to follow-up; A – admission; F – follow-up
  4. bOnly significant p-values are reported, and p-value *** = p < .001; Cohen’s d: small effect size = 0.2, medium = 0.5, large = 0.8
  5. n = Number of participants included in analyses
  6. cChanges in body mass index (BMI) are only reported for AN patients
Back to article page

Journal of Eating Disorders

ISSN: 2050-2974