Skip to main content

Table 5 Correlations for sources of knowledge translation strategies (n = 100)

From: Cognitive behavioural therapy for eating disorders: how do clinician characteristics impact on treatment fidelity?

 

Final sample

n (%)

Mean knowledge score

Knowledge correlation

Mean treatment fidelity score

Treatment fidelity correlation

Use of training manuala

  

.303**

 

.385**

 Yes

51 (51)

84.64

 

76.04

 

 No

49 (49)

70.07

 

55.62

 

Eating disorder traininga

  

. 395**

 

.436**

 Yes

64 (64)

84.63

 

74.69

 

 No

36 (36)

64.81

 

50.64

 

Eating disorder supervisiona

  

.419**

 

.396**

 Yes

57 (57)

86.26

 

75.15

 

 No

43 (43)

65.89

 

53.95

 

Number of strategies used

  

.548**

 

.597**

 0

13 (13)

  

37.26

 

 1

29 (29)

  

55.87

 

 2

31 (31)

  

70.14

 

 3

27 (27)

  

86.08

 
  1. **Correlation is significant at the .01 level (two-tailed)
  2. aPoint-biserial correlation between dichotomous and interval scales. Dichotomous variable coding: Use of training manual (No = 0, Yes = 1); attended eating disorder training (No = 0, Yes = 1); attended eating disorder supervision (No = 0, Yes = 1)