Skip to main content

Table 3 Instrumental responding and ratings adjusted for covariates

From: Relating goal-directed behaviour to grazing in persons with obesity with and without eating disorder features

  HC OB OBED Wald χ2(2) p Pairwise comparisons
EMM (SE) EMM (SE) EMM (SE)
  n = 43 n = 25 n = 19    
High contingency presses 155.42 (7.91) 146.88 (11.02) 105.54 (12.82) 8.21 .016 HC/OB > OBED
Low contingency presses 82.11 (5.17) 69.39 (7.12) 70.27 (6.19) 3.18 .204
CSI 0.65 (0.02) 0.68 (0.02) 0.57 (0.03) 9.32 .009 HC/OB > OBED
High contingency rating 5.32 (0.14) 5.43 (0.15) 5.63 (0.20) 1.50 .471
Low contingency rating 2.98 (0.13) 2.79 (0.18) 2.92 (0.15) 0.70 .705
  n = 43 n = 24 n = 19    
Nondevalued presses (training) 111.86 (17.80) 102.13 (21.30) 92.62 (23.88) 0.38 .827
Devalued presses (training) 98.47 (16.12 99.46 (21.48) 103.39 (29.85) 0.02 .991
Nondevalued presses (extinction) 201.45 (31.47) 178.93 (37.48) 154.20 (39.82) 0.78 .676
Devalued presses (extinction) 82.66 (14.10) 92.73 (20.03) 61.63 (17.65) 1.24 .537
Nondevalued presses (reacquisition) 205.84 (32.21) 185.13 (39.15) 146.71 (37.58) 1.20 .548
Devalued presses (reacquisition) 79.57 (13.79) 64.89 (13.70) 53.44 (16.58) 1.18 .556
DSI (training) 0.51 (0.04) 0.50 (0.05) 0.50 (0.06) 0.07 .967
DSI (extinction) 0.70 (0.06) 0.66 (0.08) 0.74 (0.11) 0.29 .864
DSI (reacquisition) 0.73 (0.06) 0.74 (0.08) 0.74 (0.10) 0.02 .991
T2-T1 Devalued outcome pleasantness rating 0.16 (0.15) 0.00 (0.21) 0.27 (0.26) 0.71 .700
T2-T1 Non-devalued outcome pleasantness rating −1.00 (0.28) −1.22 (0.37) −1.67 (0.47) 1.42 .493