Skip to main content

Table 2 Participants’ current and ideal muscle mass with prevalence of disordered eating attitudes and body mass index for each category

From: Disordered eating attitudes correlate with body dissatisfaction among Kuwaiti male college students

Muscle mass (FFMI)

Total selections

n (%)

BMI

M (SD)

EAT-26 categories

At risk of disordered eating attitudes

n (%)

Not at risk of disordered eating attitudes n (%)

χ2(d.f.), p

Current

 15.5

99 (24.8%)

25 (5.77)

38 (38.4%)

61 (61.6%)

χ2(4) = 12.42, p < .014

 18.9

128 (32.1%)

25.53 (4.7)

53 (41.4%)

75 (58.6%)

 22

123 (30.8%)

25.97 (4.54)

62 (50%)

62 (50%)

 25.6

33 (8.3%)

26.93 (6.17)

20 (60.6%)

13 (39.4%)

 29

16 (4%)

29.56 (8.67)

12 (75%)

4 (25%)

Ideal

 15.5

27 (6.8%)

25.14 (5.85)

12 (44.4%)

15 (55.6%)

χ2(4) = 7.24, p < .124

 18.9

43 (10.8%)

24.01 (5.55)

19 (44.2%)

24 (55.8%)

 22

210 (52.6%)

26.11 (5.27)

88 (41.7%)

123 (58.3%)

 25.6

93 (23.3%)

26.11 (5.36)

49 (52.7%)

44 (47.3%)

 29

26 (6.5%)

26.24 (4.09)

17 (65.4%)

9 (34.6%)

  1. BMI body mass index, EAT-26 eating attitudes test, FFMI fat free mass index. Pearson’s chi-squared tests were used to compare the prevalence of the risk of disordered eating between groups in relation to current and ideal levels of muscle mass