Skip to main content

Table 3 Instrumental responding and ratings adjusted for covariates

From: Relating goal-directed behaviour to grazing in persons with obesity with and without eating disorder features

 

HC

OB

OBED

Wald χ2(2)

p

Pairwise comparisons

EMM (SE)

EMM (SE)

EMM (SE)

 

n = 43

n = 25

n = 19

   

High contingency presses

155.42 (7.91)

146.88 (11.02)

105.54 (12.82)

8.21

.016

HC/OB > OBED

Low contingency presses

82.11 (5.17)

69.39 (7.12)

70.27 (6.19)

3.18

.204

–

CSI

0.65 (0.02)

0.68 (0.02)

0.57 (0.03)

9.32

.009

HC/OB > OBED

High contingency rating

5.32 (0.14)

5.43 (0.15)

5.63 (0.20)

1.50

.471

–

Low contingency rating

2.98 (0.13)

2.79 (0.18)

2.92 (0.15)

0.70

.705

–

 

n = 43

n = 24

n = 19

   

Nondevalued presses (training)

111.86 (17.80)

102.13 (21.30)

92.62 (23.88)

0.38

.827

–

Devalued presses (training)

98.47 (16.12

99.46 (21.48)

103.39 (29.85)

0.02

.991

–

Nondevalued presses (extinction)

201.45 (31.47)

178.93 (37.48)

154.20 (39.82)

0.78

.676

–

Devalued presses (extinction)

82.66 (14.10)

92.73 (20.03)

61.63 (17.65)

1.24

.537

–

Nondevalued presses (reacquisition)

205.84 (32.21)

185.13 (39.15)

146.71 (37.58)

1.20

.548

–

Devalued presses (reacquisition)

79.57 (13.79)

64.89 (13.70)

53.44 (16.58)

1.18

.556

–

DSI (training)

0.51 (0.04)

0.50 (0.05)

0.50 (0.06)

0.07

.967

–

DSI (extinction)

0.70 (0.06)

0.66 (0.08)

0.74 (0.11)

0.29

.864

–

DSI (reacquisition)

0.73 (0.06)

0.74 (0.08)

0.74 (0.10)

0.02

.991

–

T2-T1 Devalued outcome pleasantness rating

0.16 (0.15)

0.00 (0.21)

0.27 (0.26)

0.71

.700

–

T2-T1 Non-devalued outcome pleasantness rating

−1.00 (0.28)

−1.22 (0.37)

−1.67 (0.47)

1.42

.493

–