Skip to main content

Table 3 Bivariate analysis of the factors associated with the Dutch restrained eating scale

From: Factors associated with restrained eating and validation of the Arabic version of the restrained eating scale among an adult representative sample of the Lebanese population: a cross-sectional study

 

Dutch restrained eating scale

p-value

Mean ± SD

Gender

Male

2.35 ± 0.92

< 0.001

Female

2.65 ± 0.97

Marital status

Single

2.49 ± 0.98

0.004

Married

2.71 ± 0.91

Monthly income

No income

2.49 ± 0.98

0.021

<  1000$

2.50 ± 0.97

1000–2000 $

2.74 ± 0.91

>  2000 $

2.80 ± 0.83

Education level

Primary

2.67 ± 1.02

0.926

Complementary

2.51 ± 0.85

Secondary

2.56 ± 0.97

University

2.55 ± 0.97

Alcohol use

Yes

2.55 ± 1.17

0.984

No

2.54 ± 0.95

Tobacco use

Yes

2.48 ± 0.99

0.173

No

2.59 ± 0.95

Caffeine

Yes

2.57 ± 0.97

0.053

No

2.35 ± 0.90

Family history of eating disorders

Yes

2.85 ± 0.90

< 0.001

No

2.47 ± 0.97

Pressure from TV, magazine to lose weight

Yes

3.09 ± 0.90

< 0.001

No

2.43 ± 0.94

Practicing sport activities

Yes

2.68 ± 0.95

< 0.001

No

2.36 ± 0.96

Receiving comments from the family concerning losing weight

Yes

2.64 ± 0.97

0.113

No

2.52 ± 0.96

Being insulted

Yes

2.65 ± 0.97

0.354

No

2.54 ± 0.96

Being physically abused

Yes

2.65 ± 0.91

0.405

No

2.54 ± 0.97

Being sexually abused

Yes

2.61 ± 0.84

0.741

No

2.55 ± 0.97

  1. SD Standard deviation