| HC | OB | OBED | Wald χ2(2) | p | Pairwise comparisons |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMM (SE) | EMM (SE) | EMM (SE) | ||||
 | n = 43 | n = 25 | n = 19 |  |  |  |
High contingency presses | 155.42 (7.91) | 146.88 (11.02) | 105.54 (12.82) | 8.21 | .016 | HC/OB > OBED |
Low contingency presses | 82.11 (5.17) | 69.39 (7.12) | 70.27 (6.19) | 3.18 | .204 | – |
CSI | 0.65 (0.02) | 0.68 (0.02) | 0.57 (0.03) | 9.32 | .009 | HC/OB > OBED |
High contingency rating | 5.32 (0.14) | 5.43 (0.15) | 5.63 (0.20) | 1.50 | .471 | – |
Low contingency rating | 2.98 (0.13) | 2.79 (0.18) | 2.92 (0.15) | 0.70 | .705 | – |
 | n = 43 | n = 24 | n = 19 |  |  |  |
Nondevalued presses (training) | 111.86 (17.80) | 102.13 (21.30) | 92.62 (23.88) | 0.38 | .827 | – |
Devalued presses (training) | 98.47 (16.12 | 99.46 (21.48) | 103.39 (29.85) | 0.02 | .991 | – |
Nondevalued presses (extinction) | 201.45 (31.47) | 178.93 (37.48) | 154.20 (39.82) | 0.78 | .676 | – |
Devalued presses (extinction) | 82.66 (14.10) | 92.73 (20.03) | 61.63 (17.65) | 1.24 | .537 | – |
Nondevalued presses (reacquisition) | 205.84 (32.21) | 185.13 (39.15) | 146.71 (37.58) | 1.20 | .548 | – |
Devalued presses (reacquisition) | 79.57 (13.79) | 64.89 (13.70) | 53.44 (16.58) | 1.18 | .556 | – |
DSI (training) | 0.51 (0.04) | 0.50 (0.05) | 0.50 (0.06) | 0.07 | .967 | – |
DSI (extinction) | 0.70 (0.06) | 0.66 (0.08) | 0.74 (0.11) | 0.29 | .864 | – |
DSI (reacquisition) | 0.73 (0.06) | 0.74 (0.08) | 0.74 (0.10) | 0.02 | .991 | – |
T2-T1 Devalued outcome pleasantness rating | 0.16 (0.15) | 0.00 (0.21) | 0.27 (0.26) | 0.71 | .700 | – |
T2-T1 Non-devalued outcome pleasantness rating | −1.00 (0.28) | −1.22 (0.37) | −1.67 (0.47) | 1.42 | .493 | – |